journal article·2025-05-09Open access

When the Triplet State Doesn’t Matter: Insights into Its Impact on VOC

Mohammad Saeed Shadabroo, Nurlan Tokmoldin, Atul Shukla, Acacia Patterson, Tanner M. Melody, Obaid Alqahtani, Brian A. Collins, Dieter Neher, Safa Shoaee

ACS Energy Letters· Volume 10· Issue 5

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Organic solar cell efficiency, exceeding 20%, is limited by recombination losses from singlet and triplet charge-transfer (CT) states and local triplet excitons, impacting open-circuit voltage ( V OC ). Using PM6:o-IDTBR, a very low nonradiative voltage loss, Δ V nr = 160 mV, is achieved, despite the presence of triplet excitons (.6 × 10 15 cm –3 ). In employing the present system as a model exemplar, we elucidate the circumstance wherein, if the triplet lifetime surpasses the lifetime of the CT decay, the dissociation of triplet excitons to the CT state emerges as a feasible process. This, in turn, serves to reduce the manifestation of an additional loss channel from the T1 state and minimizes losses from T1. In PM6:o-IDTBR, the long triplet lifetime (10 μs) enables dissociation of the triplet state and limits the triplet-mediated recombination to ∼10%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany

Heterostructure semiconductor physics, Paul Drude Institute for Solid State Electronics, Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, Germany

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Washington State University, 100 Dairy Road, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States

Department of Physics

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University

Funding

Leibniz-Gemeinschaft · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20220208910.1002/adma.202202089 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20220471810.1002/adma.202204718 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y ↗
4. 10.1038/s41563-019-0324-510.1038/s41563-019-0324-5 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41563-018-0128-z10.1038/s41563-018-0128-z ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20230135710.1002/aenm.202301357 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20090009010.1002/adfm.200900090 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.04.00210.1016/j.joule.2021.04.002 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature1233910.1038/nature12339 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-021-03840-510.1038/s41586-021-03840-5 ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms750110.1038/ncomms7501 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0MH00286K10.1039/D0MH00286K ↗
13. 10.1038/srep2915810.1038/srep29158 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.04.02610.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.04.026 ↗
15. 10.1039/C4EE03630A10.1039/C4EE03630A ↗
16. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.19210.1038/nphoton.2009.192 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja105260d10.1021/ja105260d ↗
18. 10.1021/ja303154g10.1021/ja303154g ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.9b1252610.1021/jacs.9b12526 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20160096110.1002/aenm.201600961 ↗
21. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.5310.1038/nenergy.2017.53 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20180045110.1002/aenm.201800451 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20220571110.1002/adfm.202205711 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0057210.1021/acsenergylett.3c00572 ↗
25. 10.1002/solr.20200064910.1002/solr.202000649 ↗
26. 10.1038/3509053910.1038/35090539 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41560-021-00843-410.1038/s41560-021-00843-4 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20170450710.1002/adfm.201704507 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41566-019-0573-510.1038/s41566-019-0573-5 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-019-08386-910.1038/s41467-019-08386-9 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20160271310.1002/aenm.201602713 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20210874910.1002/adma.202108749 ↗
33. 10.1039/D2TA05172A10.1039/D2TA05172A ↗