Discussion of the Definition for Acoustic Emission Event in the Time Series of Concrete Damage Process
Source abstract
Abstract
Acoustic emission signals from concrete compression damage process are non-stationary and their arrival time is unknown. Therefore, the definition on the acoustic emission event in the time series is not clear. In this paper, the acoustic emission signals associated with concrete specimen under uniaxial compression are acquired by full-digital acoustic emission system. The overlapping phenomenon of acoustic emission signal is presented and discussed by the analysis of time interval between adjacent hits. Acoustic emission signals are classified into three categories according to their waveform characteristics. And the result shows that as the loading process continues, more and more amount of continuous type of acoustic emission signals appeared, indicating the acoustic emission signal does not carry the features of burst type, which will introduce obvious errors in the calculation of acoustic emission event. In contrast, the average signal level used in the analysis of continuous type of acoustic emission signal shows a good regularity with the damage process of concrete.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geoscience and Mining Technology · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim, J.S., Lee, K.S., Cho, W.J., et al., A comparative evaluation of stress-strain and acoustic emission methods for quantitative damage assessments of brittle rock, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2015, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 495–508.10.1007/s00603-014-0590-0 ↗
2. Grégoire, D., Verdon, L., Lefort, V., et al., Mesoscale analysis of failure in quasi-brittle materials: comparison between lattice model and acoustic emission data, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech, 2015, vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 1639–1664.10.1002/nag.2363 ↗
3. Wang, Y., Chen, S.J., Zhao, H.T., et al., Acoustic emission characteristics of interface between aggregate and mortar under shear loading, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 497–508.10.1134/S1061830915080094 ↗
4. Moradian, Z., Einstein, H.H., and Ballivy, G., Detection of cracking levels in brittle rocks by parametric analysis of the acoustic emission signals, Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2016, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 785–800.10.1007/s00603-015-0775-1 ↗
5. Grosse, C.U., Glaser, S.D., and Kruger, M., Initial development of wireless acoustic emission sensor Motes for civil infrastructure state monitoring, Smart Struct. Syst., 2010, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 197–209.10.12989/sss.2010.6.3.197 ↗
6. Kim, S., Uprety, B., Adams, D.O., et al., Acoustic emission based damage characterization in composite plates using low-velocity impact testing, in Int. Workshop Struct. Health Monit., 2015.10.12783/SHM2015/185 ↗
7. Minozzi, M., Caldarelli, G., Pietronero, L., et al. Dynamic fracture model for acoustic emission, Eur. Phys. J. B., 2003, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 203–207.10.1140/epjb/e2003-00336-7 ↗
8. Ito, K. and Enoki, M., Analysis of high active AE signal by continuous waveform recorder, Key Eng. Mater., 2007, vol. 353–358, pp. 2399–2402.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.353-358.2399 ↗
9. Hamdi, S.E., Le, A.D., Plantier, G., et al., Damage mechanisms identification of polymer based composite materialsstring: time-frequency investigation of acoustic emission data based on Hilbert-Huang, in Acoustics 2012, Nantes, France, 2012, pp. 155–159.
10. Che, C. and Hu, D., Features extraction of tool cutting AE signals based on Hilbert-Huang transformation, in Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Control, IEEE, 2010, pp. 167–171.
11. Grosse, C. and Ohtsu, M., Acoustic Emission Testing, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 2008.10.1007/978-3-540-69972-9 ↗
12. Zhao Mei-yun, Lili, and Chen Bao-jia, Wavelet envelope spectrum analysis on acoustic emission signals of rolling bearing fault, Bearing, 2008, no. 4, pp. 38–41. (in Chinese)
13. Liu Guo Hua, The research on the key technologies in acoustic emission signal processing, Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, Zhejiang University, HangZhou, PRC, 2008. (in Chinese)
14. Zhou, W., He, Y., and Lu, X., Acoustic emission in scratch processes of metals, Insight Nondestr. Test. Cond. Monit., 2015, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 635–642.10.1784/insi.2015.57.11.635 ↗
15. Wang, Y., Gao, A., Zheng, S., et al. Experimental investigation of the fault diagnosis of typical faults in reciprocating compressor valves, Arch. Proc. — Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 1989–1996, vols. 203–210, 2015, vol. 230, no. 13, pp. 387–392.
16. Han, Zh., Luo, H., and Wang, H., Effects of strain rate and notch on acoustic emission during the tensile deformation of a discontinuous yielding material, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, vol. 528, nos. 13–14, pp. 4372–4380.10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.042 ↗
17. Vinogradov. A, and Lazarev, A., Continuous acoustic emission during intermittent plastic flow in α-brass, Scripta Mater., 2012, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 745–748.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.053 ↗
18. Li Jiawei and Chen Jimao, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, China Machine Press, 2012, 2nd Ed. (in Chinese)
19. ASTM E 1316-02a. Standard terminology for nondestructive examinations. Section B: Acoustic emission, in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2003.
20. Dongsheng, L.I., Qian, H.U., and Jinping, O.U., Fatigue damage characterization of carbon fiber reinforced polymer bridge cables: wavelet transform analysis for clustering acoustic emission data, Sci. China Technol. Sci., 2011, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 379–387.10.1007/s11431-010-4198-7 ↗
21. Chai, M.Y., Li, L.C., Li Y.Q., et al., Investigation on acoustic emission characteristics from Q345R during fatigue crack propagation, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2013, vol. 331, pp. 61–64.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.331.61 ↗
22. Martinez-Gonzalez, E., Ramirez, G., Romeu, J., et al., Damage induced by a spherical indentation test in tool steels detected by using acoustic emission technique, Exp. Mech., 2015, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 449–458.10.1007/s11340-014-9959-y ↗
23. Polito, F., Petri, A., Pontuale, G., et al., Analysis of metal cutting acoustic emissions by time series models, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 897–903.10.1007/s00170-009-2357-4 ↗
24. Kilundu, B., Chiementin, X., Duez, J., et al., Cyclostationarity of acoustic emissions (AE) for monitoring bearing defects, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2011, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2061–2072.10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.01.020 ↗
25. Zhang, L., Ozevin, D., Hardman, W., et al., Fatigue crack growth monitoring of idealized gearbox spline component using acoustic emission, in SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. + Nondestr. Eval. Health Monit., Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 2016. doi: 980409-980409-11.
26. Tian, S.G., Geng Rong sheng, Beijing, et al., Parameter analysis of acoustic emission signals, Nondestr. Test., 2002. (in Chinese)
27. Zhang, Z.Q., Li, G.L., Wang, H.D., et al., Investigation of rolling contact fatigue damage process of the coating by acoustics emission and vibration signals, Tribol. Int., 2011, vol. 47, pp. 25–31.
28. Ministry of Construction of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete: GB/T 50081-2002, China Archit. & Build. Press, 2003.
29. Shen Gong-tian, Geng Rong-sheng, and Liu Shi-feng, Locating sources of continuous acoustic emission, Nondestr. Test., 2002, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 164–167. (in Chinese)