Distribution of Magnetic Flux in a Ferromagnetic Material in the Presence of a Nonferromagnetic Gap in the Composite Circuit
Source abstract
Abstract
Comparative analysis of the distribution of magnetic-induction vector components over the volume of a bulk homogeneous sample of 40Kh steel has been carried out under its local magnetization by an attached magnetic device in the absence of a gap in the composite “attached magnetic device–sample” circuit and in the presence of a nonferromagnetic gap under both poles of the attached magnetic device. It is shown that with the gap present in the composite circuit, the most significant drop in the magnetic flux density in the interpole zone of the object near its surface occurs in a section that coincides with the inner face of the electromagnet pole. The influence of the size of the gap in the composite “attached magnetic device–sample” circuit on the magnetic flux density has been investigated at different depths from the sample surface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Mikheev, M.N. and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnitnye metody strukturnogo analiza i nerazrushayushchego kontrolya Magnetic Methods of Structural Analysis and Nondestructive Testing, Moscow: Nauka, 1993.
2. Klyuev, V.V., Muzhitskii, V.F., Gorkunov, E.S., and Shcherbinin, V.E., Nerazrushayushchii kontrol’. Spravochnik v 8 t. T.6 Kn. 1. Magnitnye metody kontrolya Nondestructive Testing. A Handbook in 8 Vols. Vol. 6. Book 1. Magnetic Testing Methods, Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2006.
3. Gorkunov, E.S., Magnetic structural-phase analysis as applied to diagnosing and evaluating the lifetime of products and structural components. Part 1 {Electronic resource}, Diagn. Resour. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2015, no. 1, pp. 6–40. doi 10.17804/2410-9908.2015.1.006-040
4. Gorkunov, E.S., Magnetic Structural-phase analysis. Part II {Electronic resource}, Diagn. Resour. Mech. Mater. Struct., 2015, no. 3, pp. 6–50. doi 10.17804/2410-9908.2015.3.006-050
5. Bezlyud'ko, G.Ya., Muzhitskii, V.F., and Remezov, V.B., Series of portable structuroscope-instruments based on measuring the coercive force, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2003, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 289–296.10.1023/B:RUNT.0000009085.34384.ed ↗
6. Liu, T., Kikuchi, H., Ara, K., Kamada, Y., and Takahashi, S. Magnetomechanical effect of low carbon steel studied by two kinds of magnetic minor hyteresis loops, NDT&E Int., 2006, vol. 39, pp. 408–413.10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.12.001 ↗
7. Gorkunov, E.S. and Zakharov, V.A., Coercimeters with attached magnetic devices, Defektoskopiya, 1995., no. 8, pp. 69–88.
8. Gorkunov, E.S. and Tabachnik, V.P., Study of arrangement efficiency of Hall sensors of an attachable magnetic instrument used for recording the coercive force of a local area of an article, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 375–379.10.1134/S1061830908060016 ↗
9. Bakunov, A.S., Gorkunov, E.S., and Shcherbinin, V.E., Magnitnyi kontrol’ Magnetic Testing, Moscow: Spektr, 2011.
10. Mel’gui, M.A., Magnitnyi kontrol’ mekhanicheskikh svoistv stalei Magnetic Testing of Mechanical Properties of Steels, Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1980.
11. Kostin, V.N. and Bida, G.V., Magnetic structuroscope MS-2, Defektoskopiya, 1989, no. 2, pp. 21–24.
12. Shanaurin, A.M., Veksler, A.Z., Nichipuruk, A.P., Bida, G.V., and Vatolin, S.M., Magnetic structuroscope SM-401, Defektoskopiya, 2002, no. 6, pp. 41–48.
13. Kikuchi, H., Murakami, H., and Ara, K., Feasibility study for nondestructive evaluation of magnetic properties and hardness of two-layered specimens by magnetic single-yoke probe, NDT&E Int., 2012, vol. 46, pp. 1–6.10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.10.009 ↗
14. Wei, L., Guoming, C., Xiaokang, Y., Chuanrong, Z., and Tao, I., Analysis of the lift-off effect of a U-shaped ACFM system, NDT&E Int., 2013, vol. 53, pp. 31–35.10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.10.001 ↗
15. Kostin, V.N. and Vasilenko, O.N., Local measurement of the coercive-return induction in the presence of a gap in the transducer-object combined circuit, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 391–400.10.1134/S1061830912070042 ↗
16. Kostin, V.N. and Vasilenko, O.N., On new possibilities for making local measurements of the coercive force of ferromagnetic objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 401–410.10.1134/S1061830912070054 ↗
17. Shcherbinin, V.E. and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnitnyi kontrol' kachestva metallov Magnetic Quality Control of Metals, Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 1996.
18. Kostin, V.N., Tsar’kova, T.P., and Sazhina, E.Yu., Measurements of relative magnetic parameters of materials in tested components incorporated in closed circuits, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2001, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 10–19.10.1023/A:1016790932195 ↗
19. Bida, G.V. and Nichipuruk, A.P., Coercive force measurements in nondestructive testing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2000, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 707–727.10.1007/BF02759255 ↗
20. Ul’yanov, A.I., Zakharov, V.A., Merzlyakov, E.F., and Voronov, S.A., RF Patent no. 2035745. Attached device of a coercimeter, Byull. Izobret., 1995, no. 14, appl. no. 5026424/10, December 2,1991.
21. Bida, G.V., The effect of a gap between the poles of an attachable electromagnet and a tested component on coercimeter readings and methods for decreasing it Review, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 836–853.10.1134/S1061830910110070 ↗
22. Nichipuruk, A.P., Bida, G.V., Tsar’kova, T.P., Gobov, Y.L., Stashkov, A.N., and Povolotskaya, A.M., Decrease in the effect of a gap on coercimetry results when taking the properties of an attachable transducer into account, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 580–586.10.1134/S106183091008005X ↗
23. Mikheev, M.N., Topography of magnetic induction in products locally magnetized with attached electromagnet, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 1948, nos. 3–4, pp. 68–77.
24. Bida, G.V., On the depth of magnetization of bulk products by an attached electromagnet and the depth of evaluation of service properties, Defektoskopiya, 1999, no. 9, pp. 70–81.
25. Bida, G.V. and Sazhina, E.Yu., Optimization of operational characteristics of attached electromagnets, Defektoskopiya, 1996, no. 5., pp. 92–99.
26. Fridman, L.A., Tabachnik, V.P., and Chernova, G.S., Magnetization of bulk ferromagnetic products using attached electromagnets, Defektoskopiya, 1977, no. 4, pp. 104–112.
27. Mikheev, M.N., On the optimum size of attached electromagnet of a coercimeter for quality control of thermal and chemical-thermal treatment of steel and cast-iron products, Tr. Inst. Fiz. Met., 1959, no. 21.
28. Gorkunov, E.S., Nosov, P.A., Povolotskaya, A.M., Zadvorkin, S.M., and Dimitrov, R., Magnetic flux distribution in a locally magnetized ferromagnetic object, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 727–738.10.1134/S1061830916120093 ↗
29. Kostin, V.N., Lukinykh, O.N., Smorodinskii, Ya.G., and Kostin, K.V., Simulation of field and inductance spatial distribution in locally magnetized massive objects and optimization of U-shaped transducer design, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 403–410.10.1134/S1061830910060021 ↗