Coercimetry with Magnetization by a U-Shaped Electromagnet
Source abstract
Abstract
A method is proposed for measuring the coercive force using a U-shaped electromagnet with a gap between the electromagnet poles and the test sample. It is demonstrated that the device can operate in a dynamic mode under pulsed magnetization reversal. Numerical simulation and experimental results are compared.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Shcherbinin, V.E. and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnitnyy kontrol’ kachestva metallov (Magnetic Quality Control of Metals), Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 1996.
2. Bida, G.V., Nondestructive testing of mechanical properties of rolled steel (review): 1. Tests of strength and plastic properties, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2005, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 296–306.10.1007/s11181-005-0169-7 ↗
3. Kuznetsov, I.A., Magnitnyi strukturnyi analiz (Magnetic Structural Analysis), Sverdlovsk: Ural. Gos. Univ., 1984.
4. Mel’gui, M.A. and Matyuk, V.F., Testing mechanical properties of sheet steel in production stream, in Fizicheskie svoistva metallov i problemy nerazrushayushchego kontrolya (Physical Properties of Metals and Problems of Nondestructive Testing), Minsk: Nauka Tekh., 1978, pp. 57–75.
5. Ul’yanov, A.I. and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnetic structuroscopy of powdered steels (review), Defektoskopiya, 1995, no. 1, pp. 3–69.
6. Sandomirskii, S.G., Magnetic testing of physical and mechanical properties of mass-produced products in motion (review), Defektoskopiya, 1996, no. 7, pp. 25–45.
7. Matyuk, V.F., Pulsed magnetic method of nondestructive testing. The state-of-the-art and prospects, in Sb. tr. konf. posvyashchennoi 30-letiyu lab. magn. metod. kontrolya (Proc. Conf. Dedicated 30th Anniv. Lab. Magn. Control Methods), Matyuk, V.F., Ed., Minsk, 2001, pp. 11–33.
8. Matyuk, V.F., Goncharenko, S.A., Hartmann, H., and Reichelt, H., Modern state of nondestructive testing of mechanical properties and stamping ability of steel sheets in a manufacturing technological flow, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2003, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 347–380.10.1023/B:RUNT.0000011264.99280.de ↗
9. Gorkunov, E.S. and Zagainov, A.I., Magnitnye metody i pribory kontrolya kachestva izdelii poroshkovoi metallurgii (Methods and Devices for Magnetic Quality Control of Powder Metallurgy Products), Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 1996.
10. Sandomirskii, S.G., Application of pole magnetization in magnetic structural analysis (review), Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 586–609.10.1134/S106183090609004X ↗
11. Mikheev, M.N. and Gorkunov, E.S., Relationship between the magnetic properties and structural state of matter—the physical basis of magnetic structural analysis (review), Defektoscopiya, 1981, no. 8, pp. 5–21.
12. Zakharov, V.A. and Gorkunov, E.S., Coercimeters with attached magnetic devices, Defektoskopiya, 1995, no. 8, pp. 69—88.
13. Gorkunov, E.S. and Tabachnik, V.P., Study of arrangement efficiency of Hall sensors of an attachable magnetic instrument used for recording the coercive force of a local area of an article, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 375–379.10.1134/S1061830908060016 ↗
14. Nichipuruk, A.P., Stashkov, A.N., Kostin, V.N., Murikov, S.A., and Murikov, E.S., Coercimetric quality control of steel parts. The Urals school of coercimetry, V Mire NK, 2015, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 9–13.
15. Bida, G.V., The effect of a gap between the poles of an attachable electromagnet and a tested component on coercimeter readings and methods for decreasing it (review), Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 836–853.10.1134/S1061830910110070 ↗
16. Kostin V.N., Vasilenko, O.N., and Byzov A.V., DIUS-1.15M Mobile hardware–software structuroscopy system, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 654–661.10.1134/S1061830918090048 ↗
17. Nichipuruk, A.P., Bida, G.V., Tsar’kova, T.P., Gobov, Y.L., Stashkov, A.N., and Povolotskaya, A.M., Decrease in the effect of a gap on coercimetry results when taking the properties of an attachable transducer into account, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 580–586.10.1134/S106183091008005X ↗
18. Matyuk, V.F., Osipov, A.A., Delendik, M.N., Hartmann, H., and Reichelt, H., Investigation of the possibility of using additional parameters in pulsed magnetic testing of rolled steel sheets in a manufacturing technological flow, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2004, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 12–20.10.1023/B:RUNT.0000036424.52619.ef ↗
19. Gobov, Yu.L., Zhakov, S.V., and Mikhailov, A.V., Measuring coercive force in local domains of a sample, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 779–784.10.1134/S106183091711002X ↗