Coherent Reconstruction of Flaw Images during Detection of Echo Signals in a Separate Mode
Source abstract
Abstract
The possibility of using a scheme for separate detection of echo signals for obtaining high-quality flaw images is substantiated. A conventional algorithm for obtaining images by the projection method in the spectral space and an algorithm for obtaining images that is not limited by the approximation of a plane incident wave are considered. Coherent storage of images reconstructed from echo signals, which were detected in a separate scheme but at different positions of the radiator (transmitter), reduces the speckle-noise level and increases the resolution of flaw images. Positive and negative features of these algorithms are analyzed. Numerical and model experiments have demonstrated the feasibilities of different schemes of detecting echo signals for obtaining flaw images.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Badalyan, V.G., Vopilkin, A.Kh., Grebennikov, V.V., Grebennikov, D.V., and Tikhonov, D.S., Experience of Using Avgur Ultrasonic Computer Systems with Coherent Data Processing in Nuclear Power Engineering, 15-ya Rossiiskaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya konferentsiya “Nerazrushayushchii kontrol' i diagnostika” (Proc. of the 15th Russian Scientific and Technical Conference “Nondestructive Testing and Diagnostics”), Moscow: NPTs EKhO+, 1999.
2. Badalyan, V.G. and Vopilkin, A.Kh., Monitoring Welded Joints in Pipelines Using Automated Ultrasonic Testing Systems with Coherent Data Processing, V Mire Nerazrush. Kontrol., 2004, no. 4, pp. 22–27.
3. Burov, V.A., Goryunov, A.A., Saskovets, A.V., and Tikhonova, T.A., Inverse Scattering Problems in Acoustics (Review), Akust. Zh., 1986, vol. 32, no.4, pp. 433–449.
4. Goryunov, A.A. and Saskovets, A.V., Obratnye zadachi rasseyaniya v akustike (Inverse Scattering Problems in Acoustics), Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1989.
5. Hall, T.E., Doctor, S.R., Reid, L.D., Littlield, R.J., and Gilber, R.W., Implementation of Real-Time Ultrasonic SAFT System for Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Components, Acoust. Imaging, 1987, vol. 15, pp. 253–266.10.1007/978-1-4684-5320-1_23 ↗
6. Erhard, A., Lucht, B., Schulz, E., Montag, H.-J., Wustenberg, H., and Beine, U., Characterization of Defects in Austenitic Pipe Gird Welds, e-J. of Nondes. Testing Ultrasonics, 2000, vol. 5, no.9.
7. Osetrov, A.V., The Theory of Space-Time Diffraction Tomography for a Single Transceiver Scanning over a Plane, Akust. Zh., 1991, vol. 47, no.3, pp. 528–534.
8. Kovalev, A.V., Kozlov, V.N., Samokrutov, A.A., Shevaldykin, V.G., and Yakovlev, N.N., Echo-Pulse Method for Concrete Inspection. Noise and Spatial Selection, Defektoskopiya, 1990, no. 2, pp. 29–41.
9. Mayer, K., Markelein, R., Langenberg, K.J., and Kreutter, T., Three-Dimensional Imaging System Based on Fourier Transformation Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique, Ultrasonics, 1990, no. 28, pp. 241–255.10.1016/0041-624X(90)90091-2 ↗
10. Takahashi, F., Nagashima, Y., Tanaka, I., Igeta, M., and Nakada, S., Ultrasonic Sizing and Recognition of Cracks and Porosities in Weld Metals Using Acoustical Holographic Inspections, First International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components, 1998, Amsterdam, Amsterdam: 1998.
11. Badalyan, V.G. and Bazulin, E.G., Digital Reconstruction of Scatterers' Images by the Method of Projection in Spectral Space, Akust. Zh., 1988, vol. 34, no.2, pp. 222–231.
12. Aleshin, N.P., Belyi, V.E., Vopilkin, A.Kh., Voshchanov, A.K., Ermolov, I.N., and Gurvich, A.K., Metody akusticheskogo kontrolya metallov (Acoustic Methods for Testing Metals), Aleshin, N.P., Ed., Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1989.
13. Ermolov, I.N. and Lange, Yu.V., Nerazrushayshchii kontrol'. Spravochnik v 7-mi tomakh (Nondestructive Testing. Handbook in 7 Volumes.), Klyuev, V.V., Ed., vol. 3: Ultrasonic Testing, Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2004.
14. Soroko, L.M., Osnovy golografii i kogerentnoi optiki (Fundamentals of Holography and Coherent Optics), Moscow: Nauka, 1971.
15. Korn, G.A. and Korn, T.M., Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers. Definitions, Theorems, and Formulas for Reference and Review, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Translated under the title Spravochnik po matematike dlya nauchnykh rabotnikov i inzhenerov, Moscow: Nauka, 1970.
16. Badalyan, V.G., Bazulin, E.G., Vopilkin, A.Kh., and Tikhonov, D.S., Use of Transformed Waves for Obtaining Images of Vertical Cracks from Multi-Frequency Acoustic Holograms, Defektoskopiya, 1993, no. 6, pp. 3–9.
17. Devaney, A.J., Fundamental Limitation Inverse Source and Scattering Problem in NDT, Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondes. Evaluation A, 1986, vol. 5, pp. 303–317.10.1007/978-1-4615-7763-8_31 ↗
18. Vasilenko, G.I., Taratorin, A.M., Vosstanovlenie izobrazhenii (Reconstruction of Images), Moscow: Radio i Svyaz', 1986.
19. Nahamoo, D., Pan, B.X., and Kak, A.S., Synthetic Aperture Diffraction Tomography and Its Interpolation Free Implementation, IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., 1984, vol. SU-31, pp. 218–229.10.1109/T-SU.1984.31502 ↗
20. Bazulin, E.G., Feasibility of Double Scanning in Ultrasonic Testing for Improving the Quality of Scatterer Images, Akust. Zh., 2001, vol. 47, no.6, pp. 741–745.
21. Kovalev, A.V., Kozlov, V.N., Samokrutov, A.A., Shevaldykin, V.G., and Yakovlev, N.N., Echo-Pulse Method for Concrete Inspection. Noise and Spatial Selection, Defektoskopiya, 1990, no. 2, pp. 29–41.
22. Goodmen, J., Introduction to Fourier Optics, New York, 1968. Translated under the title Vvedenie v Fur'e optiku, Moscow: Mir, 1970.
23. Bakut, P.A., Mandrosov, V.I., Matveev, I.N., and Ustinov, I.D., Teoriya kogerentnykh izobrazhenii (The Theory of Coherent Images), Moscow: Radio i Svyaz', 1987.
24. Vainberg, F.I. and Faingoz, M.L., Effect of Digitization and Interpolation of Projections on Sensitivity of X-ray Computational Tomography. II: Projection Digitization and Interpolation Error, Defektoskopiya, 1987, no. 11, pp. 76–80.