journal article·2012-05

Bayesian reassessment of the number of flaws in a pipeline

V. V. Kuznetsov, M. G. Malyukova, S. A. Timashev

Publisher page

Abstract

A practical method for correcting an estimate of the true number of defects in a pipeline after performing in-tube flaw detection and subsequent verification of measurement results by a second independent verifying instrument is presented. A direct correction method was initially proposed by one of the authors [1]. A more precise method, which is based on the Bayesian procedure, is considered in this study. The problem of predicting the most probable number of true flaws in each interval of changes in the flaw parameters (hereinafter, the flaw depth is considered) is solved on the basis of data from the inspection of detected and actual flaws in a pipeline. These results can be used for the evaluation of the quality of a performed in-tube inspection and the quality of in-tube and verifying instruments, when solving appropriate problems of pipeline reliability (as the input data), and when planning inspections on the basis of risk assessment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Timashev, S.A. and Kuzmin, A.B., A Powerful Tool for Assessing Locations of Defects Missed-out by ILI, Proceedings of IPC 2004 Int. Pipeline Conf., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2004.10.1115/IPC2004-0296 ↗
2. Timashev, S.A., Pipeline ILI Quality Metrics, Proceedings of IPC 2004 Int. Pipeline Conf., Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2003.
3. Carlin, B.P. and Louis, T.A., Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall, 2008.10.1201/b14884 ↗
4. Gamerman H., Markov Chain Monte Carlo, Chapman and Hall, 1997.
5. Gelman A., Caerlin J., Stern H. and Rubin D., Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, 1996.10.1201/9780429258411 ↗
6. Howson, C. and Urbach, P., Scientific Reasoning: the Bayesian Approach, Open Court Publ. Company, 2005.
7. Hamada, M.S., Wilson, A.G., Reese, C.C., and Martz, H.F., Bayesian Reliability, Springer, 2008, vol. XVI, p. 436.
8. Smith, J.Q., Decision Analysis — a Bayesian Approach, Chapman and Hall, 1995.
9. Timashev, S.A., Malyukova, M.G., Poluian, L.V., and Bushinskaya, A.V., Internet-Oriented Method of Reliability Analysis of On-Shore Pipelines with Growing Defects, IPC 2008-64545, Int. Pipeline Conf. & Exposition, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2008.10.1115/IPC2008-64545 ↗