Layered Composite Hydrogenated Films of Zirconium and Niobium: Production Method and Testing Using Thermo EMF (Thermoelectric Method)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Layered materials incorporating hydrogen were obtained using Nb/Zr films with varying numbers of layers from 50 to 100. The films were deposited on a silicon substrate using a vacuum magnetron sputtering method on a dedicated setup. The film thickness varied from 10 to 50 nm. The resulting material was hydrogenated with protons on a TPU electrostatic generator with an energy of up to 1.2 MeV. The deposition modes for nanoscale metallic multilayer Zr/Nb systems were determined: for a Zr target the specific power of the sputtering system was 37.9 W/cm2, and for a Nb target it was 26.4 W/cm2. A coating with clear boundaries between individual layers of zirconium and niobium was obtained. It was shown that the optimal conditions for studying nanoscale Zr/Nb layers are a pressure of 700 Pa, a power of 40 W, a frequency of 2 kHz, and a plasma filling factor of 12.5% for coatings with individual layer thicknesses of 100 nm. For coatings with layer thicknesses from 10 to 50 nm, the optimal conditions are a pressure of 650 Pa, a power of 40 W, and a frequency of 1 kHz. The thermo EMF method (GOST (State Standard) 25315–82) was used for testing. It was found out that after proton irradiation, an intensive accumulation of hydrogen atoms occurs near the interfaces; it reduces the structure defectiveness and entails a change in the thermo EMF up to the inversion of its sign. The hydrogen distribution is predominantly bimodal, with local maxima in hydrogen concentration observed at the Nb/Zr interfaces, while accumulation at the Zr/Nb interface is considerably lower. Hydrogen localization near interfaces primarily occurs around zirconium.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, Y., Feng, Z., Haq, L., Huang, L., Xin, Ch., Wang, Y., Bilotti, E., Essa, Kh., Zhang, H., Li, Z., Yan, F., and Peijs, T., A review on functionally graded materials and structures via additive manufacturing: From multi-scale design to versatile functional properties, Adv. Mater. Technol., 2020, vol. 5, p. 1900981.10.1002/admt.201900981 ↗
2. Bhattacharyya, A. and Maurice, D. Residual stresses in functionally graded thermal barrier coatings, Mech. Mater., 2019, vol. 129, pp. 50–56.10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.11.002 ↗
3. Sufiarov, V.Sh., Orlov, A.V., Borisov, E.V., Polozov, I.A., Popovich, A.A., Chukovenkova, M.O., Soklakov, A.V., and Mikhalyuk, D.S., Computer modelling of uniaxial tension of functionally gradient material produced by additive manufacturing, Tech. Phys., 2021, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 23–27.10.1134/S1063784221010199 ↗
4. Onishchenko, D.V., Popovich, A.A., and Wang, X.S., Synthesis of the nanodimensional powder of tungsten carbide for the development of functional nanocomposite coatings, Russ. J. Nonferrous Met., 2013, vol. 54, pp. 246–251.10.3103/S1067821213030127 ↗
5. Popovich, A.A., Additive technologies as a new way to create promising functional materials, Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., 2020, no. 1 (775), pp. 19–25.
6. Popovich, A.A., Borisov, E.V., Sufiarov, V.Sh., and Popovich, A.A., Formation of the specified properties of the functional gradient Inconel 718 alloy using additive technologies, Metalloved. Term. Obrab. Met., 2018, no. 11 (761), pp. 14–22.10.1007/s11041-019-00343-z ↗
7. Orlov, A.V., Orlov, V.S., Sufiiarov, V.S., Borisov, E.V., Polozov, I.A., Masaylo, D.V., Popovich, A.A., Chu-kovenkova, M.O., Soklakov, A.V., and Mikhalyuk, D.S., Numerical simulation of the inelastic behavior of a structurally graded material, Lett. Mater., 2019, no. 9, pp. 97–102.10.22226/2410-3535-2019-1-97-102 ↗
8. Silverstein, R. and Eliezer, D., Hydrogen trapping in 3D–printed (additive manufactured) Ti–6Al–4V, Mater. Charact., 2018, vol. 144, pp. 297–304.10.1016/j.matchar.2018.07.029 ↗
9. Metalnikov, P., Eliezer, D., and Ben-Hamu, G., Hydrogen trapping in additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2021, vol. 811, p. 141050.10.1016/j.msea.2021.141050 ↗
10. Panin, V.E., Panin, S.V., and Shugurov, A.R., The effect of nanoscale mesoscopic structural states associated with lattice curvature on the mechanical behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Phys. Mesomech., 2020, vol. 23, pp. 457–465.10.1134/S1029959920060016 ↗
11. Boyangin, E.N., Perevalova, O.B., Panin, A.V., and Martynov, S.A., The effect of electron beam welding on the microstructure and microhardness of 3D-printed products from titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2021, vol. 122, pp. 41–147.10.1134/S0031918X21020034 ↗
12. Navi, N.U. and Sabatani, E., Hydrogen effects on electrochemically charged additive manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) and wrought Ti–6Al–4V alloys, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, vol. 45, pp. 25523–25540.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.277 ↗
13. Brosh, E., Navi, N.U., Rozen, B.A., and Eliaz, N., Microvoids in electrochemically hydrogenated titanium-based alloys, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, vol. 46, pp. 27234–27242.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.187 ↗
14. Svetlizky, D., Das, M., Zheng, B., Vyatskikh, A., Bose, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Schoenung, J.M., Enrique, J., Lavernia, E.J., and Eliaz, N., Directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing: Physical characteristics of defects, challenges and applications, Mater. Today, 2021, vol. 49, pp. 271–295.10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.020 ↗
15. Doğu, M.N., Ezen, Z., Davud, K., and Tan, E., Microstructural and texture evolution during thermohydrogen processing of Ti6-Al-4V alloys produced by electron beam melting, Mater. Charact., 2020, vol. 168, p. 110549.10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110549 ↗
16. Bilgin, G.M., Esen, Z., Akın, S.K., and Dericioglu, A.F., Optimization of the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V alloy fabricated by selective laser melting using thermohydrogen processes, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, vol. 700, pp. 574–582.10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.016 ↗
17. Callisti, M., Karlik, M., and Polcar, T., Competing mechanisms on the strength of ion–irradiated Zr/Nb nanoscale multilayers: Interface strength versus radiation hardening, Scripta Mater., 2018, vol. 152, pp. 31–35.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.039 ↗
18. Sen, H.S. and Polcar, T., Vacancy-interface-helium interaction in Zr-Nb multi-layer system: A first-principles study, J. Nucl. Mater., 2019, vol. 518, pp. 11–20.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.030 ↗
19. Monclús, M.A., Callisti, M., Polcar, T., Lozano-Perez, S., Yang, L.W., Lorca, J., and Molina-Ajdareguia, J.M., Selective oxidation-induced strengthening of Zr/Nb nanoscale multilayers, Acta Mater., 2017, vol. 122, pp. 1–10.10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.021 ↗
20. Daghbouj, D., Callisti, M., Sen, H.S., Karlic, M., Cech, J., Vronka, M., Havranek, vol., Capec, J., Minarec, P., Bobar, B., and Polcar, T., Interphase boundary layer-dominated strain mechanisms in Cu+ implanted Zr–Nb nanoscale multilayers, Acta Mater., 2021, vol. 202, pp. 317–330.10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.072 ↗
21. Callisti, M., Lozano-Perez, S., and Polcar, T., Structural and mechanical properties of $$\gamma $$-irradiated Zr/Nb multilayer nanocomposites, Mater. Lett., 2016, vol. 163, pp. 138–141.10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.057 ↗
22. Zr/Nb multilayers as a function of individual layer thickness, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, vol. 632, pp. 137–146.10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.071 ↗
23. Monclús, M.A., Callisti, M., Polcar, T., Yang, L.W., Molina-Ajdareguia, J.M., and Lorca, J., Effect of layer thickness on the mechanical behaviour of oxidation-strengthened Zr/Nb nanoscale multilayers, J. Mater. Sci., 2018, vol. 53, pp. 5860–5878.10.1007/s10853-017-1665-6 ↗
24. Varlamov, A.A., Kavokin, A.vol., Lukyanchuk, I.A., and Sharapov, S.G., Anomalous thermoelectric and thermomagnetic properties of graphene, Phys.-Usp., 2012, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1146–1151.10.3367/UFNe.0182.201211j.1229 ↗
25. Geim, K.L., Graphene: Status and prospects, Science, 2009, vol. 324, p. 1530.10.1126/science.1158877 ↗
26. Grosse, K.L., Bae, M.H., Lian, F., and King, W.P., Nanoscale Joule heating, Peltier cooling and current crowding at graphene–metal contacts, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, vol. 6, pp. 287–290.10.1038/nnano.2011.39 ↗
27. Pick, M.A. and Sonnenberg, K.A., Model for atomic hydrogen–metal interactions—Application to recycling, recombination and permeation, J. Nucl. Mater., 1985, vol. 131, pp. 208–220.10.1016/0022-3115(85)90459-3 ↗
28. Serra, E., Benamati, G., and Ogorodnikova, O.V., Hydrogen isotopes transport parameters in fusion reactor materials, J. Nucl. Mater., 1998, vol. 255, pp. 105–115.10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00038-5 ↗
29. Puls, M.P., The Effect of Hydrogen and Hydrides on the Integrity of Zirconium Alloy Components: Delayed Hydride Cracking, London: Springer Sci. Bus. Media, 1991, pp. 237–246.
30. Choudhuri, G., Mukherjee, P., Gayathri, N., Kain, V., Kumar, M.K., Srivastava, D., Basu, S., Mukherjee, D., and Dey, G.K., Effect of heavy ion irradiation and $$\alpha + \beta $$ phase heat treatment on oxide of Zr–2.5Nb pressure tube material, J. Nucl. Mater., 2017, vol. 489, pp. 22–32.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.03.032 ↗
31. Xu, F., Zhang, X., and Zhang, H., A review on functionally graded structures and materials for energy absorption, Eng. Struct., 2018, vol. 171, pp. 309–325.10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.094 ↗
32. Wang, F., Li, R., Ding, C., Wan, J., Yu, R., and Wang, Z., Effect of catalytic Ni coating with different depositing time on the hydrogen storage properties of ZrCo alloy, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, vol. 41, pp. 17421–17432.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.077 ↗
33. Gao, B., Hao, S., Zou, J., Wu, W., Tu, G., and Dong, C., Effect of high current pulsed electron beam treatment on surface microstructure and wear and corrosion resistance of an AZ91HP magnesium alloy, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2007, vol. 201, pp. 6297–6303.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.036 ↗
34. Chernov, I.P., Ivanova, S.V., Krening, M.K., Koval, N.V., Larionov, V.V., Lider, A.M., Stepanova, E.N., Stepanova, O.M., and Cherdantsev, Yu.P., Properties and structural state of the surface layer of a zirconium alloy modified by a pulsed electron beam and saturated with hydrogen, Zh. Tekh. Fiz., vol. 57, pp. 392–398.10.1134/S1063784212030024 ↗
35. Lider, A.M., Larionov, V.V., and Syrtanov, M.S., Hydrogen concentration measurements at titanium layers by means of thermo-EMF, Key Eng. Mater., 2016, vol. 683, pp. 199–202.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.683.199 ↗
36. Askhatov, A., Larionov, V.V., and Kudiyarov, V.N. Analysis of hydrogenated zirconium alloys irradiated with gamma-rays, MATEC Web Conf., 2017, vol. 102, pp. 1003–1006.10.1051/matecconf/201710201003 ↗
37. Zvyagin, I.P., Kineticheskie yavleniya v neuporyadochennykh poluprovodnikakh (Kinetic Phenomena in Disordered Semiconductors), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1984.
38. Demishev, S. V., Kondrin, M. V., Pronin, A. A., Sluchanko, N. E., Samarin, N. A., Lyapin, A. G., and Biscupski, G., Thermopower in the hopping conductivity region: Transition from Mott’s to Zvyagin’s formula, JETP Lett., 1998, vol. 68, pp. 842–847.10.1134/1.567803 ↗
39. Mott, N.F. and Davis, E.A., Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012, 2nd ed.
40. Antonova, E.E. and Looman, D.C., Finite elements for thermoelectric device analysis in ANSYS, Int. Conf. Thermoelectr. ICT. Proc. IEEE (Clemson, 2005), pp. 200–203.
41. Lotkov, A.I., Grishkov, V.N., Laptev, R.S., Mironov, Yu.P., Zhapova, D.Yu., Girsova, N.V., Gusarenko, A.A., Barmina, E.G., and Kashina, O.N., Crystal structure defects in titanium nickelide after ABC pressing at lowered temperature, Materials, 2022, vol. 15, pp. 1–15.10.3390/ma15124298 ↗
42. Callisti, M., Karlik, M., and Polcar, T., Competing mechanisms on the strength of ion–irradiated Zr/Nb nanoscale multilayers: Interface strength versus radiation hardening, Scripta Mater., 2018, vol. 152, pp. 31–35.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.039 ↗
43. Xu, Shupeng, Larionov, V.V., Soldatov, A., and Chang, J., Analysis for hydrogen concentration in titanium alloys using multi–frequency eddy current, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2020, vol. 70, p. 1001408.10.1109/TIM.2020.3017899 ↗