Mirror-Shadow Method of Ultrasonic Testing of the Railroad Wheelset Axles Using the Electromagnetic-Acoustic Method of Wave Generation and Reception
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The amplitude of the received signals during the ultrasonic testing of the railroad wheelset axles using the mirror-shadow method is significantly influenced by the quality of contact of the piezoelectric transducer with the cylindrical surface of the test object compared with the testing of objects with flat surfaces. The key reasons influencing the results of testing are the condition of the input surface, its curvature, as well as the application force of the piezoelectric transducer. When using electromagneticacoustic transducers, the requirements for surface quality are much lower, and this reduces the probability of errors associated with the contact quality on a cylindrical surface during acceptance ultrasonic testing by the mirror-shadow method of the railroad wheelset axles after manufacture and repair.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Danilov, V.N., Analysis of signals observed from the lateral surface during ultrasonic testing of a cylindrical article with a normal probe, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2004, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 717–724.10.1007/s11181-005-0048-2 ↗
2. Bikadorov, V.V., Kireeva, M.A., and Fatyanova, O.A., Stabilization of the acoustic contact to ensure metrological accuracy of measurements during ultrasonic inspection of cylindrical parts, Vestn. Lugansk Nats. Univ., 2020, no. 7 (37), pp. 35–38.
3. Kazakov, V.V., An amplitude-phase method for testing acoustic contact of ultrasonic transducer, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, no. 3, pp. 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1134/S013030821903001110.1134/S0130308219030011 ↗
4. Danilov, V.N., On some features of ultrasonic inspection of axles of wheel sets of rolling stock from the side surface, Tyazh. Mashinostr., 2019, no. 10, pp. 19–25.
5. Markov, A.A. and Ivanov, G.A., Investigation of the method of detecting longitudinal cracks in the rail head, Vestn. Izhevsk Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 2019, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 46–56. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2019-4-46-5610.22213/2413-1172-2019-4-46-56 ↗
6. Tarabrin, V.F., Comparison of characteristics of search systems of mobile means of rail flaw detection, Kontrol’. Diagn., 2020, vol. 23, no. 10 (268), pp. 40–48.10.14489/td.2020.10.pp.040-048 ↗
7. Martinenko, A.V., On the Issue of Interpretating Echograms in the Contact, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 23–25. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013030822201003110.31857/S0130308222010031 ↗
8. Dimkin, G.Ya., Kirikov, A.V., and Bondarchuk, K.A., Immersion testing of curved profile objects by surface ultrasonic waves, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 679–688. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013030822208003610.31857/S0130308222080036 ↗
9. Danilov, V.N., Models for calculating the echo signal recorded by an inclined transducer with a rectangular piezo plate on an SO-3 sample, Kontrol’. Diagn., 2019, no. 1, pp. 4–15. https://doi.org/10.14489/td.2019.01.pp.004-01510.14489/td.2019.01.pp.004-015 ↗
10. Volkova, L.V. and Platunov, A.V., The use of multiple mirror-shadow method for ultrasonic inspection of the feather of the sole of the rail, Vestn. Izhevsk Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 2019, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 38–45. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2019-4-38-4510.22213/2413-1172-2019-4-38-45 ↗
11. Khlybov, A.A., Uglov, A.L., Ryabov, D.A., and Anosov, M.S., Assessment of damage to structural metal materials by acoustic methods, Vestn. Izhevsk Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 2022, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 18–26. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2022-4-18-2610.22213/2413-1172-2022-4-18-26 ↗
12. Pavros, S.K., On the selection of the optimal operating frequency for ultrasonic pulse-echo inspection of products with a cylindrical rough surface, Defektoskopiya, 1969, no. 4, pp. 53–58.
13. Ushakov, V.M., Shcherbinskii, V.G., and Semikin, I.V., Features of the formation of acoustic fields of inclined transducers in the control of products with a spherical surface, Defektoskopiya, 1985, no. 1, pp. 34–39.
14. Danilov, V.N., On the effect of the cylindrical boundary of the product on the radiation field of a direct converter, Defektoskopiya, 1994, no. 3, p. 72.
15. Michurov, A.V. and Sokolkin, A.V., A correction factor for the amplitude adjustment for the pulse echo ultrasonic inspection of components with curved surfaces, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 14–22.10.1134/S106183091601006X ↗
16. Dimkin, G.Ya., Shelukhin, A.A., and Anisimov, V.N., Improvement of the technique of echo-pulse ultrasonic control of rails in production, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, no. 8, pp. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1134/S013030821908002510.1134/S0130308219080025 ↗
17. Murav’eva, O.V., Brester, A.F., and Murav’ev, V.V., Comparative sensitivity of informative parameters of electromagnetic-acoustic mirror-shadow multiple reflections method during bar stock testing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2022, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 689–704. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013030822208004810.31857/S0130308222080048 ↗
18. Petrov, K.V., Murav’eva, O.V., Mishkin, Yu.V., and Basharova, A.F., Modeling magnetic, electric, and acoustic fields of a pass-through transducer when testing cylindrical objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, no. 2, pp. 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1134/S013030821902002710.1134/S0130308219020027 ↗
19. Murav’eva, O.V. and Petrov, K.V., Acoustic field under pulsed transmission–reception at the surface of an elliptic cylinder, Acoust. Phys., 2019, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106377101901006810.1134/S1063771019010068 ↗
20. Murav’ev, V.V., Murav’eva, O.V., and Petrov, K.V., Nerazrushayuschii kontrol’ tsilindricheskikh izdelii s ispol’zovaniem prokhodnykh elektromagnitno-akusticheskikh preobrazovatelei. Monografiya (Nondestructive Testing of Cylindrical Products Using Through-Pass Electromagnetic and Acoustic Transducers. A Monograph), Izhevsk: Izd. Izhevsk. Gos. Tekh. Univ., 2022.
21. Murav’ev, V.V., Murav’eva, O.V., and Vladikin, A.L., Acoustic and electromagnetic properties of maraging iron–chromium–nickel alloy with addition of copper in mechanical tension, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2023, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 515–523. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013030822305002010.31857/S0130308223050020 ↗
22. Murav’ov, V.V., Strizhak, V.A. and Pryakhin, A.V., Investigation of internal stresses in metal structures by the acoustoelasticity method, Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater., 2016, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 52–57.
23. Dimkin, G.Ya. and Lokhov, V.P., Once again on the effect of the roughness of the surface of the product on the results of narrow normal PET, V Mire NK, 2007, no. 1 (35), pp. 25–26.
24. Murav’eva, O.V., Murav’ev, V.V., Bogdan, O.P., and Platunov, A.V., Ul’trazvukovoi kontrol’. Fizicheskie osnovy. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov VUZov I professional’noi podgotovki spetsialistov v oblasti nerazrushayuschego kontrolya (Ultrasonic Monitoring. Physical Basics. Study Guide for Students of Universities and Professional Training of Specialists in the Field of Nondestructive Testing), Izhevsk: Izd. Izhevsk. Gos. Tekhn. Univ., 2022.