Testing for Defects in Pulsed Magnetic Field Transmitted Through Metal
Source abstract
Abstract
We present experimental dependences $$U(t)$$ of electric voltage on time $$t$$ picked up from an induction magnetic head (MH) moving relative to a magnetic carrier (MC) with the records of the magnetic fields due to a defect in an aluminum object. The contact access to the surface of a metal object above which there is a layer of air and a solid dielectric in an arbitrary proportion and with a total thickness of more than 5 mm is completely excluded. There is also no access to the rear side of the object, as it is a massive dielectric. An object with a magnetic field is exposed to a complex-shaped magnetic-field pulse with a duration from 1 to 200 $${{\mu s}}$$ . The studies were carried out in a field that has passed through metal. The raster images of hidden holes with diameters of 3 and 6 mm in 0.67 mm thick aluminum layers of samples composed of aluminum layers of various thickness separated by dielectric (air) layers were obtained. The thickness of metal layers in the samples was 1.96 and 2.96 mm. The measurements were carried out in hard-to-reach places of the samples. The algorithm of the developed method is compiled. The method makes it possible to significantly increase the sensitivity and accuracy of characterizing defects and to monitor areas of objects where testing by other methods is impossible.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Fal'kevich, A.S. and Khusanov, M.Kh., Magnitograficheskii kontrol' svarnykh soyedinenii (Magnetographic Testing of Welded Joints), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1966.
2. Kozlov, V.S., Tekhnika magnitograficheskoi defektoskopii (Magnetographic Nondestructive Testing Technique), Minsk: Vysheish. Shkola, 1976.
3. Mikhailov, S.P. and Shcherbinin, V.E., Fizicheskiye osnovy magnitograficheskoi defektoskopii (The Physical Basics of Magnetographic Nondestructive Testing), Moscow: Nauka, 1992.
4. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Hysteretic interference of time-overlapping magnetic field pulses, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 949–956.10.1134/S1061830919120088 ↗
5. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Imaging electric signals of a magnetic field transducer with hysteretic interference for testing metals in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 907–914.10.1134/S1061830920110066 ↗
6. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., A method of pulsed magnetic testing for discontinuities in objects made of diamagnetic and paramagnetic metals using a magnetic carrier, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 877–886.10.1134/S1061830918120082 ↗
7. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Detecting extended complex-shaped defects in electroconductive plates using a magnetic carrier, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 217–224.10.1134/S1061830919030094 ↗
8. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Testing for discontinuities in metals using film flux, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 48–58.10.1134/S106183091901008X ↗
9. Foerster, F., Nondestructive testing by the method of stray magnetic fields. Theoretical and experimental foundations for detecting surface defects of finite and infinite depth, Defektoskopiya, 1984, no. 12, pp. 13–18.
10. Egorov, A.V. and Polyakov, V.V., Eddy current testing of metallic materials using projection methods, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 377–384.10.1134/S1061830918050042 ↗
11. Atavin, V.G., Uzkikh, A.A., and Iskhuzhin, R.R., Tuning out from base electric conductivity in conductive-coating thickness gauging, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 77–83.10.1134/S1061830918010023 ↗
12. Astakhov, V.I., Danilina, E.M., and Ershov, Yu.K., On the question of inspecting the plate with a crack by the eddy-current method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 182–191.10.1134/S1061830918030038 ↗
13. Lukhvich, A.A., Bulatov, O.V., and Luk’yanov, I.K., Possibilities of the magnetodynamic method for testing the thickness of coatings with nonuniform properties (experiment), Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 779–785.10.1134/S1061830909110047 ↗
14. Sukhanov, D.Ya. and Sovpel’, E.S., Magnetic induction tomography of Electrical circuits and devices, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., 2015, vol. 58, no. 10/3, pp. 73–75.
15. Novoslugina, A.P. and Smorodinsky, Ya.G., Analysis of the topography of stray magnetic fields in ferromagnetic products, Zavod. Lab. Diagn. Mater., 2021, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 33–37.10.26896/1028-6861-2021-87-2-33-37 ↗
16. Nikolaev, Yu.L., Shkatov, P.N., and Chernova, A.V., Studying a signal due to the tangential component of stray fluxes from a surface flaw detected with a vibrating induction transducer, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 372–376.10.1134/S1061830918050108 ↗