Active Thermal Testing of Impact Damage in 3D-Printed Composite Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using the method of ultrasonic infrared thermography, it has been shown that 3D printing technology prevents cracking of the edges of access holes in composites during their machining. It is expedient to evaluate the impact strength of composites by the relative change in the thermophysical characteristics in the zones of impact damage, based on the assumption that a higher impact energy leads to the more developed defects and, accordingly, to the greater relative changes in thermal inertia and thermal diffusivity. The impact resistances of Kevlar and carbon fiber composite specimens, as well as their hybrid, have been compared. The highest impact resistance was demonstrated by a hybrid sample of Kevlar and carbon fiber composite, in which the change in thermal inertia and thermal diffusivity after an impact with an energy of 15 J was 4 and 8%, respectively, compared with 10 and 9% for the CFRP and 15 and 11% for the Kevlar.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Fire effects on concrete materials · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. Giurgiutiu, V., SHM of aerospace composites—Challenges and opportunities, CAMX Conf. Proc., 2015, pp. 1–15.
2. Cantwell, W., Curtis, P., and Morton, J., An assessment of the impact performance of CFRP reinforced with high strain carbon fibers, Compos. Sci. Technol., 1986, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 133–148.10.1016/0266-3538(86)90039-4 ↗
3. Staroverov, O.A., Babushkin, A.V., and Gorbunov, S.M., Assessment of the degree of damage to carbon fiber composite materials under shock impact, Bull. PNIPU. Mekh., 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
4. Vavilov, V., Shirayev, V., and Kuimova, M., Time and phase domain thermal tomography of composites, Photonics, 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics504003110.3390/photonics5040031 ↗
5. Vavilov, V., Chulkov, A., Smotrov, A., Smotrova, S., and Moskovchenko, A., Characterizing impact damage in GFRP/CFRP composites by determining thermal effusivity/diffusivity, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2019, vol. 30, no. 3, p. 034003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab018e10.1088/1361-6501/ab018e ↗
6. Chulkov, A.O., Vavilov, V.P., Moskovchenko, A.I., and Pan, Y., Quantitative evaluation of water content in composite honeycomb structures by using one-sided IR thermography: Is there any promise? Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 2017, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.226243510.1117/12.2262435 ↗
7. Klyuev, V.V., Budadin, O.N., Abramova, E.V., Pichugin, A.N., and Kozel’skaya, S.O., Teplovoi kontrol' kompozitnykh konstruktsii v usloviyakh silovogo i udarnogo nagruzheniya (Thermal Testing of Composite Structures under Conditions of Force and Shock Loading), Moscow: Spektr, 2017.
8. Vavilov, V., Chulkov, A., and Derusova, D. IR thermographic characterization of low energy impact damage in carbon/carbon composite by applying optical and ultrasonic stimulation, Proc. SPIE 9105, Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Appl. XXXVI, 2014, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.204981010.1117/12.2049810 ↗
9. Kozel’skaya, S.O., Thermal method and means of control of textile armor barriers in the process of interaction with striking elements, Cand. Sci. Dissertation, MNPO “Spectrum,” Moscow, 2017.
10. Nickels, L., Additive manufacturing: A user’s guide, Metal Powder Rep., 2016, vol. 71, pp. 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mprp.2016.02.04510.1016/j.mprp.2016.02.045 ↗