Defect Analysis in Compressor Vanes Using Split Bregman Noise-Reduced Digital Industrial Radiography
Source abstract
Abstract
Detection and analysis of defects in the vanes of centrifugal compressors are invaluable as part of routine quality control and preventative maintenance procedures. Historically, radiography testing (RT) and more recently digital industrial radiography testing (DIR) has proved to be an indispensable nondestructive inspection method capable of providing high defect detection sensitivity. Radiographic images are intrinsically noisy and various digital image acquisition and processing methods have been employed to achieve improved selective region and bandwidth image quality. The noise in the RT images is usually random in nature and the quality of the image is often uniformly degraded by the resulting fogging effect. In this study, a modified form of the split Bregman (SB) algorithm was developed and applied to remove the blurring in the radiography images. The SB algorithm was successfully applied to radiographic images of compressor vanes to achieve noise reduction whilst retaining sufficient image details, enabling more effective information extraction of object structures and defects. The results of the study have shown marked and quantifiable improvement in defect detectability and analysis compared to the outcomes using original unprocessed images. The method was used successfully by industrial radiography experts to detect object deterioration due to pre-failure high-speed rotational loading of the vanes; the experts' preference for working with noise-subtracted images was demonstrated as part of the study. These evaluations were carried out after and before high-speed testing of the vanes. It was confirmed that the implemented method improved image quality and defect detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Huang, Y.M. and Yang, Sh.-An, A measurement method for air pressures in compressor vane segments, Measurement, 2008, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2005.11.02710.1016/j.measurement.2005.11.027 ↗
2. Osama Al-Hawaj, Theoretical modeling of sliding vane compressor with leakage, Int. J. Refrig., 2009, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1555–1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.07.00510.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.07.005 ↗
3. Lüdtke, K.H., Process Centrifugal Compressors, Basics, Function, Operation, Design, Application, Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09449-510.1007/978-3-662-09449-5 ↗
4. Ge, L. and Zhang, Y., Weld defect detection in industrial radiography based on image segmentation, Insight Nondestr. Test. Cond. Monit., 2011, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2011.53.5.26310.1784/insi.2011.53.5.263 ↗
5. Bing, L., Lei, Ch., Yuegen, W., and Mengqiu, G., 3D detection of internal defects for gas turbine blades, Insight Nondestr. Test. Cond. Monit., 2017, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2017.59.7.36410.1784/insi.2017.59.7.364 ↗
6. Wang, X., Wong, B., Tan, C., and Guan Tui, C., Automated crack detection for digital radiography aircraft wing inspection, Res. Nondestr. Eval. (RNDE), 2011, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 23.10.1080/09349847.2011.556543 ↗
7. Movafeghi, A., Mohammadzadeh, N., Yahaghi, E. Nekouei, J., Rostami, P., and Moradi, Gh., Defect detection of industrial radiography images of ammonia pipes by a sparse coding model, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2018, vol. 37, p. 3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-017-0458-910.1007/s10921-017-0458-9 ↗
8. Goldstein, T., Bresson, X., and Osher, S., Geometric applications of the split Bregman method: segmentation and surface reconstruction, J. Sci. Comput., 2010, vol. 45, nos. 1–3, pp. 272–293. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10915-009-9331-z10.1007/s10915-009-9331-z ↗
9. Goldstein, T. and Osher, S., The split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 2009, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1137/08072589110.1137/080725891 ↗
10. Getreuer, P., Rudin–Osher–Fatemi total variation denoising using split Bregman, Image Proces. On Line, 2012, no. 2, pp. 74–95. https://doi.org/10.5201/ipol.2012.g-tvd10.5201/ipol.2012.g-tvd ↗
11. Changli Feng, Jianxun Zhang, Rui Liang, and Zhifu Li, A method for lung boundary correction using split Bregman method and geometric active contour model, Comput. Math. Meth. Med., 2015, vol. 2015, p. 789485. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/78948510.1155/2015/789485 ↗
12. Ge Ma and Junfang Lin, Image restoration method based on partition and regularization for industrial X-ray images, 2020 Int. Symp. Auton. Syst. (ISAS) (Guangzhou, 2020), pp. 254–257.10.1109/ISAS49493.2020.9378856 ↗
13. Mahdi Mirzapour, Effat Yahaghi, and Amir Movafeghi, The performance of three total variation based algorithms for enhancing the contrast of industrial radiography images, Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2021, vol. 32, pp. 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2020.183629310.1080/09349847.2020.1836293 ↗
14. Matilda Wilson, Anthony Y. Aidoo, and Charles H. Acquah, Chest radiograph image enhancement: a total variation approach, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 2017, vol. 163, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca201791346610.5120/ijca2017913466 ↗
15. ISO 17636-2. Non-destructive testing of welds-radiographic testing. Part 2: X- and gamma-ray techniques with digital detectors, 2013.
16. EN 16407-2. Non-destructive testing—radiographic inspection of corrosion and deposits in pipes by X- and gamma rays. Part 2: Double wall radiographic inspection, 2014.
17. ISO19232-5. Non-destructive testing-image quality of radiographs. Part 5: Determination of the image unsharpness value using duplex wire-type image quality indicators, 2013.
18. Buades, A., Coll, B., and Morel, J.-M., A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one, Multiscale Model. & Simul., 2005, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 490–530.10.1137/040616024 ↗
19. Fan, L., Zhang, F., Fan, H., and Zhang, C., Brief review of image denoising techniques, Visual Comput. Ind. Biomed. Art, 2019, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
20. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E., Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D, 1992, vol. 60, nos. 1–4, pp. 259–268.10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F ↗
21. Caselles, V., Chambolle, A., and Novaga, M., Total variation in imaging, in: Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 1455–1499.
22. Yahaghi, E., Mirzapour, M., Movafeghi, A., and Rokrok, B., Interlaced bilateral filtering and wavelet thresholding for flaw detection in the radiography of weldments, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 2020, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 1–10.10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00119-y ↗
23. Yahaghi, E., Mirzapour, M., Movafeghi, A., Mohammadi Matin, P., and Rokrok, B., FISTA algorithm for radiography images enhancement with background blurring removal, Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2019, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 80–88.10.1080/09349847.2018.1476744 ↗
24. Hansen, P.Ch., Regularization tools: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems, Numer. Algorithms, 1994, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–35.10.1007/BF02149761 ↗
25. Hansen, P.Ch., Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion, Philadelphia: Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 1998.10.1137/1.9780898719697 ↗