Performance Evaluation of 42 mm Diameter Stranded Ungalvanised Haulage Rope in a Mono-Cable Passenger Ropeway
Source abstract
Abstract
Most common conventional method of rope condition evaluation is visual method i.e. watching the exterior strand and outer surface only. Core damage cannot be detected. To assess the rope condition, magnetic nondestructive method is the most suitable method. Periodic rope assessment is necessary to prevent rope failures and extension of rope life. Flaw detectors in the Magnetic Rope Tester detect LMA (loss in metallic area) and LF (localized faults) [1, 2]. This paper describes the performance of a haulage rope in two years.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (8)
Show source-provided references
1. Basak, D., Pal, S., and Patranabis, D.C., In situ nondestructive assessment of a haulage rope in a monocable zigback passenger ropeway, Insight, 2008, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 136–137.10.1784/insi.2008.50.3.136 ↗
2. Basak, D., Pal, S., and Patranabis, D.C., Nondestructive evaluation of haulage ropes in monocable aerial ropeways: A comparable study, Insight, 2007, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 660–664.10.1784/insi.2007.49.11.660 ↗
3. Basak, D., Studies of stranded and locked coil ropes using nondestructive testing techniques, Ph. D. Thesis, September 2008.
4. Intros Steel Wire Rope Flaw Detector. http://www.intron.ru.
5. CIMFR Project Reports on Nondestructive Investigation on Steel Wire Ropes, 2017-2018.
6. Geller, L.B., Leung, K., Udd, J.E., and Kitzinger, F., Electromagnetic testing of wire rope—New developments, CIM Bull., October 2003, pp. 65–71.
7. Basak, D., Pal, S., and Patranabis, D.C., Performance comparison of track ropes in contemporary ropeway installations, Insight, 2011, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 490-493.10.1784/insi.2011.53.9.490 ↗
8. Basak, D. and Das, B., Performance evaluation of track ropes using two nondestructive testing instruments, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Res. Dev.(IJMERD), 2013, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 5–11.