Selective Magnetic Testing of Thickness and Hardening Degree of Surface Layers on Steel Objects
Source abstract
Abstract
The dependences of locally measured magnetic characteristics of surface-hardened steel objects on the thickness and physical properties of their surface layers are investigated. It has been shown theoretically and experimentally that a change in the thickness of the hardened layer on the surface of steel objects has the greatest effect on the magnitude of the tangential field component on the object’s surface in the interpolar space, and the change in the strength properties of the layer affects the magnitude of the magnetic flux in the “transducer-object” circuit. It is proposed to use this difference in magnetic parameters for selective testing of the surface hardening quality. It is shown that the coercive force locally measured by the internal field and the maximum value of the magnetic flux that could be measured in one measuring cycle using a single transducer can be used as diagnostic parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems · Surface Treatment and Coatings
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Bunshah, R.F., Handbook of Hard Coating, Deposition Technologies, Properties and Applications, Bunshah, R.F., Ed., Norwich: Noyes Publ., 2001.
2. Surface Hardening of Steels, Understanding the Basics, Davis, J.R., Ed., Russel Township: ASM Int., 2002.
3. Stepanova, T.Yu., Tekhnologii poverkhnostnogo uprochneniya detalei mashin. uchebnoe posobie (Technology of Surface Hardening of Machine Parts. A Textbook), Ivanovo: Ivanovsk. Gos. Univ. Khim. Tekhnol., 2009.
4. Wagha Santoshkumar, V., Bhattb Dhananjay, V., Menghanic Jyoti, V., and Bhavikattid Shivnanda, S., Effects of laser hardening process parameters on hardness depth of Ck45 steel using Taguchi’s optimization technique, IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2020, vol. 810, article ID 012027. https://doi.org//10.1088/1757-899X/810/1/01202710.1088/1757-899X/810/1/012027 ↗
5. Baev, A.R., Mayorov, A.L., and Tishchenko, M.A., Ultrasonic method of analysis of surface hardening of metal products, Foundry Prod. Metall., 2010, no. 4, pp. 267–271.
6. Baqeri, R., Honarvar, F., and Mehdizad, R., Case depth profile measurement of hardened components using ultrasonic backscattering method, 18th World Conf. Nondestr. Test. (Durban, 2012).
7. Salchak, Y.A., Sednev, D.A., Kroening, M., and Ardashkin, I.B., Method of case hardening depth testing by using multifunctional ultrasonic testing instrument, Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, no. 81, pp. 1–8.10.1088/1757-899X/81/1/012080 ↗
8. Cuffe, J., Sun, H., Plotnikov, Y., Nath, Sh., and Sheila-Vadde, A., Eddy current measurement of case hardened depth of steel components, 17th World Conf. Nondestr. Test. (Shanghai, 2008).
9. Bida, G.V., Mikheev, M.N., and Kostin, V.N., Determination of the dimensions of an attached electromagnet intended for nondestructive testing of the depth and hardness of surface-hardened layers, Defektoskopiya, 1984, no. 8, pp. 10–16.
10. Mikheev, M.N., Bida, G.V., Kostin, V.N., and Mikhailova, A.A., Control of the depth and hardness of layers hardened from HFC heating on the crankshaft journals of a car, Defectoskopiya, 1985, no. 8, pp. 12–17.
11. Shcherbinin, V.E. and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnitnye metody strukturnogo analiza i nerazrushayushchego kontrolya (Magnetic Methods of Structural Analysis and Nondestructive Testing) Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci., 1996.
12. Bida, G.V. and Nichipuruk, A.P., Coercive force measurements in nondestructive testing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2000, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 707–727.10.1007/BF02759255 ↗
13. Lo, C.C.H., Kinser, E.R., and Jiles, D.C., Magnetic non-destructive characterization of case depth in surfacehardened steel components, AIP Conf. Proc., 2005, vol. 820, pp. 1253–1260.10.1063/1.2184668 ↗
14. Murikov, S.A., Artemiev, I.A., Murikov, E.S., Kudryashov, A.A., Urtsev, V.N., Nichipuruk, A.P., and Stashkov, A.N., Possibilities of coercimetry for diagnostics of the technical condition of the rolls of a hot rolling mill, Stal’, 2011, vol. 11, pp. 68–70.
15. Gorkunov, E.S., Lapidus, B.M., and Valtysheva, I.A., Stability of magnetic states of two-layer ferromagnets to the influence of constant and alternating magnetic fields, Defektoskopiya, 1986, no. 4, pp. 77–84.
16. Matyuk, V.F., Melguy, M.A., and Pinchukov, D.A., Method of quality control of the surface-hardened layer of products made of ferromagnetic materials, RF Patent No. 2006136959/28, Byull. Izobret., no. 21, 2008.
17. Gorkunov, E.S., Lapidus, B.M., Zagainov, A.V., Voronov, S.A., and Bushmeleva, G.Ya., The use of differential magnetic permeability for quality control of surface hardening, Defektoskopiya, 1988, no. 7, pp. 7–13.
18. Gorkunov, E.S., Makhov, V.N., Povolotskaya, A.M., Tuzankin, S.V., Subbotin, Yu.S., and Lapidus, B.M., Magnetic measuring complex for magnetostructural research, Defektoskopiya, 1999, no. 3, pp. 78–84.
19. Byzov, A.V., Ksenofontov, D.G., Kostin, V.N., and Vasilenko, O.N., Magnetic field distribution in steel objects with different properties of hardened layer, Adv. Comp. Des., 2022, no. 1.
20. Tumanski, S., Handbook of Magnetic Measurements, London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
21. https://cxem.net/software/finiteElementMethodMagnetics.php.
22. Kostin, V.N., Osintsev, A.A., Stashkov, A.N., Nichipuruk, A.P., Kostin, K.V., and Sazhina, E.Yu., Portable instruments for multiparameter magnetic evaluation of material structures, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 280–289.10.1134/S1061830908040086 ↗
23. Kostin, V.N., Vasilenko, O.N., and Byzov, A.V., DIUS-1.15M mobile hardware–software structuroscopy system, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, pp. 654–661.10.1134/S1061830918090048 ↗
24. Kostin, V.N., Vasilenko, O.N., Mikhailov, A.V., Lukinykh, N.P., and Ksenofontov, D.G., On the advantages of local measurement of coercive force of ferromagnetic objects based on internal field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, pp. 574–580.10.1134/S1061830920070050 ↗