Detecting Flaws in Pumping-Compressor Pipe Couplings by Magnetic, Eddy Current, and Ultrasonic Multiple-Shadow Testing Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
We present an analysis of detectability of flaws in the couplings of pumping-compressor pipes by various methods of nondestructive testing. The eddy current, magnetic particle, probe-coil magnetic field and ultrasonic testing methods were used. The excitation and reception of Rayleigh waves in the multiple-shadow method is provided by an electromagnetic-acoustic method to reduce the influence of acoustic contact quality on testing results. An indicator of the detectability of a flaw of this type is introduced. It is determined by the ratio of the value of an informative parameter measured on a sample with a defect and the value of a similar parameter characterizing a defect-free sample. The following informative parameters of the acoustic method are substantiated: “variance,” “multiple detection coefficient,” and the propagation velocity of Rayleigh waves. Unlike the eddy current, magnetic particle, and probe-coil magnetic field testing methods, the acoustic method provides testing of the entire coupling in a single installation of the transducer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Antipov, A.G. and Markov, A.A., Detectability of rail defects by magnetic flux leakage method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091904002810.1134/S1061830919040028 ↗
2. Markov A.A. and Maksimova, E.A., Analysis of the efficiency of ultrasonic and magnetic channels of flaw detection systems, Vestn. IzhGTU im. M.T. Kalashnikova, 2019, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 22–32. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2019-2-22-3210.22213/2413-1172-2019-2-22-32 ↗
3. Liu, S., Sun, Y., Jiang, X., and Kang, Y., Comparison and analysis of multiple signal processing methods in steel wire rope defect detection by hall sensor, Measurement, 2021, vol. 171, p. 108768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10876810.1016/j.measurement.2020.108768 ↗
4. Badalyan, V.G., Identification and reliability of control in ultrasonic flaw detection and defectometry, Kontrol’ Diagn., 2020, no. 7, pp. 4–17. https://doi.org/10.14489/td.2020.07.pp.004-01710.14489/td.2020.07.pp.004-017 ↗
5. Pavros, K.S., Sidorenko, I.G., and Rockstroh, B., Comparative Detectability of Planar Extended Defects of Sheet Metal by Reflection and Transmission Methods, Journal of the Russian Universities. Radioelectronics, 2019, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 75–83. https://doi.org/10.32603/1993-8985-2019-22-6-75-8310.32603/1993-8985-2019-22-6-75-83 ↗
6. Hu, B. and Yu, R., Magnetic testing for inter-granular crack defect of tubing coupling, Nondestruct. Test. Eval., 2018, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2017.134188210.1080/10589759.2017.1341882 ↗
7. Shleenkov, A.S., Bulychev, O.A., Shleenkov, S.A., and Novgorodov, D.V., Features and advantages of applying anisotropic magnetoresistive field sensors to testing the full volume of small- and medium-diameter pipes, Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092005008310.1134/S1061830920050083 ↗
8. Wang, S., Zhao, P., Qu, Zh., and Wang, K., A new system for defects inspection of boiler water wall tubes using a combination of EMAT and MFL, 2018 IEEE Far East NDT New Technol. Appl. Forum (FENDT), Xiamen, 2018, pp. 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/FENDT.2018.868196710.1109/FENDT.2018.8681967 ↗
9. Kryukov, A.S., Chegodaev, V.V., Zhdanov, A.G., and Lunin, V.P., A method for the determination of the volumes of arbitrarily-spaced local defects during eddy-current testing of cylindrical items by a multi-unit probe, Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091512005010.1134/S1061830915120050 ↗
10. Murav’eva, O.V., Murav’ev, V.V., Strizhak, V.A., Murashov, S.A., and Pryakhin, A.V., Akusticheskii volnovodnyi kontrol' lineino-protyazhennykh ob”ektov (Acoustic Waveguide Testing of Linearly Extended Objects), Novosibirsk: Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017.
11. Aleshin, N.P., Investigating the detectability of surface volumetric defects in ultrasonic testing with the use of Rayleigh waves generated by an electromagnetic-acoustic transducer, Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test., 2021, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092105002810.1134/S1061830921050028 ↗
12. Liu, X., Surface crack identification on a cylinder using the signal enhancement of the scanning laser line source method, Appl. Sci., 2018, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1796. https://doi.org/10.3390/app810179610.3390/app8101796 ↗
13. He, C., Deng, P., Lu, Y., Liu, X., Liu, Z., Jiao, J., and Wu, B., Estimation of surface crack depth using Rayleigh waves by electromagnetic acoustic transducers, Int. J. Acoust. Vib., 2017, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 541–548. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2017.22.450110.20855/ijav.2017.22.4501 ↗
14. Uglov, A.L., Khlybov, A.A., Bichkov, A.L., and Kuvshinov, M.O., About non-destructive control of residual stresses in axisymmetric parts made of steel 03Ni17Co10W10MoTi, Vestn. IzhGTU im. M.T. Kalashnikova, 2019, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2019-4-3-910.22213/2413-1172-2019-4-3-9 ↗
15. Cheng, L., Crack characterisation using invariable feature extraction in stainless steel specimen used for absorber tubes of CSP applications via EMAT, Renew. Energ., 2017, vol. 101, pp. 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.03610.1016/j.renene.2016.09.036 ↗
16. Kim, C., Evaluating rolling contact fatigue damage precursors with Rayleigh waves in 1060 steel, J. Nondestruct. Eval., 2021, vol. 40, no. 4, p. 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00828-z10.1007/s10921-021-00828-z ↗
17. Murav’ev, V.V., Budrin, A.Y., and Sintsov, M.A., Structuroscopy of Heat-Treated Steel Bars by the Speed of Propagation of Rayleigh Waves, Intellekt. Sist. Proizv., 2020, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 37–43. https://doi.org/10.22213/2410-9304-2020-2-37-4310.22213/2410-9304-2020-2-37-43 ↗
18. Murav’ev, V.V., Budrin, A.Y., and Sintsov, M.A., Influence of high-cycle fatigue on the speed of shear and Rayleigh waves in steel bars of different heat treatment, Intell. Sist. Proizv., 2020, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4–10. https://doi.org/10.22213/2410-9304-2020-4-1010.22213/2410-9304-2020-4-10 ↗
19. Volkova, L.V., Murav’eva, O.V., and Murav’ev, V.V., Nonuniformity of acoustic anisotropy of thick-sheet steel, Steel Transl., 2021, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 335–341. https://doi.org/10.3103/S096709122105012010.3103/S0967091221050120 ↗
20. Vakhguelt, A., Syswoio Jo, R., and Bergander, M.J., Electromagnetic acoustic boiler tubes inspection with robotic device, Vibroeng. Procedia, 2017, vol. 15, pp. 115–118. https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2017.1945310.21595/vp.2017.19453 ↗
21. Zhang, Z., Zhao, J., and Pan, Y., Surface circular-arc defects interacted by laser-generated Rayleigh wave, Ultrasonics, 2020, vol. 103, p. 106085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10608510.1016/j.ultras.2020.106085 ↗
22. Ahmad, M., Characterization of surface crack width in plates using Rayleigh wave electromagnetic acoustic transducers, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 1043, no. 4, p. 042038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1043/4/04203810.1088/1757-899X/1043/4/042038 ↗
23. Ducousso, M. and Reverdy, F., Real-time imaging of microcracks on metallic surface using total focusing method and plane wave imaging with Rayleigh waves, NDT & E Int., 2020, vol. 116, p. 102311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10231110.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102311 ↗
24. Trushkevych, O. and Edwards, R.S., Characterisation of small defects using miniaturised EMAT system, NDT & E Int., 2019, vol. 107, p.102140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10214010.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102140 ↗
25. Thring, C.B., The effect of EMAT coil geometry on the Rayleigh wave frequency behavior, Ultrasonics, 2019, vol. 99, p. 105945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2019.06.00710.1016/j.ultras.2019.06.007 ↗
26. Petrov, K.V., Sokov, M.Y., and Murav’eva, O.V., The effect of electromagnetic acoustic transducer design features on results of cylinder object testing, Vestn. IzhGTU im. M.T. Kalashnikova, 2018, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 135. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2018-2-135-14610.22213/2413-1172-2018-2-135-146 ↗
27. Strizhak, V.A., Hasanov, R.R., and Pryakhin, A.V., Features of excitation of an electromagnetic acoustic transducer under a waveguide method of testing, Vestn. IzhGTU im. M.T. Kalashnikova, 2018, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 159–166. https://doi.org/10.22213/2413-1172-2018-2-159-16610.22213/2413-1172-2018-2-159-166 ↗
28. Tu, J., An external through type RA-EMAT for steel pipe inspection, Sens. Actuators A: Phys., 2021, vol. 331, p. 113053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2021.11305310.1016/j.sna.2021.113053 ↗
29. Vakhguelt, A., Kapayeva, S.D., and Bergander, M.J., Combination non-destructive test (NDT) method for early damage detection and condition assessment of boiler tubes, Procedia Eng., 2017, vol. 188, pp. 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.46510.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.465 ↗
30. Murav’eva, O.V. and Zorin, V.A., The multiple shadow method applied to testing cylindrical objects with Rayleigh waves, Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091705005910.1134/S1061830917050059 ↗
31. Murav’eva, O.V., Volkova, L.V., Murav’ev, V.V., Sintsov, M.A., Mishkin, Yu.V., and Basharova, A.F., Sensitivity of electromagnetic-acoustic multiple shadow method using Rayleigh waves in inspection of oil country tubular goods, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183092012005010.1134/S1061830920120050 ↗
32. Strizhak, V.A., Pryakhin, A.V., Khasanov, R.R., and Efremov, A.B., Hardware-software complex for rods control by mirror-shadow method using multiple reflections, Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Priborostroenie, 2017, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 565–571. https://doi.org/10.17586/0021-3454-2017-60-6-565-57110.17586/0021-3454-2017-60-6-565-571 ↗
33. Viktorov, I.A., Zvukovye poverkhnostnie volni v tverdikh telakh (Sound Surface Waves in Solids), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.
34. Murav’eva, O.V., Murav’ev, V.V., Gabbasova, M.A., Buldakova, I.V., and Sokov, M.Yu., Analysis of reflected signals in testing cylindrical specimens by the multiple reflection echo-shadow method, Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing, 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 367–373. https://doi.org/10.3103/S875669901604008710.3103/S8756699016040087 ↗