Eddy Current Testing of Metallic Materials Using Projection Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Using the example of nonmagnetic metallic materials, the projection methods of multidimensional analysis of multifrequency eddy-current testing measurement data presented for processing are considered. Based on the principal components method, the effects of electrical conductivity and sensor–material-surface gap on the results of testing have been separated. Using regression on principal components, the numerical values of the electrical conductivity and gap for manganese, copper, bronze, aluminum, and an aluminum alloy have been obtained. The results make it possible to extend the possibilities of nondestructive eddy-current evaluation of materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Nerazrushayushchii kontrol’. Spravochnik. V 7 t (Nondestructive Testing. A Handbook. 7 vols.) Klyuev, V.V., Ed., Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2003.
2. Garcia-Martin, J., Gomez-Gil, J., and Vazquez-Sanchez, E., Non-destructive techniques based on eddy current testing, Sensors (Basel), 2011, vol. 11(3), pp. 2525–2565.10.3390/s110302525 ↗
3. Yang, H.C. and Tai, C.C., Pulsed eddy-current measurement of a conducting coating on a magnetic metal plate, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2002, vol. 13, pp. 1259–126510.1088/0957-0233/13/8/313 ↗
4. Egorov, A.V., Polyakov, V.V., Salita, D.S., et al., Inspection of aluminum alloys by a multi-frequency eddy current method, Defence Technol., 2015, vol. 11, pp. 99–10310.1016/j.dt.2014.12.002 ↗
5. Bakunov, A.S., Muzhitskii, V.F., and Shubochkin, S.E., A modern solution to problems of eddy-current structuroscopy, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2004, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 346–34910.1023/B:RUNT.0000045939.27103.30 ↗
6. Yakimov, E.V., Urazbekov, E.I., Gol’dshtein, A.E., and Bulgakov, V.F., Computational transformation of signals of a measuring information system for eddy-current flaw detection, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2013, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 657–66310.1134/S1061830913110107 ↗
7. Dyakin, V.V. and Sandovskii, V.A., Teoriya i raschet nakladnykh vikhretokovykh preobrazovatelei (Theory and Calculation of Attachable Eddy-Current Transducers), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.
8. Esbensen, K., Analiz mnogomernykh dannykh. Izbrannye glavy (Analysis of Multidimensional Data. Selected Chapters), Kucheryavskii, S.V., Transl., Chernogolovka: Inst. Probl. Chem. Phys., Russ. Acad. Sci., 2005.
9. Egorov, A.V. and Polyakov, V.V., The application of principal-component analysis during eddy-current testing of aluminum alloys, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 633–63810.1134/S1061830915100034 ↗
10. Shokralla, S., Morelli, J.E., and Krause, T.W., Principal components analysis of multifrequency eddy current data used to measure pressure tube to calandria tube gap, IEEE Sensors J., 2016, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 3147–315410.1109/JSEN.2016.2529721 ↗
11. Zalmanzon, L.A., Preobrazovaniya Fur’e, Uolsha, Khaara i ikh primenenie v upravlenii, svyazi i drugikh oblastyakh (Fourier, Walsh, and Haar Transforms and Their Applications in Control, Communication, and Other Fields), Moscow: Nauka, 1989.
12. Egorov, A.V., Kucheryavskiy, S.V., and Polyakov, V.V., Resolution of effects in multi-frequency eddy current data for reliable diagnostics of conductive materials, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 2017, vol. 160, pp. 8–1210.1016/j.chemolab.2016.11.007 ↗