Imaging Electric Signals of a Magnetic Field Transducer with Hysteretic Interference for Testing Metals in Pulsed Magnetic Fields
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the developed methods of hysteretic interference, we produced the calculated dependences $$U\left( x \right)$$ of the electric voltage across a magnetic field transducer on the x-coordinate. A magnetic carrier with an arctangent characteristic was exposed to a series of one, two, three, four, five, and fifteen bipolar pulses of linear-inductor magnetic field. An algorithm is presented for the sequence of changes in the total intensity of the magnetic field pulses on the aluminum plate surface that ensures the same amplitude of hysteretic electric-voltage oscillations and allows one to obtain a linear difference dependence $$U\left( x \right)$$ for wedge-shaped and flat aluminum samples. The results obtained make it possible to improve the accuracy and efficiency of object thickness gaging and testing for thickness variation in the given directions, as well as for defects in the object.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Astakhov, V.I., Danilina, E.M., and Ershov, Yu.K., On the question of inspecting the plate with a crack by the eddy-current method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 182–191.10.1134/S1061830918030038 ↗
2. Shubochkin, A.E. and Efimov, A.G., Modern trends in the development of eddy current flaw detection and defect characterization, Kontrol’. Diagn., 2014, no. 3, pp. 68–73.10.14489/td.2014.03.pp.068-072 ↗
3. Foerster, F., Nondestructive testing by the method of stray magnetic fields. Theoretical and experimental foundations for detecting surface defects of finite and infinite depth, Defektoskopiya, 1984, no. 12, pp. 13–18.
4. Kiselev, E.K. and Gol’dshtein, A.E., Eddy-current system for testing inner diameter of pipes, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 210–216.10.1134/S1061830919030069 ↗
5. Sannikov, M.A., Influence of the curvature of the pipeline surface during diagnostics with eddy current devices, Kontrol’. Diagn., 2006, no. 9, pp. 24–27.
6. Sukhanov, D.Y. and Sovpel’, E.S., A magnetic-induction introscope for flaw detection of metal objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 308–314.10.1134/S1061830915050095 ↗
7. Sukhanov, D.Ya. and Sovpel’, E.S., Magnetic induction tomography of Electrical circuits and devices, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., 2015, vol. 58, no. 10/3, pp. 73—75.
8. Lukhvich, A.A., Luk’yanov, A.L., Shukevich, A.K., Shukevich, Ya.I., Polyakova, M.N., and Mosyakin, V.V., Coating-thickness measurements on parts with complex shapes, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2013, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 374–381.10.1134/S1061830913070048 ↗
9. Lukhvich, A.A., Bulatov, O.V., and Luk’yanov, A.L., Testing thick nickel coatings applied on two-layer (nonferromagnet-ferromagnet) bases by magnetodynamic thickness gauges, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2014, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 187–194.10.1134/S1061830914040044 ↗
10. Lukhvich, A.A., Bulatov, O.V., Luk’yanov, A.L., Polyakova, M.N., and Mosyakin, V.V., Magnetodynamic testing of the thickness of nickel coatings applied under chromium coatings on two-layer (nonferromagnet–ferromagnet) bases, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–7.10.1134/S1061830915010040 ↗
11. Kozlov, V.S., Tekhnika magnitograficheskoi defektoskopii (Magnetographic Nondestructive Testing Technique), Minsk: Vysheishaya Shkola, 1976.
12. Gruzintsev, A.A. and Mikhailov, S.P., Self-consisted calculation of the magnetic field for problems of magnetic flaw detection. I. Initial model for calculating the field of a magnetic tape magnetized from a wire with a current, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2011, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 104–111.10.1134/S1061830911020070 ↗
13. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Nondestructive control of objects made of electroconductive materials in pulsed magnetic fields, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 810–818.10.1134/S1061830910110045 ↗
14. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Calculating distributions of pulsed magnetic fields under hysteretic interference, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 121–127.10.1134/S1061830918020055 ↗
15. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Hysteretic interference of time-overlapping magnetic field pulses, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 949–956.10.1134/S1061830919120088 ↗
16. Pavlyuchenko, V.V. and Doroshevich, E.S., Hysteretic interference of magnetic field of a moving linear inductor, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2020, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 49–57.10.1134/S1061830920010106 ↗