journal article·2025-12

Direct Problem of Magnetostatics for a Uniformly Magnetized Cylinder

V. V. Dyakin, O. V. Kudryashova, V. Y. Raevskii

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Formulas for calculating the strength of the reaction field inside and outside a uniformly magnetized magnet in the form of a cylinder of finite dimensions are obtained. A Fortran program has been written that implements the methodology proposed on the basis of these formulas. The possibilities of applying this method to solve the geometric inverse problem of magnetostatics for magnetics or for through and internal cavities of the corresponding shape are discussed. The obtained formulas have been tested for their compliance with physical laws, as well as with known formulas for both specific cases of the considered configuration and the limit cases of the studied geometric shape of the magnet.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Pechenkov, A.N. and Shcherbinin, V.E., Nekotorye pryamye i obratnye zadachi tekhnicheskoi magnetostatiki (Some Direct and Inverse Problems of Technical Magnetostatics), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004.
2. Pechenkov, A.N. and Shcherbinin, V.E., On the solution of the inverse problem of magnetostatic tomography, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 176–190.10.1134/S106183090903005X ↗
3. Pechenkov, A.N. and Shcherbinin, V.E., On the issue of nonuniqueness of the solution to the inverse problem of magnetostatic flaw detection, Kontrol’ Diagn., 2006, no. 9, pp. 59–60.
4. Pechenkov, A.N., On the influence of body shape on the uniqueness of the solution to the inverse problem of magnetostatic flaw detection, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 653–655.10.1134/S1061830906100032 ↗
5. Dyakin, V.V., Direct and inverse problem of magnetostatics, Defektoskopiya, 1996, no. 3, pp. 3–6.
6. Dyakin, V.V., Kudryashova, O.V., and Raevskii, V.Ya., On the correctness of the direct and inverse problem of magnetostatics. Part 2, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 553–565.
7. Reutov, Yu.Ya., Gobov, Yu.L., and Loskutov, V.E., On the possibilities of using the ELCUT program in flaw detection calculations, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2002, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 425–430.10.1023/A:1022174825844 ↗
8. Zagidulin, R.V., Dyakin, V.V., Dudarev, M.S., and Shcherbinin, V.E., On determining the geometric dimensions of a surface defect, Fizicheskie metody i pribory NK. Tezisy dokladov X Ural’skoi nauchnoi tekhnicheskoi konferentsii (Physical methods and instruments for nondestructive testing: Proc. the X Ural Scientific and Technical Conference), Izhevsk, 1989.
9. Novoslugina, A.P. and Smorodinskii, Ya.G., A calculated method for estimating defect parameters in steels, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 765–771.10.1134/S1061830917110067 ↗
10. Dyakin, V.V., Raevskii, V.Ya., and Kudryashova, O.V., Field of a finite defect in a plate, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 199–209.10.1134/S1061830909030073 ↗
11. Krotov, L.N., Reconstruction of the interface boundary from the spatial distribution of the magnetic leakage field. 1. Investigation of the properties of the solution to the auxiliary direct problem, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2004, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 130–134.10.1023/B:RUNT.0000036557.88751.ea ↗
12. Krotov, L.N., Reconstruction of the interface boundary from the spatial distribution of the magnetic leakage field. 2. Formulation and method for solving the inverse geometric problem of magnetostatics, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2004, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 391–396.10.1023/B:RUNT.0000049847.80134.a8 ↗
13. Slesarev, D.A., Barat, V.A., and Chobanu, P.M., Reducing the error of the statistical method for estimating defect parameters in magnetic flaw detection, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 55–58.10.1134/S1061830912010111 ↗
14. Akhiezer, A.I., Obshchaya fizika. Elektricheskie i magnitnye yavleniya (General Physics: Electrical and Magnetic Phenomena), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1981.
15. Pechenkov, A.N. and Shcherbinin, V.E., Method for creating uniform magnetization and determining magnetic susceptibility, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2002, no. 7, pp. 47–50.10.1023/A:1022106405371 ↗
16. Samokhin, A.B., Ob”emnye singulyarnye integral’nye uravneniya elektrodinamiki (Volumetric Singular Integral Equations of Electrodynamics), Moscow: Tekhnosfera, 2021.
17. Khizhnyak, N.A., Integral’nye uravneniya makroskopicheskoi elektrodinamiki (Integral Equations of Macroscopic Electrodynamics), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1986.
18. Friedman, M.J., Mathematical study of the nonlinear singular integral magnetic field equation. 1, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 1980, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 14–20.10.1137/0139003 ↗
19. Friedman, M.J., Mathematical study of the nonlinear singular integral magnetic field equation. 2, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 1981, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 644–653.10.1137/0718042 ↗
20. Friedman, M.J., Mathematical study of the nonlinear singular integral magnetic field equation. 3, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 1981, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 536–540.10.1137/0512046 ↗
21. Dyakin, V.V., Matematicheskie osnovy klassicheskoi magnetostatiki (Mathematical Foundations of Classical Magnetostatics), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016.
22. Raevskii, V.Ya., On the properties of quasi-Hermitian operators and their application to the study of potential theory operators and the basic equation of electro- and magnetostatics, Preprint of the Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 2001, no. 24/48(01).
23. Raevskii, V.Ya., Some properties of the operators of potential theory and their application to the investigation of the basic equation of electrostatics and magnetostatics, Theor. Math. Phys., 1994, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1040–1045.10.1007/BF01018568 ↗
24. Fikhtengol’ts, G.M., Kurs differentsial’nogo i integral’nogo ischisleniya (Course of Differential and Integral Calculus), Moscow: Nauka, 1966, vol. 3.
25. Prudnikov, A.P., Brychkov, Yu.A., and Marichev, O.I., Integraly i ryady (Integrals and Series. Vol. 1), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2003, vol. 1.
26. Bronshtein, I.N. and Semendyaev, K.A., Spravochnik po matematike dlya inzhenerov i uchashchikhsya VTUZov (Mathematics Handbook for Engineers and Students of Technical Universities), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.
27. Zegrya, G.G., Veksler, M.I., Smirnova, I.G., and Ustinova, I.A., Raschet statsionarnykh elektricheskikh i magnitnykh polei (Calculation of Stationary Electric and Magnetic Fields), St. Petersburg: Univ. ITMO, 2019.
28. Antonov, L.I., Dedenko, L.G., and Matveev, A.N., Metodika resheniya zadach po elektrichestvu (Methodology for Solving Electricity Problems), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1982.
29. Dyakin, V.V., Kudryashova, O.V., and Raevskii, V.Ya., Calculating the magnetic field strength inside and outside of an infinite cylinder placed in an arbitrary external field, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 293–305.10.1134/S1061830924601703 ↗