Design of Stable Hollow Particles for Silicon Anodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicon electrodes hold a promise of increasing the capacity of lithium-ion batteries ten-fold. Yet, their commercial deployment is hampered by large volume changes of silicon particles in response to lithium insertion and extraction. Optimal design of porous silicon structures, aimed at ameliorating this drawback, requires experimentation guided by mathematical models of the chemomechanical behavior of silicon-anode particles and their agglomerations. We present such a model that describes the temporal evolution of a hollow or solid particle’s volume and concomitant stresses, for both galvanostatic and potentiostatic operating conditions. This model is used to optimize design parameters─particle size, particle thickness, and charging profiles─for energy density, while maintaining stable elastic operation. It accurately predicts the experimentally observed value of the partial molar volume of lithium in silicon. Our model also furnishes fundamental insights into chemomechanical interactions in multiparticle electrode systems, which are crucial for advancement of the silicon-electrode technology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Stanford University
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.est.2019.10104710.1016/j.est.2019.101047 ↗
2. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mseb.2016.04.01610.1016/j.mseb.2016.04.016 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20130179510.1002/adma.201301795 ↗
5. 10.1149/1.240211210.1149/1.2402112 ↗
6. 10.1002/celc.20150025410.1002/celc.201500254 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2007.41110.1038/nnano.2007.411 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl201470j10.1021/nl201470j ↗
9. 10.1007/s40820-024-01388-310.1007/s40820-024-01388-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17587310.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175873 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10800-024-02154-410.1007/s10800-024-02154-4 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.172825610.1063/1.1728256 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.11710.1016/j.msea.2005.05.117 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.011 ↗
15. 10.1524/zpch.1966.49.3_5.27110.1524/zpch.1966.49.3_5.271 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0266180810.1007/BF02661808 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10008-006-0095-110.1007/s10008-006-0095-1 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.275984010.1149/1.2759840 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.345870710.1063/1.3458707 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00466-014-1102-510.1007/s00466-014-1102-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.08210.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.082 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.222159710.1149/1.2221597 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.04310.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.043 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.04.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.04.028 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.348937810.1149/1.3489378 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.01510.1016/j.ssi.2008.12.015 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12812210.1016/j.cej.2020.128122 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.011 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0000210.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00002 ↗