journal article·2025-02Open access

Preload Detection System Based on Ultrasonic Energy Transmission for Attached Joint Structures

Guanbing Ma, Qi Wang, Maocheng Hong, Ruding Xia, Yue Zhao, Ming Li, Tao Song, Jun Zhang

Abstract

Abstract In the aerospace industry and nuclear power plants, bolt preload is a crucial metric for assessing the quality of installation and the state of service of the flange connection parts of pressure vessels. The primary technique for determining the preload force is the ultrasonic stress measurement method based on pulse time-of-flight. However, the current ultrasonic preload measuring approach is no longer applicable for unique bolted structures like pointed bolts and high acoustic attenuation bolts, as it is unable to receive the bolt end face echo. This work aims to address this issue by proposing a detection system based on interlayer ultrasonic energy transfer-based bolt preload measurement method. The ultrasonic energy transmission model of the sandwich’s rough interface is built using both classical contact theory and ultrasonic propagation theory. When paired with a finite element simulation, this model shows a linear relationship between the sandwich’s ultrasonic transmission signal energy and the bolt preload force. The relationship between the ultrasonic transmission energy and the bolt preload force under the ultrasonic frequency contact surface roughness and other factors was systematically investigated. A testing platform was set up to conduct the ultrasonic energy transmission test on the preload force of the bolt interlayer. According to the test results, there is a good linear relationship between the ultrasonic transmission signal energy and bolt preload obtained under various groups of parameters, R 2 is greater than 0.97, and the bolt preload measurement error range for flange bolts is between –5.4% and 5.6%. These findings suggest that the method presented in this paper has a promising future.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Engineering Applied Research · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Gao, X. and Wang, W., Bolt load looseness measurement for slip-critical blind bolt by ultrasonic technique: A feasibility study with calibration and experimental verification, Struct. Health Monit., 2024, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921723117387310.1177/14759217231173873 ↗
2. Miao, R.S., Shen, R.L., Zhang, S.H., and Xue, S.L., A review of bolt tightening force measurement and loosening detection, Sensors, 2020, vol. 20, no. 11, Art. no. 3165. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2011316510.3390/s20113165 ↗
3. Krot, P., Shiri, H., Dabek, P., and Zimroz, R., Diagnostics of bolted joints in vibrating screens based on a multi-body dynamical model, Materials, 2023, vol. 16, no. 17, p. 5794. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1617579410.3390/ma16175794 ↗
4. Zhang, L., Huang, Z.M., Bai, L., Ma, Z.G., and Zhang, L., Study on the relationship between bolt anchoring defects and complexity of nondestructive testing signal, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2021, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 987–999. https://doi.org/10.1134/s106183092111012710.1134/s1061830921110127 ↗
5. Zhou, Y., Yuan, C., Sun, X.Y., Yang, Y.Q., Wang, C., and Li, D.L., Monitoring the looseness of a bolt through laser ultrasonic, Smart Mater. Struct., 2020, vol. 29, no. 11, p. 115022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ababe110.1088/1361-665X/ababe1 ↗
6. He, Z.F., Huang, X.H., Xu, Z.D., Shi, Q.X., Guo, Y.Q., and Kim, J., Experimental study on seismic performance of prefabricated viscoelastic damping bolted joints, Eng. Struct., 2022, vol. 256, p. 113933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11393310.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113933 ↗
7. Xie, J.S. et al., Simulation and experimental study on contact pressure distribution of contact interface in single and double bolted connection structures, J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Act. Control, 2024, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348423120930010.1177/14613484231209300 ↗
8. Chen, J.Z., He, R.Y., Kang, X.W., and Yang, X.Y., Simulation and experiment for the inspection of stainless steel bolts in servicing using an ultrasonic phased array, Nondestr. Test. Eval., 2015, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2015.104645310.1080/10589759.2015.1046453 ↗
9. Fu, R.L., Mao, R.W., Yuan, B., Chen, D.D., and Huo, L.S., Multi-resolution bolt preload monitoring based on the acoustoelastic effect of ultrasonic guided waves, Smart. Struct. Syst., 2022, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 513–520. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2022.30.5.51310.12989/sss.2022.30.5.513 ↗
10. Marshall, M.B., Lewis, R., Howard, T., and Brunskill, H., Ultrasonic measurement of self-loosening in bolted joints, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C-J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 2012, vol. 226, no. C7, pp. 1869–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621142975810.1177/0954406211429758 ↗
11. Montoya, A., Doyle, D., Maji, A., and Dumm, H.P., Ultrasonic evaluation of bolted connections in satellites, Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2014, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2013.82463210.1080/09349847.2013.824632 ↗
12. Markov, A.A. and Maximova, E.A., Analyzing ultrasonic signal parameters during high-speed rail inspection, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2021, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1134/s106183092103003710.1134/s1061830921030037 ↗
13. Sun, Q.C., Yuan, B., Mu, X.K., and Sun, W., Bolt preload measurement based on the acoustoelastic effect using smart piezoelectric bolt, Smart Mater. Struct., 2019, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 055005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab06dc10.1088/1361-665X/ab06dc ↗
14. Ding, X., Wu, X.J., and Wang, Y.G., Bolt axial stress measurement based on a mode-converted ultrasound method using an electromagnetic acoustic transducer, Ultrasonics, 2014, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 914–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2013.11.00310.1016/j.ultras.2013.11.003 ↗
15. Li, X., Wang, S.J., Li, Z.P., Yang, R.J., and Li, Z.C., Measurement of bolt axial stress using a combination of trailing wave and shear wave ultrasound, NDT & E Int., 2024, vol. 143, p. 103056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10305610.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103056 ↗
16. Liu, Y.M., Liu, E.X., Chen, Y.L., Wang, X.M., Sun, C.Z., and Tan, J.B., Measurement of fastening force using dry-coupled ultrasonic waves, Ultrasonics, 2020, vol. 108, p. 106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10617810.1016/j.ultras.2020.106178 ↗
17. Jing, X.C., Dai, H.W., Xu, W.L., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., and Yang, B., Axial load measurement of bolts with different clamping lengths based on high-frequency ultrasonic ZnO film sensor, Sensors, 2023, vol. 23, no. 7, p. 3712. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2307371210.3390/s23073712 ↗
18. Zhao, X.X., Li, Y.M., Liu, X.G., and Yao, K., Ultrasonic measurement on axial force of high-strength bolt in service, J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Act. Control, 2020, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/146134841881540510.1177/1461348418815405 ↗
19. Lee, E.S., Choi, S.W., and Kang, L.H., Estimation of the ultrasonic time-of-flight for evaluating the axial force acting on bolt/nut assemblies under various mechanical and thermal conditions, Struct. Health Monit., 2023, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2481–2495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921722112468710.1177/14759217221124687 ↗
20. Hu, Y.L., Chen, P., Peng, X.M., Yin, A.J., and Yu, X., Measurement of axial stress in high-strength short bolts using ultrasonic attenuation, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2023, vol. 34, no. 8, p. 085013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/acd39f10.1088/1361-6501/acd39f ↗
21. Liu, S. et al., Ultrasonic measurement of axial preload in high-frequency nickel-based superalloy smart bolt, Sensors, 2023, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2301022010.3390/s23010220 ↗
22. Pan, Q.X., Pan, R.P., Shao, C., Chang, M.L., and Xu, X.Y., Research review of principles and methods for ultrasonic measurement of axial stress in bolts, Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 2020, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033-020-0431-x10.1186/s10033-020-0431-x ↗
23. Greenwood, J.A. and Williamson, J.B., Contact of nominally flat surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A-Math. Phys. Sci., 1966, vol. 295, no. 1442, pp. 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1966.024210.1098/rspa.1966.0242 ↗
24. Parvasi, S.M., Ho, S.C.M., Kong, Q.Z., Mousavi, R., and Song, G.B., Real time bolt preload monitoring using piezoceramic transducers and time reversal technique-a numerical study with experimental verification, Smart Mater. Struct., 2016, vol. 25, no. 8, p. 085015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08501510.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085015 ↗