A Nondestructive Testing Method of Incremental Permeability Based on Permanent Magnet Movement Magnetization
Source abstract
Abstract
Typical Incremental permeability (IP) requires a high power supply to generate a bias magnetic field that periodically magnetizes the testing samples, making it difficult to apply to occasions where high power supply is short. To solve this problem, this paper presents a low power NDT method based on IP, which is characterized in that the permanent magnets are used to form a bias magnetic field, and the sample is magnetized aperiodically by moving the permanent magnet in one direction. Finite element simulation is used to compare the magnetic fields formed by permanent magnets with different number of blocks and distance between them, as well as the hysteresis curves under magnetic excitation, and a finite element simulation method (FEM) of IP is given. Our experiments used the new method to estimate the yield strength of steels, demonstrating that the proposed method can obtain an approximately accurate result, and its power consumption is less than 2 W.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim, C.S., Characterization of reversible permeability in advanced USC steel during thermal aging, Phys. Status Solidi A, 2010, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 97–100.10.1002/pssa.200925071 ↗
2. Ryu, K.S. et al., A new nondestructive method for estimating the remanent life of a turbine rotor steel by reversible magnetic permeability, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2002, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 196–201.10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00574-7 ↗
3. Szielasko et al., Minimalistic devices and sensors for micromagnetic materials characterization, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2013, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 101–104.10.1109/TMAG.2012.2217943 ↗
4. Chen, H. Numerical simulation of magnetic incremental permeability for ferromagnetic material, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., 2014, vol. 45, pp. 379–386.10.3233/JAE-141854 ↗
5. Matsumoto, T., Evaluation of chill structure in ductile cast iron by incremental permeability method, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., 2016, vol. 52, pp. 1599–1605.10.3233/JAE-162106 ↗
6. Dobmann, G., Kern, R., Altpeter I., et al., Quantitative hardening depth measurements up to 4 mm by means of micro magnetic microstructure multiparameter analysis (3MA), NDT & E Int., 1991, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 44.10.1016/0963-8695(91)90742-L ↗
7. Matsumoto, T., Uchimoto, T., Takagi, T., et al., Investigation of electromagnetic nondestructive evaluation of residual strain in low carbon steels using the eddy current magnetic signature (EC MS) method, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2019, vol. 479, pp. 212–221.10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.01.103 ↗
8. Cullity, B.D., Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1978.
9. Ebine, N. and Suzuki, M., Nondestructive measurement to evaluate changes of material properties of ferromagnetic structural steels with planar coils, in Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation (V), Pávó, J., Ed., Lansdale, PA: IOS Press, 2001, pp. 283–290.
10. Ryu, K.S., Nahm, S.H., Park, J.S., Yu, K.M., Kim, Y.B ., and Son, D., A new nondestructive method for estimating the remanent life of a turbine rotor steel by reversible magnetic permeability, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2002, vol. 251, no. 2, pp. 196–221.10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00574-7 ↗
11. Perevertov, O., Neslušan, M., and Stupakov, A., Detection of milled 100Cr6 steel surface by eddy current and incremental permeance methods, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 87, pp. 15–23.10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.12.008 ↗
12. Bong, Chung jong, et al., Nondestructive evaluation for remanent life of modified 9Cr1Mo steel by reversible magnetic permeability, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2011, vol. 323, no. 5, pp. 379–382.10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.10.015 ↗
13. Dobmann, G., Physical basics and industrial applications of 3MA micromagnetic multiparameter microstructure and stress analysis, Proc. ECNDT (2010), pp. 1–6.
14. Nichipuruk, A.P. et al., A procedure and device for calibration–free determination of residual compression stresses in low–carbon steels deformed by tension, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 772–778.10.1134/S1061830917110055 ↗
15. Stashkov, A.N. et al., Magnetic incremental permeability as indicator of compression stress in low-carbon steel, NDT & E Int., 2021, vol. 118, p. 102398.10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102398 ↗
16. Gupta, B., Ducharne, B., Sebald, G., Uchimoto, T., Miyazaki, T., and Takagi, T., Physical interpretation of the microstructure for aged 12 Cr–Mo–V–W steel creep test samples based on simulation of magnetic incremental permeability, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2019, vol. 486, p. 165250.10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165250 ↗
17. Gupta, B., Uchimoto, T., Ducharne, B., Sebald, G., Miyazaki, T., and Takagi, T., Magnetic incremental permeability non-destructive evaluation of 12 Cr–Mo–W–V steel creep test samples with varied ageing levels and thermal treatments, NDT & E Int., 2019, vol. 104, pp. 42–50.10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.03.006 ↗
18. Massimiliano, A., Minucci, S., Petrarca, C., Rubinacci, G., Tamburrino, A., and Ventre, S., Micromagnetic measurements of ferromagnetic materials: validation of a 3D numerical model, NDT & E Int., 2019, vol. 104, pp. 77–89.10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.04.001 ↗
19. Gabi, Y., Wolter, B., Gerbershagen, A., Martins, O., Ewen, M., and Braun, P., FEM simulations of incremental permeability signals of a multi-layer steel with consideration of the hysteretic behavior of each layer, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2013, vol. 50, pp. 1–4.10.1109/TMAG.2013.2285936 ↗
20. Gabi, Y., Jacob, K., Wolter, B., Conrad, C., Strass, B., and Grimm, J., Analysis of incremental and differential permeability in NDT via 3D-simulation and experiment, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2020, vol. 505, p. 166695.10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166695 ↗
21. Kaiyu Li, Lei Li, Ping Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Yu Shi, Yang Zhen, and Shiyun Dong, A fast and non-destructive method to evaluate yield strength of cold-rolled steel via incremental permeability, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2020, vol. 498, p. 166087.10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166087 ↗
22. Peterka, P., Kresák, J., Kropuch, S., et al., Non-destructive testing of steel wire rope transmission area to rope end by magnetic flux leakage, Appl. Mech. & Mater., 2014, vol. 683, pp. 39–44.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.683.39 ↗
23. Li Kaiyu, Qiu Peng Cheng, Wang Pin, et al., Estimation method of yield strength of ferromagnetic materials based on pulsed eddy current testing, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2021, vol. 523, p. 167647.10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167647 ↗
24. Song Ding, Guiyun Tian, and Ruslee Sutthaweekul, Non-destructive hardness prediction for 18CrNiMo7–6 steel based on feature selection and fusion of magnetic Barkhausen noise, NDT & E Int., 2019, vol. 107, p. 102138.10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102138 ↗
25. Jiles, D.C. and Thoelke, J.B., Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis: determination of model parameters from experimental hysteresis loops, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1989, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 3928–3930.10.1109/20.42480 ↗
26. Yashan, A., Measurements and semi-analytical modeling of incremental permeability using eddy current coil in the presence of magnetic hysteresis, in Electromagnetic Nondestructive Evaluation (VI), Kojima, F., Takagi, T., Udpa, S.S., and Pávó, J., Eds., Lansdale, PA: IOS press, 2002, pp. 150–157.