Simulation Modeling in Digital Radiography with Allowance for Spatial Outlines of Test Objects
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract—Algorithms are proposed for modeling the spatial outlines of test objects and forming their images in digital radiography systems. The algorithms provide the basis for simulation models of the systems being analyzed. The simulation models are designed to substantiate the technical feasibility of monitoring objects and selecting the parameters and evaluating the characteristics of digital radiography systems. To illustrate the capabilities of the developed simulation models, the digital radiographic images of some objects have been produced, including those of reference samples of sensitivity, spatial resolution, resolving ability, and penetrating power.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Engineering Technology and Methodologies · Ergonomics and Human Factors · Industrial Engineering and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Seeram, E., Digital Radiography: An Overview, in Digital Radiography, Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3244-9_110.1007/978-981-13-3244-9_1 ↗
2. Yahaghi, E., Movafeghi, A., Rokrok, B., and Mirzapour, M., Defects detection of digital radiographic images of aircraft structure materials via geometric locally adaptive sharpening, Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2020, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2019.163422610.1080/09349847.2019.1634226 ↗
3. Mery, D., Computer vision technology for X-ray testing, Insight (Northampton, U.K.), 2014, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2014.56.3.14710.1784/insi.2014.56.3.147 ↗
4. Khorshidi, A., Khosrowpour, B., and Hosseini, S.H., Determination of defect depth in industrial radiography imaging using MCNP code and SuperMC software, Nucl. Eng. Technol., 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.12.01010.1016/j.net.2019.12.010 ↗
5. Siryabe, E., Juliac, E., Barthe, A., and Ferdinand, C., X-ray digital detector array radiology to infer sagging depths in welded assemblies, NDT & E Int., 2020, vol. 111, article no. 102238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10223810.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102238 ↗
6. Du, W., Shen, H., Fu, J., Zhang, G., and He, Q., Approaches for improvement of the X-ray image defect detection of automobile casting aluminum parts based on deep learning, NDT & E Int., 2019, vol. 107, article no.102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10214410.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102144 ↗
7. Ewert, U., Zscherpel, U., and Jechow, M., Essential parameters and conditions for optimum image quality in digital radiology, in 18th World Conf.Nondestr. Test., Durban, South Africa, 2012, pp. 16–20. http://www.ndt.net/ article/wcndt2012/papers/595_wcndtfinal00594.pdf.
8. Osipov, S.P., Zhang, G.L., Chakhlov, S.V., Shtein, M.M., Shtein, A.M., Trinh, V.B., and Sirotyan, E., Estimation of parameters of digital radiography systems, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 2018, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 2732–2742.10.1109/TNS.2018.2870162 ↗
9. Yaffe, M.J. and Rowlands, J.A., X-ray detectors for digital radiography, Phys. Med. Biol., 1997, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/1/00110.1088/0031-9155/42/1/001 ↗
10. Silvan, A.S.S., Oliveira, D.F., Gomes, C.S., Azeredo, S.R., and Lopes, R.T., Evaluation of digital detector arrays systems for industrial radiography, Braz. J. Radiat. Sci., 2019, vol. 7, no. 2A. https://doi.org/10.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.60110.15392/bjrs.v7i2A.601 ↗
11. Oh, K., Kim, J., Kim, S., Chae, M., Lee, D., Cha, H., Lee, B., Evaluation and optimization of an image acquisition system for dual-energy cargo inspections, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 2018, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 2657–2661.10.1109/TNS.2018.2864787 ↗
12. Raad, J.A. and Kuiper, A., Industrial Radiography Image Forming Techniques, General Electric Co., Inspection Technologies, 2007. http://www.geinspectiontechnologies.com/en.
13. Deyhle, H., Towsyfyan, H., Biguri, A., Mavrogordato, M., Boardman, R., and Blumensath, T., Spatial resolution of a laboratory based X-Ray cone-beam laminography scanning system for various trajectories, NDT & E Int., 2020, vol. 111, article no. 102222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10222210.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102222 ↗
14. ANSI N42.46. American national standard for determination of the imaging performance of X-ray and gamma-ray systems for cargo and vehicle security screening, 2008.
15. Khan, M., Brothers, M., and Gillis, T., Computed radiography for high resolution imaging applications of aircraft structures, in 11th Int. Symp. NDT Aerosp., Paris-Saclay, France, 2019. https://www.ndt.net/article/ a-ero2019/papers/fp_thu2c1_m_khan.pdf.
16. Haith, M.I., Ewert, U., Hohendorf, S., Bellon, C., Deresch, A., Huthwaite, P., Lowe, M.J.S., and Zscherpel, U., Radiographic modelling for NDE of subsea pipelines, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 86, pp. 113—122.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.11.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2016.11.006 ↗
17. Keller, W.J. and Pessiki, S., Enhancing radiographic imaging of cementitious materials in composite structures with photon attenuating inclusions, Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2019, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2018.147558510.1080/09349847.2018.1475585 ↗
18. Kumar, S., Menaka, M., and Venkatraman, B., Radiographic simulation and validation studies on weld joints of annular tanks and cylindrical tanks, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. IOP Publ., 2019, vol. 554, no. 1, article no. 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/554/1/01200810.1088/1757-899X/554/1/012008 ↗
19. Yao, M., Kaftandjian, V., Peterzol-Parmentier, A., Schumm, A., and Duvauchelle, P., Hybrid Monte Carlo and deterministic simulation approach for modeling a computed radiography imaging chain from X-ray exposure to optical readout, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res.,Sect. A, 2019, vol. 941, article no. 162328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2019.06.06910.1016/j.nima.2019.06.069 ↗
20. Kengyelics, S.M., Treadgold, L.A., and Davies, A.G., X-ray system simulation software tools for radiology and radiography education, Comput. Biol. Med., 2018, vol. 93, pp. 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.12.00510.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.12.005 ↗
21. Udod, V.A., Osipov, S.P., and Wang, Y., The mathematical model of image, generated by scanning digital radiography system, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., IOP Publ., 2017, vol. 168, no. 1, article no. 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/168/1/01204210.1088/1757-899X/168/1/012042 ↗
22. Osipov, S.P., Chakhlov, S.V., Kairalapov, D.U., and Sirot’yan, E.V., Numerical modeling of radiographic images as the basis for correctly designing digital radiography systems of large-sized objects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2019, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091902005010.1134/S1061830919020050 ↗
23. Zav’yalkin, F.M. and Osipov, S.P., Dependence of the mean value and fluctuations of the absorbed energy on the scintillator dimensions, Sov. At. Energy, 1985, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 842–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0112331710.1007/BF01123317 ↗
24. ASTM E1025. Standard practice for design, manufacture, and material grouping classification of hole-type image quality indicators (IQI) used for radiology, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
25. Halmshaw, R., Radiographic techniques: Principles, in Industrial Radiology, Dordrecht: Springer, 1995, pp. 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0551-4_710.1007/978-94-011-0551-4_7 ↗
26. Rueckel, J., Stockmar, M., Pfeiffer, F., and Herzen, J., Spatial resolution characterization of a X-ray microCT system, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 2014, vol. 94, pp. 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.08.01410.1016/j.apradiso.2014.08.014 ↗
27. Huda, W. and Abrahams, R.B., X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution, Am. J. Roentgenol., 2015, vol. 204, no. 4, pp. W393–W397. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.1312610.2214/ajr.14.13126 ↗
28. Du Plessis, A., Yadroitsava, I., and Yadroitsev, I., Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additivemanufacturing: a review focusing on X-ray tomography insights, Mater. Des., 2020, vol. 187, article no. 108385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10838510.1016/j.matdes.2019.108385 ↗