Application of the Jiles–Atherton Model of Magnetic Hysteresis to Analyzing the Spatial Distribution of Magnetic Fields and Induction in an Open-Loop Magnetic Circuit
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The paper presents a study on the application of the Jiles–Atherton magnetic hysteresis mathematical model. The optimal model parameters were selected based on measurement data in a closed-loop magnetic circuit and used to build digital models in COMSOL Multiphysics. Experimental studies on ferromagnetic steel samples with different magnetic properties demonstrated good agreement with the design data. The results showed that the deviation of the experimental values of the key characteristics (Bmax, Br, Hc) from the simulation results did not exceed 5%. Detailed pictures of the spatial distribution of magnetic induction and field strength in samples in different parts of the magnetic hysteresis loop were obtained. The verified model will allow further optimization of the designs of magnetizing devices and the location of sensors when developing new methods and means of magnetic nondestructive testing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Mikheev, M.N., and Gorkunov, E.S., Magnitnye metody strukturnogo analiza i nerazrushayushchego kontrolya (Magnetic Methods of Structural Analysis and Nondestructive Testing), Moscow: Nauka, 1993.
2. Klyuev, V.V., Nerazrushayushchiy kontrol' i diagnostika (Nondestructive Testing and Diagnostics), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 2004, vol. 3.
3. Tomás, I., and Gabor, V., Magnetic adaptive testing, in Nondestructive Testing Methods and New Applications, London: InTech, 2012, pp. 145–186.
4. Wolter, B., Gabi, Y., and Conrad, C., Nondestructive testing with 3MA—An overview of principles and applications, Appl. Sci., 2019, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 1068.10.3390/app9061068 ↗
5. Kostin, V.N., Osipova, A.A., Stashkov, A.N., and Tsar’kova, T.P., Multiparameter methods for structural analysis of steel articles using the magnetic properties of substances, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2004, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 197–208.10.1023/B:RUNT.0000040178.84848.54 ↗
6. Girshovichus, S.Kh., Kifer, I.I., and Selova, E.B., Method of multiparameter testing of parts made of ferromagnetic materials, SU Patent 280666 A1, 1970.
7. Vasilenko, O.N., Methods and means of multiparameter magnetic structuroscopy of products using composite open-loop magnetic circuits, Dissertation, Yekaterinburg: Mikheev Inst. Phys. Met., 2014.
8. Kostin, V.N., Osipova, A.A., Stashkov, A.N., Nichipuruk, A.P., Kostin, K.V., and Sazhina, E.Yu., Portable instruments for multiparameter magnetic evaluation of material structures, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 280–289.10.1134/S1061830908040086 ↗
9. Chechernikov, V.I., Magnitnye izmereniya (Magnetic Measurements), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1969.
10. Vonsovsky, S.V. and Shur, Ya.S., Ferromagnetizm (Ferromagnetism), Moscow—Leningrad: OGIZ, Gostekhizdat, 1948.
11. Chikazumi, S., Fizika ferromagnetizma. Magnitnye svoistva veshchestva (Physics of Ferromagnetism. Magnetic Properties of Matter), Moscow: Mir, 1983 (translated from Japanese).
12. Chikazumi, S., Fizika ferromagnetizma. Magnitnye kharakteristiki i prakticheskie primeneniya (Physics of Ferromagnetism. Magnetic Characteristics and Practical Applications), Moscow: Mir, 1987 (translated from Japanese).
13. Gabi, Y., Jacob, K., Wolter, B., Conrad, C., Strass, B., and Grimm, J., Analysis of incremental and differential permeability in NDT via 3D-simulation and experiment, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2020, vol. 505, p. 379–386, 166695.10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166695 ↗
14. Moura, E.P.D.A.G., Machado, A.S., and Gonçalves, L.L., Determination of carbon steel bar diameter by nondestructive magnetic testing, J. Nondestr. Eval., 2021, vol. 40, no. 3.10.1007/s10921-021-00791-9 ↗
15. COMSOL Multiphysics. https://www.comsol.com/.
16. IEC 60404-7:2019 Magnetic materials—Part 7: Method of measurement of coercivity (up to 160 kA/m) of magnetic materials in an open-loop magnetic circuit.
17. IEC 60404-4:1995 Magnetic materials—Part 4: Methods of measurement of d.c. magnetic properties of iron and steel.
18. Morée, G., and Leijon, M., Review of hysteresis models for magnetic materials, Energies, 2023, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1–66.10.3390/en16093908 ↗
19. Liu, Q., Zhou, J., Chu, J., Wang, S., Xin, Q., and Fu, C., Identification of Jiles–Atherton model parameters using improved genetic algorithm, 2020 IEEE 1st China Int. Youth Conf. Electr. Eng. (CIYCEE).10.1109/CIYCEE49808.2020.9332611 ↗
20. Jiles, D.C., and Atherton, D.L., Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis (invited), J. Appl. Phys., 1984, vol. 55, pp. 2115–2120.10.1063/1.333582 ↗
21. Jiles, D., and Atherton, D., Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1986, vol. 61, pp. 48–60.10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1 ↗
22. Jiles, D., and Thoelke, J., Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis: Determination of model parameters from experimental hysteresis loops, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1989, vol. 25, pp. 3928–3930.10.1109/20.42480 ↗
23. Jiles, D.C., Thoelke, J.B., and Devine, M.K., Numerical determination of hysteresis parameters for the modeling of magnetic properties using the theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis, IEEE Trans. Magn., 1992, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–35.10.1109/20.119813 ↗
24. Li, S., Li, R., Du, L., and Guo, Y., Identification of a hysteresis model parameters using the differential evolution algorithm, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, vol. 199, p. 012145.10.1088/1757-899X/199/1/012145 ↗
25. Zou, M., Parameter estimation of extended Jiles–Atherton hysteresis model based on ISFLA, IET Electr. Power Appl., 2020, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 212–219.10.1049/iet-epa.2019.0384 ↗
26. Jesenik, M., Mernik, M., and Triep, M., Determination of a hysteresis model parameters with the use of different evolutionary methods for an innovative hysteresis model, Mathematics, 2020, vol. 8, p. 201.10.3390/math8020201 ↗
27. Xue, G., Bai, H., Li, T., Ren, Z., Liu, X., and Lu, C., Numerical solving method for Jiles–Atherton model and influence analysis of the initial magnetic field on hysteresis, Mathematics, 2022, vol. 10, p. 4431.10.3390/math10234431 ↗
28. Podbereznaya, I.B., Algorithms for modeling magnetic hysteresis, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Elektromekh., 2015, no. 6, pp. 5–13.
29. Szewczyk, R. and Nowicki, M., Sensitivity of Jiles–Atherton model parameters identified during the optimization process, AIP Conf. Proc., 2018, vol. 1996, p. 020046.10.1063/1.5048898 ↗
30. Szewczyk, R., Progress in development of Jiles–Atherton model of magnetic hysteresis, AIP Conf. Proc., 2019, vol. 2131, p. 020045.10.1063/1.5119498 ↗
31. Szewczyk, R.,(Ed., Two step, differential evolution-based identification of parameters of Jiles–Atherton model of magnetic hysteresis loops, AUTOMATION 2018, AISC (2018), vol. 743, pp. 635–641.
32. Preisach, F., Über die magnetische Nachwirkung, Z. Phys., 1935, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 277–302.10.1007/BF01349418 ↗
33. Nichipuruk, A.P., Model of magnetic hysteresis and its application in magnetic structuroscopy of structural steels, Dissertation, Yekaterinburg: Mikheev Inst. Phys. Met., 2008.