Application of Texture Filtering in Clustering of X-ray Computed Tomography Data of Products Made from Polymer Composite Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is one of the most informative methods of nondestructive testing of polymer composite materials (PCMs) and products made of them. One of the important stages of the XCT of PCM products is segmentation, the automation of which is of research interest. In the segmentation process, it is important to identify isotexture zones containing local X-ray density variations. In this paper we investigate the possibilities of three-dimensional texture filtering (Gaussian filter, Gabor filters) in clustering of X-ray computed tomography data by simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) algorithm and evaluated their efficiency in terms of parameters: the share of mismatch between the boundaries of clusters and the boundaries of segmented areas and sphericity of clusters, as well as the performance in terms of the time to partition the dataset into the required number of clusters. The results of the study show that the application of three-dimensional texture filters improves the clustering accuracy and sphericity of isotexture clusters of PCM product XCT data without any considerable increase in clustering time compared to the raw data. The maximum increase in clustering accuracy was observed when using a combination of Gaussian and Gabor filters, while clustering time increased.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Dhakate, P.D. and Chordia, S.N., Shape memory polymers and composites in aerospace applications, Int. J. Eng. Res., 2020, vol. 9, no. 11.
2. Valueva, M.I., Evdokimov, A.A., Nacharkina, A.V., and Gubin, A.M., Polymer composite materials and technologies in the automotive industry, Tr. VIAM, 2022, no. 1, pp. 53–65.10.18577/2307-6046-2022-0-1-53-65 ↗
3. Ramakrishna, S., Mayer, J., Wintermantel, E., and Leong, K.W., Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: A review, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2001, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1189–1224.10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00241-4 ↗
4. Pires, L., Magalhães, F., and Moreira Pinto, A., New polymeric composites based on two-dimensional nanomaterials for biomedical applications, Polymers, 2022, vol. 14, p. 1464.10.3390/polym14071464 ↗
5. Oladele, I., Adelani, S., Agbabiaka, O., and Adegun, M., Applications and disposal of polymers and polymer composites: a review, Appl. Disposal Polym. Polym. Compos., 2022, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 65–89.
6. Chen, J., Yu, Z., and Jin, H., Nondestructive testing and evaluation techniques of defects in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review, Frontiers Mater., 2022, vol. 9.10.3389/fmats.2022.986645 ↗
7. Garcea, S.C., Wang, Y., and Withers, P., X-ray computed tomography of polymer composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2017, vol. 156.10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.023 ↗
8. Straumit, I., Lomov, S., and Wevers, M., Quantification of the internal structure and automatic generation of voxel models of textile composites from X-ray computed tomography data, Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2015, vol. 69.10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.016 ↗
9. Berg, S., Saxena, N., Shaik, M., and Pradhan, C., Generation of ground truth images to validate micro-CT image-processing pipelines, Leading Edge, 2018, vol. 37, pp. 412–420.10.1190/tle37060412.1 ↗
10. Distante, A. and Distante, C., Handbook of Image Processing and Computer Vision, Cham: Springer, 2020, vol. 2.10.1007/978-3-030-42378-0 ↗
11. Chauhan, S., Rühaak, W., Khan, F., Enzmann, F., Mielke, P., Kersten, M., and Sass, I., Processing of rock core microtomography images: Using seven different machine learning algorithms, Comput. & Geosci., 2016, vol. 86, pp. 120–128.10.1016/j.cageo.2015.10.013 ↗
12. Taneja, A., Ranjan, P., and Ujjlayan, A., A performance study of image segmentation techniques, 2015 4th Int. Conf. Reliability Infocom Technol. Optim. (ICRITO) (Trends and Future Directions) (Noida, 2015), pp. 1–6.10.1109/ICRITO.2015.7359305 ↗
13. Mendoza, A., Trullo, R., and Wielhorski, Y., Descriptive modeling of textiles using FE simulations and deep learning, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2021, vol. 213.10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108897 ↗
14. Sinchuk, Y., Kibleur, P., Aelterman, J., Boone, M., and Van Paepegem, W., Variational and deep learning segmentation of very-low-contrast X-ray computed tomography images of carbon/epoxy woven composites, Materials, 2020, vol. 13, p. 936.10.3390/ma13040936 ↗
15. Auenhammer, R., Mikkelsen, L., Asp, L., and Blinzler, B., Automated X-ray computer tomography segmentation method for finite element analysis of non-crimp fabric reinforced composites, Compos. Struct., 2020, vol. 256, p. 113136.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113136 ↗
16. Sukemi, Sukrisno, E., Identification using the K-means clustering and gray level co-occurance matrix (GLCM) at maturity fruit oil head, 2019 Fourth Int. Conf. Inf. Comput. (ICIC) (Semarang, 2019), pp. 1–4.10.1109/ICIC47613.2019.8985681 ↗
17. Zhou, B., Image segmentation using slic superpixels and affinity propagation clustering, Int. J. Sci. Res., 2015, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1525–1529.
18. Lowekamp, B., Chen, D., Yaniv, Z., and Yoo, T., Scalable Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SSLIC) Using a generic and parallel approach, Insight J., 2018.10.54294/8hic7f ↗
19. Nowosad, J., Stepinski, T.F., Extended SLIC superpixels algorithm for applications to non-imagery geospatial rasters, Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf., 2022, vol. 112, p. 102935.10.1016/j.jag.2022.102935 ↗
20. Fedorov, A., Beichel, R., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Finet, J., Fillion-Robin, J.-C., Pujol, S., Bauer, C., Jennings, D., Fennessy, F., Sonka, M., Buatti, J., Aylward, S., Miller, J.V., Pieper, S., and Kikinis, R., 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network, Magn. Resonance Imag., 2012, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1323–1341.10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 ↗
21. Zack, G.W., Rogers, W.E., and Latt, S.A., Automatic measurement of sister chromatid exchange frequency, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 1977, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 741–753.10.1177/25.7.70454 ↗