Fatigue Behavior of Small Bore Piping Welded Joints under Vibration: Metallurgical and Nondestructive Evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The integrity of small-bore piping welds, typically up to 50 mm in diameter, is crucial for reliable operation in industrial settings, particularly under vibration-induced stresses that can lead to fatigue failures. This study provided an in-depth analysis of the fatigue behavior of V-groove butt weld joints in small-bore steel piping systems under vibration conditions, focusing on the influence of various weld filler metals and base materials. An advanced experimental setup simulated dynamic vibrations to examine the effects of different welding wire compositions on fatigue strength, damage susceptibility, and fracture tendencies. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was employed to investigate stress distributions, revealing significant stress concentrations and deviations from the acceptable fatigue limits defined by industry standards. The study utilized nondestructive testing methods, including magnetic particle inspection (MPI) and radiographic testing (RT) were used to identify and monitor weld discontinuities, emphasizing the importance of continuous inspection with these methods to ensure weld integrity under dynamic loading conditions. Microstructural analysis revealed that manganese-enriched welds promote acicular ferrite formation, enhancing hardness, while high nickel content increases discontinuities and lowers toughness. Optimal manganese levels (0.6–1.4 wt %) improve mechanical properties, but excessive manganese combined with nickel adversely affects fatigue performance. The study emphasized the need for optimized alloy composition and design to enhance fatigue resistance in small-bore pipe welds, offering insights for improving long-term reliability. This research deepened the understanding of vibration-induced fatigue and informed better design and maintenance protocols for steel piping systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Chryssanthopoulos, M.K., Righiniotis, T.D., Fatigue reliability of welded steel structures, J. Constr. Steel Res., 2006, vol. 62, p. 1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.00710.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.007 ↗
2. Lawrence, M.M. and Gyorgy, S., Vibration and fatigue failures at pipeline facilities, 12th Int. Pipeline Conf. (Calgary, 2018).
3. Noda, M., Suzuki, M., Maekawa, A., Sasaki, T., Suyama, T., and Fujita, K., Methods of evaluating vibration induced stress of small-bore piping, ASME 2006 ICPVT-11 Conf. (Vancouver, 2006). https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2006-ICPVT-11-9319810.1115/PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93198 ↗
4. Kang, G. and Luo, H., Review on fatigue life prediction models of welded joint, Acta Mech. Sin., 2020, vol. 36, p. 701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-020-00957-010.1007/s10409-020-00957-0 ↗
5. Maddox, S.J., Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures, Nashville: Abington, 1991.
6. Norsok L-002:1997: Piping Design, Layout and Stress Analysis, Norway, 1997.
7. Guidelines for the Avoidance of Vibration Induced Fatigue Failure in Process Pipework, London: UK Energy Inst., 2008.
8. API 579-1/ASME FFS-1:2016, Fitness for service, Washington D.C.: Am. Pet. Inst., 2021.
9. BS 7910:2013, Guide on Methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, 2015.
10. Yeh, C.L., Lee W.J., and Yang, T.C., Analysis of small bore-piping vibration phenomenon, IEEE 3rd Eurasia Conf. IOT Commun. Eng. (ECICE) (Yunlin, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECICE52819.2021.964572410.1109/ECICE52819.2021.9645724 ↗
11. Harper, C.B., Integrity evaluation of small bore connections (branch connections), Proc. 9th Conf. EFRC (Vienna, 2014).
12. Schijve, J., Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art, Int. J. Fatigue, 2003, vol. 25, p. 679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-310.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-3 ↗
13. Yaoguo, X., Chengang, G., Puzhe, W., Lei Z., Chuanjie, Z., and Xianqiang, Q., Research on vibration fatigue damage locations of offshore oil and gas pipelines based on the GA-improved BP neural network, Shock & Vib., 2023, vol. 5, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/253065110.1155/2023/2530651 ↗
14. Macdonald, K.A., Fracture and Fatigue of Welded Joints and Structures, Cambrdige: Woodhead, 2011.10.1533/9780857092502 ↗
15. Xue, F., Wang, Z.X., Lin, L., Ti, W.X., Gong, M.X., Liu, P., and Shu, G.G., Experimental and numerical evaluation of the vibration fatigue of small bore pipe in PWR, Adv. Mater. Res., 2010, vol. 97, p. 848. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.97-101.84810.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.97-101.848 ↗
16. Higuchi, M., Nakagawa, A., Iida, K., Hayashi, M., Yamauchi, T., Saito, M., and Sato, M., Experimental study on fatigue strength of small-diameter socket-welded pipe joints, ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1998, vol. 120, p. 149. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.284223310.1115/1.2842233 ↗
17. Xiu, J.J., Jing, H.Y., Han, Y.D., Zhao, L., and Xu, L.Y., Effects of radial gap and penetration depth on vibration fatigue behaviour of 304L stainless steel piping with socket weld, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 28, p. 850. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284712Y.000000002010.1179/1743284712Y.0000000020 ↗
18. BPVC.III.1.NB ASME: Rules for construction of nuclear facility components-division 1-subsection NB-class 1 components, USA, 2023.
19. Haagensen, P.J., Fatigue improvement techniques — Advantages and limitations, Weld. Int., 2003, vol. 47, p. 43.
20. Junjie, X., Yang, L., and Yiyuan, C., Effects of stress concentration and residual stress on vibration fatigue behavior of socket weld, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2017, vol. 32, p. 375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.135572610.1080/01694243.2017.1355726 ↗
21. Higuchi, M., Makoto, H., Takayoshi, Y., Kunihiro, I., and Masanobu, S., Fatigue Strength of Socket Welded Pipe Joint, Washington D.C.: US Dep. Energy, 1995.
22. Van Zyl, G. and Brodzinsky, R., Parametric study on the vibration of small-bore piping branch connections, Proc. Vol. 2 Comput. Technol. Bolted Joints Des. Anal. (Las Vegas, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2022-8411910.1115/PVP2022-84119 ↗
23. ASME B31.3:2022, ASME code for pressure piping, USA, 2022.
24. ASTM A106/A106M-10:2010, Standard specification for seamless carbon steel pipe for high temperature service, USA, 2010.
25. ASTM A105/A105M-03:2013, Standard specification for carbon steel forgings for piping applications, USA, 2013.
26. Modern Casting Ltd., ASTM A216 Laboratory Report, Türkiye, 2020.
27. A216/A216M-12:2012, Standard specification for steel castings, carbon, suitable for fusion welding for high-temperature service, USA, 2012.
28. UTP A 6222 Mo Product Brochure, Linz: Voestalpine, 2014.
29. AS TIG SG2 Product Brochure, Cleveland: Lincoln Electr., 2020.
30. TKN-PCD-QAC-GEN-23, Welding procedure specification, Türkiye, 2020.
31. ASME SEC. IX:2019, Welding, brazing, and fusing qualifications, USA, 2019.
32. ASME SEC. V:2021, Nondestructive examination, USA, 2021.
33. BS 7608, Fatigue design and assessment of steel structures, UK, 1993.
34. IIW Doc. No. IX-1533-88:1988, Guide to the light microscope examination of ferritic steel metal welds, 1988.
35. Vander Voort, G.F., ASM Handbook, 2005, vol. 9.
36. Wachel, J.C., Bates, C.L., ASME Paper 76-PET-18, USA, 1976.
37. Zhang, Z., Farrar, R.A., Influence of Mn and Ni on the microstructure and toughness of C–Mn–Ni weld metals, Weld. J., 1997, vol. 76, p. 183.