Synthetic Aperture Imaging in Cylindrical Component Using Ultrasonic Immersion Forward Vector Algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract—Ultrasonic nondestructive testing has been widely used in the detection and evaluation of fatigue cracks and defects of high-speed railway. In order to improve the detection speed of cylindrical components such as rims, a theoretical model of the forward vector algorithm of ultrasonic immersion curved surface is established. For improving image quality, an averaging correction factor is introduced in this paper to avoid multiple irradiation of the same pixel by the same element, and the visualization of cylindrical components with internal defects is realized by simulation and experiment. The traditional synthetic aperture focusing technique (SAFT), Newton iterative synthetic aperture (NISA) and ultrasonic forward vector algorithm (UFVA) are compared and analyzed on the aspects of imaging effect, array performance index (API) and imaging efficiency. Compared with the other two algorithms, the ultrasonic forward vector algorithm can effectively overcome the iteration of calculation of the refraction point and improve the imaging efficiency. The efficiency is improved by 2 and 1 orders of magnitude respectively while imaging quality is guaranteed. At the same time, this algorithm plays an important role on the measurement of the inner and outer diameter of the rim, the defect detection, and the quantitative analysis of the surface wear, which provides an effective means for the rapid detection of internal defects of the regular curved parts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Chaoyong, P., Long, B., Jie, Z., et al., The sizing of small surface-breaking fatigue cracks using ultrasonic arrays, NDT & E Int.,& 2018, vol. 99, pp. 64–71.10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.06.005 ↗
2. Li, W. and Zhang, H., A FPGA based ultrasonic rail flaw detection system, in 2017 IEEE Int. Symp. Signal Process. Inf. Technol. (ISSPIT), IEEE, 2017.10.1109/ISSPIT.2017.8388633 ↗
3. Jun, Y., Jian-Wei, Z., and Lei, X.U., Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wheel rim defects, Phys. Exam. Test., 2017.
4. Schuster, G.J., Doctor, S.R., and Bond, L.J., A system for high-resolution, nondestructive, ultrasonic imaging of weld grains, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 2004, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1526–1532.10.1109/TIM.2004.834072 ↗
5. Krause, M., Wiggenhauser, H., and Wilsch, G., Advanced pulse echo method for ultrasonic testing of concrete, NDT & E Int., 1993, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 261–261(1).10.1016/S0963-8695(97)88965-7 ↗
6. Bazulin, E.G., Obtaining flaw images by the SAFT method taking the variable velocity of sound in a test object into account, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2010, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 789–797.10.1134/S106183091011001X ↗
7. Net, N., Ultrasonic phased array system for railroad axle examination, E-J. Nondestr. Test., 2002, no. 3.
8. Peng Hu, Introduction to Ultrasound Imaging Algorithms, Univ. Sci. Technol. China Press, 2008.
9. Martín-Arguedas, C.J., Romero-Laorden, D., Martínez-Graullera, O., et al., An ultrasonic imaging system based on a new SAFT approach and a GPU beamformer, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2012, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1402–1412.10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2341 ↗
10. Ogilvy, J.A., An iterative ray tracing model for ultrasonic nondestructive testing, Nondestr. Test. Eval. Int., 1992, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–10.
11. Hu, H., Du, J., Xu, N., et al., Ultrasonic sparse-TFM imaging for a two-layer medium using genetic algorithm optimization and effective aperture correction, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 90, pp. 24–32.10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.05.002 ↗
12. Hu Hongwei, Du Jian, Li Yang, et al., Two-layer medium ultrasonic phased array full focus imaging based on sparse matrix, J. Mech. Eng., 2017, vol. 53, no. 14, pp. 128–135.10.3901/JME.2017.14.128 ↗
13. Moreau, L., Drinkwater, B.W., and Wilcox, P.D., Ultrasonic imaging algorithms with limited transmission cycles for rapid nondestructive evaluation, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2009, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1932–1944.10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1269 ↗
14. Segovia, A., Li, X., and Gao, G., Iterative layer-based raytracing on CUDA, in Perform. Comput. Commun. Conf., IEEE, 2009, pp. 248–255.10.1109/PCCC.2009.5403843 ↗
15. Guo, J.Q., Li, X., Gao, X., et al., Implementation of total focusing method for phased array ultrasonic imaging on FPGA, in Int. Symp. Precis. Eng. Meas. Instrum., Int. Soc. Opt. Photonics, 2015.10.1117/12.2180964 ↗
16. Drinkwater, B.W. and Bowler, A.I., Ultrasonic array inspection of the Clifton Suspension Bridge chain-links, Insight (Northampton, U.K.), 2009, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 491–498.
17. Zhang, J., Drinkwater, B.W., and Wilcox, P.D., Efficient immersion imaging of components with nonplanar surfaces, IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2014, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1284–1295.10.1109/TUFFC.2014.3035 ↗
18. Bazulin, E.G. and Rukhailo, N.V., Determination of the profile of the surface of a test object during automated nondestructive ultrasonic testing in the immersion mode and reconstruction of flaw images using the SAFT method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2012, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 457–467.10.1134/S1061830912080025 ↗
19. Burch, S.F., Comparison of SAFT and two-dimensional deconvolution methods for the improvement of resolution in ultrasonic B-scan images, Ultrasonics, 1987, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 259–266.10.1016/0041-624X(87)90047-3 ↗
20. Yang, C., Qin, K., and Li, Y., Real-time ultrasonic imaging for multi-layered objects with synthetic aperture focusing technique, in Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf., IEEE, 2014.10.1109/I2MTC.2014.6860807 ↗
21. Hearn, D. and Baker, M. P., Computer Graphics with Open GL, Prentice Hall, 2003, 3rd ed.
22. Jeune, L.L., Robert, S., Dumas, P., et al., Adaptive ultrasonic imaging with the total focusing method for inspection of complex components immersed in water, 2015, pp. 1037–1046.10.1063/1.4914712 ↗
23. Holmes, C., Drinkwater, B.W., and Wilcox, P.D., Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation, NDT & E Int., 2005, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 701–711.10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗