Discrete Wavelet Transform based Denoising of TOFD Signals of Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld at Elevated Temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
—Time of flight Diffraction technique is an advanced ultrasonic NDE methods, adopted in weld integrity testing. During the Time of flight Diffraction (TOFD) inspection of the stainless steel welds at high temperature, grain scattering noise is developed. In Time of flight Diffraction testing, the quality of the signal plays a dominant role in characterizing the defects. Hence, signal denoising is an essential prerequisite for the successful application of Time of flight Diffraction testing. In this work, one austenitic stainless steel weldment was artificially induced with slag defect. At high temperatures, the Time of flight Diffraction testing has been conducted on the weld piece and the resultant signals are applied over the proposed algorithms. Various combinations of wavelets, decomposition levels with different thresholding levels are applied to select an optimum denoising method. The evaluation of wavelet based denoising is achieved by calculating the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR). Results show that the noises can be suppressed well and Signal to Noise Ratio is improved.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Subbaratnam, R., Abraham, S.T., Menaka, M., Venkatraman, B., and Raj, B., Time of flight diffraction testing of austenitic stainless steel weldments at elevated temperatures, Mater. Eval., 2008, vol. 66, pp. 332–337.
2. Pardikar, R.J., Sony Baby, and Balasubramanian, T., Ultrasonic study for the flaw detectability in ferritic butt welds at high temperatures, Natl. Semin. ISNT, Indian Nondestr. Test., 2002.
3. Verkooijen, J. and McLay, A., Advances with the time of flight diffraction technique, MAT & TEST, 2005, vol. 5.
4. Drai, R., Sellidj, F., Khelil, M., and Benchaala, A., Elaboration of some signal processing algorithms in ultrasonic techniques: appl to materials NDT, Ultrasonics, Elsevier, 2000, vol. 38, pp. 503–507.10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00082-7 ↗
5. Qi Tian and Bilgutay, N.M., Statistical analysis of split spectrum processing for multiple target detection, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Eng., 1998, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 251–256.10.1109/58.646929 ↗
6. Legendre, S., Goyette, J., and Massicotte, D., Ultrasonic NDE of composite material structures using wavelet coefficients, NDT & E Int., 2001, vol. 34, pp. 31–37.10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00029-3 ↗
7. Pandian, R. and Vigneswaran, T., Dr., Adaptive wavelet packet basis selection for zero tree image coding, Int. J. Signal Imaging Syst. Eng., 2016, vol. 9, no. 6.10.1504/IJSISE.2016.080272 ↗
8. Udo Schlengermann, The European TOFD Standard Draft ENV 583-6 and The British TOFD Standard BS 7706, 1993.
9. Shyamal Mondal and Sattar, T., Dr., An overview of ToFD method and its mathematical model, NDT.net, April, 2000.
10. Hong-Wei, M.A. and Wang Bin, Application of wavelet rransform to signal de-noising in ultrasonic testing, NDT, 2004, vol. 26, pp. 68–71.
11. Zhou Wei, Advanced Technology of Wavelet Analysis Based on MATLAB, Xi’an: Xi Dian Univ., 2006.
12. Wang, Y., Chen, S.J., and Liu, S.J., Best wavelet basis for wavelet transforms in acoustic emission signals of concrete damage process, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 125–133.10.1134/S1061830916030104 ↗
13. Yong Han and Guo-Guang Chen, Maximum kurtosis principle for the parameter selection of Gabor wavelet and its application to ultrasonic signal processing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2009, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 436–443.10.1134/S1061830909060084 ↗