Contribution to the issue of evaluating the compressive strength of concrete exposed to high temperatures using the Schmidt rebound hammer
Source abstract
Abstract
Concrete properties change as a result of ambient conditions. The internal microstructure changes under high temperatures. As a consequence, this change affects both physical and mechanical properties of concrete and therefore the parameters determined from nondestructive testing. It was determined that for concrete exposed to temperatures in the range of 200 to 400°C the rebound number measured by the rebound hammer is approximately 9% higher after heat load than for wet concrete placed in a standard environment. Temperatures from 600 to 800°C cause a drop in the rebound number, which correlates with a decrease in the concrete’s compressive strength. A strength dependency was established for the N-type Schmidt rebound hammer expressing the relationship between the rebound number and the compressive strength of concrete exposed to heat load, which is characterized by a high correlation between variables (correlation coefficient is 0.98). To estimate the compressive strength of concrete in a structure which has been exposed by fire, can be used both the calculated strength relationship, both the calibration curves for N-type Schmidt rebound hammer calculated by manufacturer, eventually the basic curve from CSN EN 13791. If the calibration equation for N-type Schmidt rebound hammer or basic curve of CSN EN 13791 is taken, the calculated strength for the rebound numbers should be lowered using the corrective coefficient, the value of which is 0.54, respectively 0.65.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on concrete materials · Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Tanyidzit, P. and Coskun, A., Determination of the principal parameter of ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of lightweight concrete by using variance method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 639–646.10.1134/S1061830908090088 ↗
2. Turgut, P. and Kucuk, O.F., Comparative relationships of direct, indirect, and semi-direct ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements in concrete, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 745–751.10.1134/S1061830906110064 ↗
3. Zülfü, C., Ulucan Kazím Türk, and Mehmet Karatas, Effect of mineral admixtures on the correlation between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for self-compacting concrete, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2008, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 367–374.10.1134/S1061830908050100 ↗
4. Brozovsky, J., Bodnarova, L., Hela, R., Drochytka, R., and Hela, V., Evaluation of degradation of concrete exposed to high temperature by means of ultrasonic pulse method, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2012, vols. 284–287, pp. 1315–1319.
5. Olomo, O., Aderinlewo, O., Tanimola, M., and Croope, S., Assessment of the material properties of a fire damaged building, Constructii, 2012, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 16–23.
6. Olowofoyeku, M. and Olutoge, F.A., Domestication of pundit non-destructive test chart in measuring compressive strength of normal strength concrete subjected to elevated temperature, Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2013, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–6.
7. Brozovsky, J., High-strength concrete—NDT with rebound hammer: influence of aggregate on test results, Nondestr. Test. Eval., 2014, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 255–268.10.1080/10589759.2014.926897 ↗
8. Soshiroda, T. and Voraputhaporn, K., Recommended method for earlier inspection of concrete quality by nondestructive testing, in Concrete Durability and Repair Technology, Dundee, 1999, pp. 259–264.
9. Khoury, G.A., Compressive strength of concrete at high temperatures: a reassessment, Mag. Concr. Res., 1992, vol. 44, no. 161, pp. 291–309.10.1680/macr.1992.44.161.291 ↗
10. Kodur, V., Properties of concrete at elevated temperatures, ISRN Civil Engineering, 2014, vol. 2014, p. 15.10.1155/2014/468510 ↗
11. Bodnarova, L., Valek, J., Sitek, L., and Foldyna, J., Effect of high temperatures on cement composite materials in concrete structures, Acta Geodyn. Geomater., 2013, vol. 10, no. 2(170), pp. 173–180.10.13168/AGG.2013.0017 ↗
12. Brencich, A., Cassini, G., Pera, D., and Riotto, G., Calibration and reliability of the rebound (Schmidt) Hammer test, Civ. Eng. Archit., 2013, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 66–78.
13. Malhotra, V.N. and Carino, N.J., Handbook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete, Cleveland: CRC Press, 2004, 2nd ed., p. 362.
14. Kim, J.K., Kim, C.Y., Yi, S.T., and Lee, Y., Effect of carbonation on the rebound number and compressive strength of concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 2008, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 139–144.10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.10.001 ↗
15. Awoyera, P.O., Akinwuni, I.I., Ede, A.E., and Olofinnade, M.O., Forensic investigation of fire-affected reinforced concrete buildings, IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng., 2014, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 17–23.
16. Nasser, K.W. and Almanaseer, A.A., Comparison of nondestructive testers of hardened concrete, ACI Mater. J., 1987, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 374–380.
17. Han, B., Yang, Z., Shi, X., and Yu, X., Transport properties of carbon-nanotube/cement composites carbon nanotubes, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, vol. 22(1), pp. 184–189.10.1007/s11665-012-0228-x ↗
18. Bangi, M.R. and Horiguchi, T., Pore pressure development in hybrid fibre-reinforced high strength concrete at elevated temperatures, Cem. Concr. Res., 2013, vol. 41(11), pp. 1150–1156.10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.07.001 ↗
19. ASTM C805. Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 2008.
20. CSN 731373. Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete—Determination of Compressive Strength by Hardness Testing Methods, Czech Standards Institute, Prague, 2011. [in Czech].
21. CSN EN 12390-1. Testing Hardened Concrete. Part 1: Shape, Dimensions and Other Requirements of Specimens and Moulds, Czech Standards Institute, Czech Republic, 2009.
22. CSN EN 12390-2. Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 2: Making and Curing Specimens for Strength Tests, Prague, 2009.
23. CSN EN 12390-3. Testing Hardened Concrete—Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens, Czech Standards Institute, Prague, 2009.
24. CSN EN 12504-2. Testing Concrete in Structures—Part 2: Non-Destructive Testing—Determination of Rebound Number, Czech Standards Institute, Prague, 2013.
25. CSN EN 13791. Assessment of In-Situ Compressive Strength in Structures and Precast Concrete Components, Czech Standards Institute, Prague, 2007.
26. GOST (State Standard) 22690-88: Concretes. Determination of Strength by Mechanical Methods of Nondestructive Testing, Moscow: Standartinform, 2010.
27. GOST (State Standard) 10180-2012: Concretes. Methods for Strength Determination Using Reference Specimens, Moscow: Standartinform, 2013.
28. JGJ/T23-2001. Technical Specification for Inspection of Concrete Compressive Strength by Rebound Method, PRC, Ministry of Construction, 2001. [in Chinese].
29. PROCEQ SA Operating Instructions Concrete Test Hammer Types N and NR., PROCEQ SA, Zurich, 1977, p. 15.