Ultrasonic-Based Impact Energy Level Prediction in Composite Materials Using Sequential Backward Selection and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Accurately predicting impact energy levels in glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites is crucial for assessing material performance under varying impact conditions. This study presents a novel methodology that integrates sequential backward selection (SBS) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to enhance the precision of impact energy estimation using non-destructive evaluation techniques. The proposed approach begins with the application of controlled impact energies to composite specimens, followed by ultrasonic inspection using the Mistras system to acquire B-scan and C-scan images. These images are subsequently converted into representative signals, from which key indicators are extracted. To optimize computational efficiency and improve predictive accuracy, SBS is employed to systematically select the most relevant features, minimizing redundancy and noise. The refined feature set is then used as input for an ANFIS model, which effectively captures nonlinear relationships between ultrasonic data and impact energy levels. The results demonstrate the potential of integrating advanced machine learning techniques with ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation for precise and reliable impact energy prediction in composite materials. This methodology provides a robust framework for structural health monitoring and predictive maintenance in industries where composite integrity is a critical concern.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Engineering Applied Research · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhong, M. et al., Review of composite materials and applications, Mater. Today Proc., 2023.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.026 ↗
2. Fan, J. and Njuguna, J., An introduction to lightweight composite materials and their use in transport structures, in Lightweight Composite Structures in Transport, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 3–34.
3. Frik, M., Benkedjouh, T., Bouzar Essaidi, A., and Boumediene, F., Advancing damage assessment of CFRP-composite through BILSTM and Hilbert upper envelope analysis, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2023, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1241–1258.10.1134/S106183092360082X ↗
4. Zhao, K., Ge, Z., Huo, L., Gao, Y., Zhou, Y., and Yao, Z., Application progress and prospect of defect detection technology for timber structure members, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 455–469.10.1134/S1061830924600217 ↗
5. Wang, B., Zhong, S., Lee, T.-L., Fancey, K.S., and Mi, J., Non-destructive testing and evaluation of composite materials/structures: A state-of-the-art review, Adv. Mech. Eng., 2020, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 1687814020913761.10.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
6. Gupta, R. et al., A review of sensing technologies for non-destructive evaluation of structural composite materials, J. Compos. Sci., 2021, vol. 5, no. 12, p. 319.10.3390/jcs5120319 ↗
7. Potapov, A. and Makhov, V., Methods for nondestructive testing and diagnostics of durability of articles made of polymer composite materials, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2018, vol. 54, pp. 151–163.10.1134/S1061830918030087 ↗
8. Mogil’ner, L.Y., Syas’ko, V., and Shikhov, A., Modeling defects in ultrasonic nondestructive testing: State-of-the-art and prospects, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 481–500.10.1134/S1061830924700657 ↗
9. Bouzar Essaidi, A., Lourari, A., El Yousfi, B., and Benkedjouh, T., Nondestructive Testing of Composite Materials: An In-Depth Study Using Ultrasonic Immersion Inspection, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2024, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 750–763.10.1134/S1061830924600035 ↗
10. Lourari, A.W., El Yousfi, B., Benkedjouh, T., Bouzar Essaidi, A., and Soualhi, A., Enhancing bearing and gear fault diagnosis: A VMD-PSO approach with multisensory signal integration, J. Vib. Control, 2024, p. 10775463241273842.10.1177/10775463241273842 ↗
11. Khaire, U.M. and Dhanalakshmi, R., Stability of feature selection algorithm: A review, J. King Saud Univ.-Comput. Inf. Sci., 2022, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1060–1073.10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.06.012 ↗
12. Lourari, A.W., Benkedjouh, T., El Yousfi, B., and Soualhi, A., An ANFIS-based framework for the prediction of bearing’s remaining useful life, Int. J. Progn. Health Manage., 2024, vol. 15, no. 1.10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i1.3791 ↗
13. Davies, G.A. and Zhang, X., Impact damage prediction in carbon composite structures, Int. J. Impact Eng., 1995, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 149–170.10.1016/0734-743X(94)00039-Y ↗
14. Razali, N., Sultan, M., Mustapha, F., Yidris, N., and Ishak, M., Impact damage on composite structures—a review, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 2014, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 8–20.
15. Jang, J.-S.R., ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1993, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 665–685, https://doi.org/10.1109/21.25654110.1109/21.256541 ↗
16. Abraham, A., Adaptation of fuzzy inference system using neural learning, in Fuzzy Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, Springer, 2005, pp. 53–83, https://doi.org/10.1007/11339366_310.1007/11339366_3 ↗
17. Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Rangan, D.M., and Ramasastri, K.S., Short-term flood forecasting with a neurofuzzy model, Water Resour. Res., 2005, vol. 41, no. 4, p. W04004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR00356210.1029/2004WR003562 ↗
18. Nauck, D. and Kruse, R., Neuro-fuzzy systems, in Handbook of Fuzzy Computation, CRC Press, 2020, pp. 319-D2.
19. Arora, I. and Saha, A., ELM and KELM based software defect prediction using feature selection techniques, J. Inf. Optim. Sci., 2019, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1025–1045.