journal article·2025-09

Ultrasonic Phased Array-Based Wave Velocity Inversion and Migration Imaging Method for Hardened Layers

Fei Hui, Shupeng Geng, Fu Zhao, Shaofeng Wang, Xin Wang, Chunguang Yang, Donghui Zhao, Jie Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Hardened layer depth detection is a key technical indicator for evaluating the comprehensive performance of steel parts such as surface hardness and fatigue strength. Through establishing a numerical model of alloy steel heat treatment, this study innovatively proposes an ultrasonic phased-array based method for hardened layer velocity inversion and interface detection imaging. The research reveals that the time-distance curves of reflected waves received by multiple array elements exhibit characteristic hyperbolic features in the common midpoint gather domain. Velocity inversion was achieved by extracting the maximum energy of hyperbolic wavefield coherence in corresponding common midpoint gathers through velocity scanning. Building upon these findings, $$f{\kern 1pt} - {\kern 1pt} k$$ wave equation offset technology is used to effectively solve the problem of uneven distribution or inclined interface imaging of the hardened layer caused by different heat treatment processes such as laser quenching. As a result, the relative error (RE) and root mean square error (RMSE) obtained by the hardened layer horizontal interface imaging obtained by this method are controlled at 1% and 0.03 mm and inclined interface are controlled at 1.5% and 0.04 mm respectively, with high detection accuracy and imaging resolution. This study provides a new technical approach for the nondestructive detection and characterization of complex surface modified layers (such as gradient coatings, nonuniform quenching layers, etc.).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography · Flow Measurement and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao, J., Li, C., Zhan, H., et al., Study on laser quenching of aircraft gears with rectangular beam based on multi-field coupling mechanism, Appl. Phys. A, 2025, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 1–21.10.1007/s00339-024-08174-3 ↗
2. Yu, Z., Li, C., Chen, Z., et al., Sensitivity analysis of laser quenching parameters of ASTM 1045 of disk laser based on response surface method, Met. Mater. Int., 2021, vol. 27, pp. 1236–1251.10.1007/s12540-019-00437-6 ↗
3. Kobayashi, S., Takahashi, H., and Kamada, Y., Evaluation of case depth in induction-hardened steels: Magnetic hysteresis measurements and hardness-depth profiling by differential permeability analysis, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2013, vol. 343, pp. 112–118.10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.04.082 ↗
4. Gotoh, Y., Onita, S., Horino, T., et al., Detecting method of hardened depth in surface-hardened steel by magnetic field on steel, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2018, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1–4.
5. Singer, F. and Kufner, M., Model based laser-ultrasound determination of hardness gradients of gas-carburized steel, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 88, pp. 24–32.10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.02.006 ↗
6. Libby, H.L., Introduction to Electromagnetic Nondestructive Test Methods, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971, pp. 258–268.
7. Sophian, A., Tian, G., and Fan, M., Pulsed eddy current nondestructive testing and evaluation: A review, Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 2017, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 500–514.10.1007/s10033-017-0122-4 ↗
8. Zhang, D., Yao, L., and Zhao, H., Signal processing of ultrasonic testing of hardened layer depth based on wavelet transform theory, Proc. Int. Conf. Video Image Process. (2017), pp. 39–43.10.1145/3177404.3177437 ↗
9. Salchak, Y.A., Sednev, D.A., Kroening, M., et al., Method of case hardening depth testing by using multifunctional ultrasonic testing instrument, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2015, vol. 81, p. 012080.10.1088/1757-899X/81/1/012080 ↗
10. Kobelco, SH-67 Measuring the induction hardened layer depth without cutting products, 2024. [Online]. Available at https://www.sisco.kobelco.com/english/service/product/. Accessed March 10, 2024.
11. Q-NET, Hardness Depth Tester P3123, 2024. [Online]. Available at https://q-net.de/hardness-depth-tester/. Accessed March 10, 2024.
12. Graja, P. and Meyendorf, N., Determination of the case depth by ultrasonic backscatter of case and induction hardened steel with a soft hardness gradient, Proc. ASME 2021 Quant. Nondestr. Eval. Conf. (2021), vol. 85529, p. V001T19A001.10.1115/QNDE2021-74995 ↗
13. Schneider, D., Hofmann, R., Schwarz, T., et al., Evaluating surface hardened steels by laser-acoustics, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2012, vol. 206, nos. 8–9, pp. 2079–2088.10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.09.017 ↗
14. Zhang, H., Zhu, M., Ji, S., et al., Numerical simulation and experimental study on laser hardening process of the 42CrMo4 steel, Adv. Mech. Eng., 2021, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 16878140211044649.10.1177/16878140211044649 ↗
15. Wang, G., Sang, X., Zhang, Y., et al., Carburization-induced microstructure evolution and hardening mechanism of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2023, vol. 25, pp. 1649–1661.10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.050 ↗
16. Baqeri, R., Honarvar, F., and Mehdizad, R., Case depth profile measurement of hardened components using ultrasonic backscattering method, Proc. 18th World Conf. Nondestr. Test. (Durban, South Africa, 2012), pp. 16–20.
17. Zhuo, H., Research on ultrasonic detection technology for the hardened layer morphology of alloy steel, PhD Dissertation, Changchun: Jilin Univ., 2024.
18. Amberg, TSP 203 Field Operation & Data Acquisition Manual, Ver. 2.4, 2005.
19. Dickmann, T. and Sander, B., Drivage concurrent tunnel seismic prediction, Felsbau-Rock Soil Eng., 1996, vol. 14, no. 5.
20. 20. TSP-Evaluation-Manual, Processing & Evaluation Software Manual, Ver. 1.1, 2005.
21. Sollid, A., Ekren, B.O., and Arntsen, B., Prestack time migration applied to marine P-SV seismic waves, SEG Tech. Program Expand. Abstr., 1996, pp. 1571–1574.10.1190/1.1826421 ↗
22. Reiche, S. and Berkels, B., Automated stacking of seismic reflection data based on nonrigid image matching, Geophysics, 2018, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. V171–V183.10.1190/geo2017-0189.1 ↗
23. Garcia, D. and Tarnec, L., Stolt’s f–k migration for plane wave ultrasound imaging, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 2013, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1853–1867.10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2771 ↗
24. Rao, J., Saini, A., Yang, J., et al., Ultrasonic imaging of irregularly shaped notches based on elastic reverse time migration, NDT & E Int., 2019, vol. 107, p. 102135.10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102135 ↗
25. Beniwal, S. and Ganguli, A., Defect detection around rebars in concrete using focused ultrasound and reverse time migration, Ultrasonics, 2015, vol. 62, pp. 112–125.10.1016/j.ultras.2015.05.008 ↗
26. Liu, H., Xia, H., Zhuang, M., et al., Reverse time migration of acoustic waves for imaging based defects detection for concrete and CFST structures, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2019, vol. 117, pp. 210–220.10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.011 ↗
27. Berryhill, J.R., Wave-equation datuming, Geophysics, 1979, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1329–1344.10.1190/1.1441010 ↗
28. Navarrete, M.A.B., Breul, P., and Gourvès, R., Application of wave equation theory to improve dynamic cone penetration test for shallow soil characterisation, J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 289–302.10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.07.004 ↗
29. Li, C., Deng, S., Yu, M., et al., Experimental investigation and performance characterization of laser quenching on 40Cr steel by disc laser with various overlap ratios, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2024, vol. 125, suppl. 1, pp. S148–S160.10.1134/S0031918X23601269 ↗
30. Lin, L., Zhang, W., Ma, Z., et al., Porosity estimation of abradable seal coating with an optimized support vector regression model based on multi-scale ultrasonic attenuation coefficient, NDT & E Int., 2020, vol. 113, p. 102272.10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102272 ↗
31. Malambo, L., Popescu, S., and Liu, M., Landsat-scale regional forest canopy height mapping using ICESat-2 along-track heights: Case study of eastern Texas, Remote Sens., 2022, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1.10.3390/rs15010001 ↗