Model Test Study on Oil Leakage and Underground Pipelines Using Ground Penetrating Radar
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The underground pipelines have frequent ruptures and leakage problems in the urban area, the distribution of contaminated soil is difficult to monitor and evaluate. It is important that the effective identification and assessment of underground pipelines and contaminated soil. The ground penetrating radar was applied to the detection of underground pipelines and contaminated soil using the electromagnetic wave propagation. The detection tests were carried out on pipes and leaking oil with different sizes, materials and buried depths in a transparent model tank developed by ourselves. The radar signal is processed by using GRED HD software, the single-channel waveform of underground pipelines and contaminated soil are obtained. The time-domain finite difference method is used to analyze the non-stationary signals of ground penetrating radar. The radar signals of underground pipelines with different characteristics and the variation of leakage oil are discussed. The radar interpretation accuracy of underground pipelines and contaminated soil is improved. It will provide the reference for related studies in future.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Shirokov, V.S., Soil and traffic loads on underground pipelines, Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 2018, vol. 55, pp. 115–119.10.1007/s11204-018-9512-6 ↗
2. Shin, S., Lee, G., Ahmed, U., Lee, Y., Na, J., and Han, C., Risk based underground pipeline safety management considering corrosion effect, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, vol. 342, pp. 279–289.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.029 ↗
3. Shou, K.J. and Chen, B.C., Numerical analysis of the mechanical behaviors of pressurized underground pipelines rehabilitated by cured in place pipe method, Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 2018, vol. 71, pp. 544–554.10.1016/j.tust.2017.11.005 ↗
4. Li, W., Han, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, C.R., Ren, Y.B., Wang, Y.J., and Chen, G., Real time location based rendering of urban underground pipelines, Int.J. Geo-Inf., 2018, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 32.
5. Rashidov, T.R. and An, E.V., Geometrically nonlinear buckling stability analysis of axially loaded underground pipelines, Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 2017, vol. 54, pp. 76–80.10.1007/s11204-017-9437-5 ↗
6. Duru, C. and Ani, C., A statistical analysis on the leak detection performance of underground and overground pipelines with wireless sensor networks through the maximum likelihood ratio test, Sadhana Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., 2017, vol. 42, pp. 1889–1899.
7. Bors, A.M., Butoi, N., Caramitu, A.R., Marinescu, V., and Lingvay, I., The thermooxidation and resistance to moulds action of some polyethylene sorts used at anticorrosive insulation of the underground pipelines, Mater. Plast., 2017, vol. 54, pp. 447–452.10.37358/MP.17.3.4869 ↗
8. Amaya Gomez, R., Ramirez Camacho, J.G., Pastor, E., Casal, J., and Munoz, F., Crater formation by the rupture of underground natural gas pipelines: A probabilistic based model, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2018, vol. 54, 224–239.10.1016/j.jngse.2018.03.011 ↗
9. Gadala, I.M., Wahab, M.A., and Alfantazi, A., Electrochemical corrosion finite element analysis and burst pressure prediction of externally corroded underground gas transmission pipelines, J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Trans. ASME, 2018, vol. 1401, no. 1, p. 011701.10.1115/1.4038224 ↗
10. Gunduz, M. and Naser, A.F., Cost based value stream mapping as a sustainable construction tool for underground pipeline construction projects, Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9(12), p. 2184.10.3390/su9122184 ↗
11. Kim, H.M. and Park, G.S., A new sensitive excitation technique in nondestructive inspection for underground pipelines by using differential coils,IEEE Trans. Magn., 2017, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 1–4, article ID 6202604.10.1109/TMAG.2017.2713042 ↗
12. Dzhala, RM., Verbenets, B.Y., Mel’nyk, M.I., Mytsyk, A.B., Savula, R.S., and Semenyuk, O.M., New methods for the corrosion monitoring of underground pipelines according to the measurements of currents and potentials, Mater. Sci., 2017, vol. 52, pp. 732–741.10.1007/s11003-017-0016-8 ↗
13. Israilov, M.S., Mardonov, B., and Rashidov, T.R., Seismodynamics of an underground pipeline in nonideal contact with soil: Effect of sliding on dynamic stresses, J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys., 2016, vol. 57, pp. 1126–1132.10.1134/S0021894416060213 ↗
14. Dimov, LA. and Dimov, I.L., New way of determining soil resistance to underground pipeline deformation, Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 2016, vol. 53, pp. 312–31610.1007/s11204-016-9404-6 ↗
15. Sahraoui, Y. and Chateauneuf, A., The effects of spatial variability of the aggressiveness of soil on system reliability of corroding underground pipelines, Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 2016, vol. 146, pp. 188–197.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.09.004 ↗
16. Ha, H.M. and Alfantazi, A., On the role of water, temperature, and glass transition in the corrosion protection behavior of epoxy coatings for underground pipelines, J. Coatings Technol. Res., 2015, vol. 12, pp. 1095–1110.10.1007/s11998-015-9705-0 ↗
17. Khan, L.R. and Tee, K.F., Quantification and comparison of carbon emissions for flexible underground pipelines, Can. J. Civ. Eng., 2015, vol. 42, pp. 728–736.10.1139/cjce-2015-0156 ↗
18. Matvienko, A.F., Korzunin, G.S., Loskutov, V.E., and Babkin, S.A., The quality control of underground gas pipelines via the electromagnetic and acoustic method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, pp. 546–553.10.1134/S1061830915090077 ↗
19. Guo, Z.Y., Liu, D.J., Pan, Q., Zhang, Y.Y., Li, Y., and Wang, Z., Vertical magnetic field and its analytic signal applicability in oil field underground pipeline detection, J. Geophys. Eng., 2015, vol. 12, pp. 340–350.10.1088/1742-2132/12/3/340 ↗
20. Klesk, P., Kapruziak, M., and Olech, B., Statistical moments calculated via integral images in application to landmine detection, Pattern Anal. Appl., 2018, vol. 21, pp. 671–684.10.1007/s10044-016-0592-5 ↗
21. Sun, H., Pashoutani, S., and Zhu, J., Nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with automated acoustic scanning system and ground penetrating radar, Sensors, 2018, vol. 18, p. 1955.10.3390/s18061955 ↗
22. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., and Duong, T.H., An algorithm for automatic localization and detection of rebars from GPR data of concrete bridge decks, Autom. Constr., 2018, vol. 89, pp. 292–298.10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.017 ↗
23. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., and Kim, J., Method for attenuation assessment of GPR data from concrete bridge decks, NDT & E Int., 2017, vol. 92, pp. 50–58.10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.016 ↗
24. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., and Kim, J., Understanding depth–amplitude effects in assessment of GPR data from concrete bridge decks, NDT & E Int., 2016, vol. 83, pp. 45–58.10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.004 ↗
25. Gucunski, N., Pailes, B., and Kim, J., Capture and quantification of deterioration progression in concrete bridge decks through periodical NDE surveys, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 2017, vol. 23, no. 1.10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000321 ↗
26. Romero, F.A., Barnes, C.L., and Azari, H., Validation of benefits of automated depth correction method: improving accuracy of ground–penetrating radar deck deterioration maps, Transp. Res. Board., 2015, vol. 1.10.3141/2522-10 ↗
27. Ukaegbu, I.K. and Gamage, K.A.A., Ground penetrating radar as a contextual sensor for multi-sensor radiological characterization, Sensors, 2017, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 790.10.3390/s17040790 ↗