journal article·2020-10

Production of Ultrasonic Test Piece by Utilization of Additive Manufacturing Technique

M. Riahi, H. R. Javidrad

Publisher page

Abstract

Test pieces are principal elements in the utilization of ultrasonic testing equipment. This is particularly evident when testing takes place for parts produced by additive manufacturing (AM) processes. In light of common defects in these types of parts, e.g. gas and powder cavities, lack of fusion, etc., as well as differences in the forming mechanism compared to parts produced via conventional methods, the existing test pieces are not responsive to the required scrutiny needed for the procedure. In this paper, the overall procedure for the manufacturing of a test block by additive manufacturing selective laser melting (SLM) process is presented. Cross-cutting of the manufactured part took place followed by measuring embedded defects’ characteristics by microscope. In addition, the distance of defects from the outer surfaces was also measured by a micrometer. The produced data was indicative of affirmation of findings in terms of dimensional precision and accuracy. As a result, the manufactured test block was found to be reliable and acceptable.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Cerniglia, D., Scafidi, M., Pantano, A., and Rudlin, J., Inspection of additive-manufactured layered components, Ultrasonics, 2015, vol. 62, pp. 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2015.06.00110.1016/j.ultras.2015.06.001 ↗
2. Mahmoud, D. and Elbestawi, M.A., Selective laser melting of porosity graded lattice structures for bone implants, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2019, vol. 100, nos. 9–12, pp. 2915–2927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2886-910.1007/s00170-018-2886-9 ↗
3. Koester, L., Roberts, R.A., Barnard, D.J., Chakrapani, S., Singh, S., Hogan, R., and Bond, L.J., NDE of additively manufactured components with embedded defects (reference standards) using conventional and advanced ultrasonic methods, 43rd Annu. Rev. Progr. Quant. Nondestr. Eval. 36, 2017.10.1063/1.4974721 ↗
4. Kim, F.H., Villarraga-Gómez, H., and Moylan, S.P., Inspection of embedded internal features in additively manufactured metal parts using metrological x-ray computed tomography, ASPE/euspen, 2016, pp. 191–195.
5. Du, W., Bai, Q., Wang, Y., and Zhang, B., Eddy current detection of subsurface defects for additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing., Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2018, vol. 95, nos. 9–12, pp. 3185–3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1354-210.1007/s00170-017-1354-2 ↗
6. Javidrad, H.R. and Salemi, S., Determination of elastic constants of additive manufactured Inconel 625 parts by means of ultrasonic technique, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2020, vol. 107, pp. 4597–4607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05321-x10.1007/s00170-020-05321-x ↗
7. Aleshin, N.P., Grigor’ev, M.V., Shchipakov, N.A., Krys’ko, N.V., Krasnov, I.S., Prilutskii, M.A., and Smorodinskii, Ya.G., On the possibility of using ultrasonic surface and head waves in nondestructive quality checks of additive manufactured products, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2017, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091712002610.1134/S1061830917120026 ↗
8. Lopez, A., Bacelar, R., Piresa, I., Santos, T.G., Sousa, J.P., and Quintino, L., Non-destructive testing application of radiography and ultrasound for wire and arc additive manufacturing, Addit. Manuf., 2018, vol. 21, pp. 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.02010.1016/j.addma.2018.03.020 ↗
9. Aleshin, N.P., Murashov, V.V., Shchipakov, N.A., Krasnov, I.S., and Lozhkova, D.S., Experimental research into possibilities and peculiarities of ultrasonic testing of additive manufactured parts, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2016, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091612002010.1134/S1061830916120020 ↗
10. Yang, P.H., Gao, X.X., Liang, J., Shi, Y.W., and Xu, N., Nondestructive testing of defects in additive manufacturing titanium alloy components, 15th Asia-Pac. Conf. Nondestr. Test. (APCNDT2017), Singapore.
11. Everton, S.K., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., and Dutton, B., Identification of sub-surface defects in parts produced by additive manufacturing, using laser generated ultrasound, in Mater. Sci. & Technol., 2019.
12. Everton, S., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., and Dutton, B., Using laser ultrasound to detect subsurface defects in metal laser powder bed fusion components, JOM, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2661-710.1007/s11837-017-2661-7 ↗
13. Everton, S.K., Dickens, P., Tuck, C., and Dutton, B., Evaluation of laser ultrasonic testing for inspection of metal additive manufacturing, Proc. SPIE, 2015, vol. 9353. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.207876810.1117/12.2078768 ↗
14. Jansson, A., Zekavat, A.R., and Pejryd, L., Measurement of internal features in additive manufactured components by the use of computed tomography, Int. Symp. Digital Ind. Radiol. Comput. Tomogr., 2015.
15. Dayal, V., Benedict, Z.G., Bhatnagar, N., and Harper, A.G., Development of composite calibration standard for quantitative NDE by ultrasound and thermography, AIP Conf. Proc., 2018, vol. 1949, no. 1, pp. 060006-1–060006-7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.503155210.1063/1.5031552 ↗
16. Koester, L.W., Taheri, H., Bigelow, T.A., Collins, P.C., and Bond, L.J., Nondestructive testing for metal parts fabricated using powder-based additive manufacturing, Mater Eval., 2018, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 514–524. http://works.bepress.com/timothy_bigelow/23/
17. ASTM E1158-04, Standard Guide for Material Selection and Fabrication of Reference Blocks for the Pulsed Longitudinal Wave Ultrasonic Examination of Metal and Metal Alloy Production Material, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Int., 2004. www.astm.org, https://doi.org/10.1520/E1158-0410.1520/E1158-04 ↗
18. Tawfik, A., Bills, P., Blunt, L., and Racasan, R., Development of an artefact to detect unfused powder in additive manufactured components using X-ray CT, 8th Conf. Ind. Comput. Tomogr., Wels, Austria (iCT 2018), 2018.
19. ASME Section VIII-Division 1: Example Problem Manual. https://www.asme.org/products/codes-standards/ ptb4-2013-section-viiidivisioin-1-example-problem.
20. Fazarinc, M., Muhič, T., Kugler, G., and Terčelj, M., Thermal fatigue properties of differently constructed functionally graded materials aimed for refurbishing of pressure-die-casting dies, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2012, vol. 25, pp. 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.01610.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.05.016 ↗
21. Ali, H., Ghadbeigi, H., and Mumtaz, K., Effect of scanning strategies on residual stress and mechanical properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2018, vol. 712, pp. 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.10310.1016/j.msea.2017.11.103 ↗
22. Ushakov, V.M. and Davydov, D.M., Calibration blocks for ultrasonic nondestructive testing, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2006, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183090603001610.1134/S1061830906030016 ↗
23. Alafaghani. A., Qattawi, A., and Castañón, M.A.G.,Effect of manufacturing parameters on the microstructure and mechanical properties of metal laser sintering parts of precipitate hardenable metals, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 2018, vol. 99, nos. 9—12, pp. 2491–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2586-510.1007/s00170-018-2586-5 ↗
24. ISO 19675:2017. Non-destructive testing—Ultrasonic testing—Specification for a calibration block for phased array testing (PAUT), Int. Organ. Stand., 2017.
25. Qiu, C., Adkins, N.J.E., and Attallah, M.M., Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Ti–6Al–4V, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, vol. 578, pp. 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.09910.1016/j.msea.2013.04.099 ↗
26. Hiller, J. and Hornberger, P., Measurement accuracy in X-ray computed tomography metrology: Toward a systematic analysis of interference effects in tomographic imaging, Precis. Eng., 2016, vol. 45, pp. 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.12.00310.1016/j.precisioneng.2015.12.003 ↗
27. ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code on Nondestructive Testing, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., July 2015, Sec. V, Art. 4.