journal article·2017-01

Generalized coefficients for measuring mechanical stresses in carbon and low-alloyed steels by the acoustoelasticity method

A. V. Kamyshev, S. V. Makarov, L. A. Pasmanik, V. A. Smirnov, V. S. Modestov, A. V. Pivkov

Publisher page

Abstract

It is shown that the microscopic material structure significantly affects the results of measuring mechanical stresses by the acoustoelasticity method. It is noted that the nonequiaxedness of the grain metal structure in steel flats leads to both the emergence of intrinsic acoustic anisotropy and the anisotropy of elastoacoustic coupling coefficients (EACC). Results of the research into connection between EACC and intrinsic acoustic anisotropy are presented for carbon and low-alloyed steels. The possibility of using generalized EACC values for determining mechanical stresses in high–acoustic-anisotropy materials of this class is substantiated. The results have made it possible to develop a mechanical-stress measurement technique that allows one to take measurements without running calibration tests on representative specimens of the test object.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Material Properties and Applications · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (7)

Show source-provided references
1. STO (Gazprom Standard) 2-2.3-327-2009: Assessing Stressedly Deformed State of Technological Pipelines of Compressor Stations, 2009.
2. Nikitina, N.E., Akustouprugost’. Opyt prakticheskogo primeneniya (Acoustoelasticity: Practical Application Experience), Nizhny Novgorod: TALAM, 2005.
3. Nikitina, N.E., Kamyshev, A.V., and Kazachek, S.V., Application of the acoustoelasticity phenomenon in studying stress states in technological pipelines, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 171–178.10.1134/S1061830915030079 ↗
4. Johnson, G.C., The effect of texture on acoustoelasticity, in Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983, vol. 2A, pp. 1295–1308.10.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_84 ↗
5. Kamyshev, A.V., Pasmanik, L.A., Smirnov, V.A., Modestov, V.S., and Pivkov, A.V., Assessing stressedly deformed state of USKP under thermal loading of PGV-1000 steam generators by a design–instrumental method with determining force boundary conditions by the acoustoelasticity method, Proc. IX Int. Sci.-Tech. Conf. “Ensuring the Safety of LWR Nuclear Power Plants”, Podolsk, 2015.
6. Uglov, A.L. and Khlybov, A.A., On the inspection of the stressed state of anisotropic steel pipelines using the acoustoelasticity method, Russ. J. Nondestr. Test., 2015, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 210–216.10.1134/S1061830915040087 ↗
7. FR 1.28.2013.13885: Elementy konstruktsionnye magistral'nykh gazoprovodov. Metodika izmerenii mekhanicheskikh napryazhenii metodom akustouprugosti (FR 1.28.2013.13885: Constructional Materials of Main Gas Pipelines. A Technique of Stress Measurement by the Acoustoelasticity Method), Nizhny Novgorod: Inkotes, 2011.