journal article·2026-06-15

Optimisation of the regeneration parameters of colza oil residue regenerated SBS modified bitumen using response surface methodology and its multiscale characterisation

Chenghao Liang, Changjun Sun, Qishi Li, Xiuxi Liu, Panfeng Du, Henglong Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimise the design and predict the physical properties of colza oil residue (COR) regenerated SBS modified bitumen based on regeneration preparation parameters and COR content. A total of 27 experiments were conducted using the Box–Behnken design, and a quadratic regression model was applied to evaluate all responses under the global optimal conditions. Numerical optimisation determined the optimal regeneration design for SBS modified bitumen, including a shear time of 17.7 min, a shear temperature of 150°C, a shear speed of 1050 rpm, and a maximum COR content of 8%, achieving a comprehensive desirability of 69.2%. COR can not only restore the flexibility of bitumen, but also improve its heat recovery ability at low temperatures. Moreover, COR improves the flowability of bitumen by introducing fatty acid esters, but does not trigger significant chemical reactions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Petroleum Processing and Analysis · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hunan University

Hunan Provincial Engineering Research Center for construction solid wastes recycling

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · Project of Yuelushan Center for Industrial Innovation · The science and technology Program of Hunan Provincial Department of Transportation

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11698510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116985 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0207310.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02073 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11935710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119357 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.11069110.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.09.00210.1016/j.buildenv.2004.09.002 ↗
7. 10.3390/su1504380710.3390/su15043807 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12844110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128441 ↗
9. 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.000076510.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000765 ↗
10. Golchin, B., & Mansourian, A. (2017). Evaluation of fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt using response surface method. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 4(4), 335–350.
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.025 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11883710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118837 ↗
13. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000129210.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001292 ↗
14. 10.1080/14680629.2015.106670410.1080/14680629.2015.1066704 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12213810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122138 ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2025.246557810.1080/14680629.2025.2465578 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0268510.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02685 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12070110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120701 ↗
19. 10.3141/2371-0710.3141/2371-07 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15448910.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154489 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2020.182634410.1080/14680629.2020.1826344 ↗
22. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000071310.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000713 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13325710.1016/j.fuel.2024.133257 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.10010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.100 ↗
25. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0703510.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07035 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12384910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123849 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.03210.1016/j.psep.2021.01.032 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2022.206012610.1080/14680629.2022.2060126 ↗