journal article·2026-06-09

A trade-off between rock crushing and enhanced performance of concrete roads based on life cycle assessment and cost analysis

Abhinav Kumar Thakur, Chintada Chandrasekhar, Rebekka Benjaminselvaraj, Surender Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

While the role of aggregate angularity in the asphalt concrete is well understood, the same is not established for paving concrete mixes. This study evaluates the mechanical, structural and environmental trade-offs associated with aggregate angularity in rigid pavements. Aggregates with angularities (round, sub-angular and angular) maintaining similar sphericity and surface texture were used in two paving concrete mixes (water-to-binder ratios of 0.36 and 0.45). Mechanical properties, porosity and resulting pavement slab thicknesses were assessed for traffic levels ranging from 1,000 to 10,000 commercial vehicles/day and linked to embodied energy and emissions through a cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment. Higher angularity improved flexural strength and modulus, enabling slab thickness reduction of approximately 15 to 20 mm. Although additional crushing increased emissions, reduced concrete volume resulted in net energy and CO2 reductions of 3-11% per km. A scenario incorporating crusher fines further improved material efficiency, reduced environmental impacts and decreased sensitivity to transportation distance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Life Cycle Costing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board · Department of Science and Technology

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1617/s11527-015-0522-910.1617/s11527-015-0522-9 ↗
2. 10.1201/978148226464710.1201/9781482264647 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13413110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134131 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.013 ↗
5. ASTM C39. (2024). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM.
6. ASTM C469. (2022). Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and poisson ‘ s ratio of concrete. ASTM International.
7. ASTM C78. (2022). Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading). ASTM International.
8. 10.3390/su1715672310.3390/su17156723 ↗
9. Ballim, Y., & Alexander, M. G. (2018). Guiding principles in developing the South African approach to durability index testing of concrete. 6th International Conference on Durability of Concrete Structures, ICDCS 2018, 36–45.
10. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0075010.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00750 ↗
11. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000118110.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001181 ↗
12. 10.1002/nag.332910.1002/nag.3329 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13294110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132941 ↗
14. Cheung Chan A. W. (2007). Economic and environmental evaluations of life cycle cost analysis practice: A case study of Michigan DOT pavement projects. Master of science thesis dissertation in the natural resource and environment University of Michigan (Issue March).
15. 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591)10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591) ↗
16. Claisse P. A. (2014). Transport properties of concrete: Measurements and applications.
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13441510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134415 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13762910.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137629 ↗
19. De Larrard, F. (1999). Concrete mixture proportioning: A scientifil approach (Modern Concrete Technology Series). Modern Concrete Technology (Vol. 9).10.1201/9781482272055 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10540810.1016/j.jobe.2022.105408 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0373510.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03735 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.dibe.2025.10070410.1016/j.dibe.2025.100704 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0459510.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04595 ↗
24. Gates L. Masad E. Pyle R. & Bushee D. (2011). Aggregate image measurement system (AIMS 2): Final Report (Issue January).
25. Government of India. (2024). Energy statistics India 2024. Implementation, Ministry of Statistics and Programme. https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/EnergyStatistics_India_publication_2024N_0.pdf
26. Hammond G. & Jones C. (2008). Inventory of carbon & energy (ICE).
27. 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.11000810.1016/j.engappai.2025.110008 ↗
28. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000284910.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002849 ↗
29. Huang Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design.
30. India GHG Program. (2015). India specific road transport emission factors.
31. International Finance Corporation. (2017). India construction materials database of embodied energy and global warming potential. https://edgebuildings.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/IFC-India-Construction-Materials-Database-Methodology-Report.pdf
32. IRC: 44. (2017). Guidelines for cement concrete mix design for pavements.
33. IRC:58. (2015). Guidelines for the design of plain jointed rigid pavements of highways. https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/irc/irc.gov.in.058.2015.pdf
34. IS:15770. (2008). Light Diesel Oil-Specification.
35. IS in 516 (Part 2/Sec 3) : 2020. (2022). Hardened concrete - methods of test (oxygen permeability index). Bureau of Indian Satandards. www.standardsbis
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.13510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.135 ↗
37. 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:6(614)10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2004)16:6(614) ↗
38. Khataei, B., Ahmadi, M., & Kioumarsi, M. (2024). Environmental assessment of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete containing class-f fly ash. In M. Kioumarsi & B. Shafei (Eds.), The 1st international conference on net-zero built environment: Innovations in materials, structures, and management practices (NETZ) (pp. 377–383). Springer Nature.
39. Kim Y. & Souza L. T. (2009). Effects of aggregate angularity on mix design characteristics and pavement performance. In Mpm-10. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/25454
40. Korre A. & Durucan S. (2009). Life cycle assessment of aggregates. In WRAP Issue August.
41. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10578810.1016/j.jobe.2022.105788 ↗
42. 10.1007/s11356-024-33868-910.1007/s11356-024-33868-9 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.062 ↗
44. Liu Y. Nair H. Lane D. S. Wang L. & Sun W. (2019). Influence of aggregate morphology and grading on the performance of 9.5-mm stone matrix asphalt mixtures. http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/19-r15.pdf
45. Loijos A. (2005). Life cycle assessment of concrete pavements: Impacts and opportunities.
46. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.08.02810.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.08.028 ↗
47. 10.1080/14680629.2007.969007710.1080/14680629.2007.9690077 ↗
48. Mehta, P. K. PD, & Monteiro, P. J. PD (2006). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials (Third Edition). McGraw-Hill.
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12359910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123599 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.clema.2022.10013810.1016/j.clema.2022.100138 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.069 ↗
52. Ochsendorf J. Norford L. K. Brown D. Durschlag H. Hsu S. L. Love A. Santero N. Swei O. Webb A. & Wildnauer M. (2011). Methods impacts and opportunities in the concrete building life cycle. Research report R11-01 concrete and sustainability hub department of civil and environmental engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology August 119. http://www.greenconcrete.info/downloads/MITBuildingsLCAreport.pdf
53. 10.1177/036119810619520010210.1177/0361198106195200102 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.00110.1016/j.envdev.2014.04.001 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000187410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001874 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.058 ↗
57. 10.1177/0361198122112521210.1177/03611981221125212 ↗
58. 10.3141/1787-1310.3141/1787-13 ↗
59. Rate Analysis Report. (2023). Public works department (Issue 1).
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.075 ↗
61. 10.1080/14680629.2011.65008810.1080/14680629.2011.650088 ↗
62. 10.1080/10298436.2011.63579210.1080/10298436.2011.635792 ↗
63. Standard Schedule of Rates. (2023). Public works department. https://indiaai.gov.in/government/government-of-tamil-nadu.
64. Strzałkowski J. (2020). Materials the effect of aggregate shape on the properties of concretes with silica fume.10.3390/ma13122780 ↗
65. 10.3390/ma1605208010.3390/ma16052080 ↗
66. TERI. (2014). Commercial energy balance tables and conversion factors. Energy and Environment Data Directory.
67. User Guide. (2023). CO2 baseline database for the Indian power sector. In Ministry of Power Central Electricity Authority (Issue December). https://cea.nic.in/wp-content/uploads/baseline/2020/07/user_guide_ver14.pdf
68. 10.3390/MA1308187610.3390/MA13081876 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.01.00310.1016/j.jtte.2019.01.003 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.01.00310.1016/j.jtte.2019.01.003 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.10846010.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108460 ↗