Multi-scale characterisation of composite crumb rubber – nano silica modified porous asphalt for improved functional performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous asphalt concrete (PAC) provides effective surface drainage but remains susceptible to raveling, cracking, and moisture–induced deterioration due to its highly open structure. This study investigated whether the combined incorporation of crumb rubber (CR) and nano silica (NS) could improve PAC durability while maintaining drainage performance. A multi–scale experimental program was conducted using CR (0–10%) and NS (0–6%) at both binder and mixture levels. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed that NS enhanced network densification through intensified Si–O–Si vibrational features, whereas CR exhibited minimal spectral changes, indicating physical swelling rather than chemical bonding. These interaction mechanisms were reflected in the performance results. Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) testing showed a reduction of more than 40% in non–recoverable creep compliance, indicating improved rutting resistance. NS increased Marshall stability by up to 22.9%, while CR more effectively reduced abrasion, lowering Cantabro loss by approximately 9%. However, NS contents above 4% reduced permeability and accelerated clogging, indicating a trade–off between durability and drainage performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Universitas Diponegoro
University of Hertfordshire
IPB University
Ghent University
Polytechnic of Public Works
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Funding
Diponegoro University
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2009). Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0059110.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00591 ↗
3. Al-Akhshar A. M. Masri K. A. Ramadhansyah P. J. Norhidayah A. H. Mohd Warid M. N. & Yaacob H. (2021). Resilient modulus prediction of nano-silica modified porous asphalt using Finite Element Analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 682(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/682/1/01206010.1088/1755-1315/682/1/012060 ↗
4. 10.3390/app1410399810.3390/app14103998 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1717427910.3390/ma17174279 ↗
6. AL-Qudah A. H. Rahim M. A. Ghazaly Z. M. Mashaan N. S. Koting S. Napiah M. Wan Omar W. M. S. & Issa Y. (2018). Effect of aged crumb rubber bitumen on performance dense graded mix in Malaysia. Available at SSRN 5224020.
7. 10.1007/s44290-025-00196-x10.1007/s44290-025-00196-x ↗
8. Amjadian, Y., Ziari, H., Sharifi Moghaddam Kakhki, S. M., Abbaspoor, A., & Hajiloo, M. (2022). Evaluating the efficiency of SMA mixtures containing crumb rubber and WMA additives. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 148(2), 04022013.
9. Arshad, A. K., Ahmad, J., & Masri, K. A. (2019). Rutting resistance of nanosilica modified porous asphalt. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 10(1), 2274–2284. http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp2274 http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=10&IType=1 http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=10&IType=1.
10. 10.1007/s40996-023-01196-610.1007/s40996-023-01196-6 ↗
11. Azman Masri, K., Kamil Arshad, A., & Saifullah Samsudin, M. (2016). Mechanical properties of porous asphalt with nanosilica modified binder. Jurnal Teknologi, 78, 2180–3722. www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my.
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.14567410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145674 ↗
13. 10.1080/1029843070179212810.1080/10298430701792128 ↗
14. 10.1155/2013/78961210.1155/2013/789612 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12205410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122054 ↗
16. 10.1177/036119811875805110.1177/0361198118758051 ↗
17. Cooley, L. A., Brumfield, J. W., Mallick, R. B., Mogawer, W. S., Partl, M., Poulikakos, L., & Hicks, G. (2009). Construction and maintenance practices for permeable friction courses (Vol. 640). Transportation Research Board.
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.052 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.10557410.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105574 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000142310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001423 ↗
21. 10.3141/1681-0610.3141/1681-06 ↗
22. 10.1007/s41062-024-01590-710.1007/s41062-024-01590-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12158210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121582 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12579110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125791 ↗
25. 10.3141/2295-0810.3141/2295-08 ↗
26. 10.3390/buildings1309235210.3390/buildings13092352 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14016310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140163 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jtte.2024.04.00510.1016/j.jtte.2024.04.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12725310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127253 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.014 ↗
31. Maruto. (1987). MarutoAF-16 asphalt permeability apparatus, instruction manual. Instruction Manua.
32. Masri, K. A., Jaya, R. P., Choo, C. S., & Ibrahim, M. H. W. (2022). Prediction of rutting resistance of porous asphalt mixture incorporating nanosilica. In T. Roshni, P. Samui, D. T. Bui, D. Kim, & R. Khatibi (Eds.), Risk, reliability and sustainable remediation in the field of civil and environmental engineering (pp. 477–486). Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-323-85698-0.00018-6 ↗
33. 10.3390/app1011388710.3390/app10113887 ↗
34. Mehraj T. Mir M. S. & Mohanty B. (2022). Rheological investigation of soft grade asphalt binder modified with crumb rubber-nanosilica composite. In International Conference on Transportation Planning and Implementation Methodologies for Developing Countries (pp. 99–119). Springer.10.1007/978-981-99-6090-3_10 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-981-99-6090-3_1010.1007/978-981-99-6090-3_10 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.09810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.098 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.04610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.046 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.10690910.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106909 ↗
39. Nataadmadja A. D. & Anjani N. N. (2024). The Usage of Additives on Porous Asphalt. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012002.10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012002 ↗
40. 10.1007/s42947-020-0210-110.1007/s42947-020-0210-1 ↗
41. Ogundipe O. M. Aboloye O. C. & Fatuase S. O. (2020). Evaluation of the properties of asphalt concrete modified with crumb rubber using Marshall test. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements – Mairepav9 (pp. 469–478). Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-48679-2_44 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11857710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118577 ↗
43. 10.1155/2023/351752110.1155/2023/3517521 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.016 ↗
45. Radeef, H. R., Hassan, N. A., Abidin, A. R. Z., Mahmud, M. Z.H., Yaacob, H., Mashros, N., & Mohamed, A. (2021). Effect of aging and moisture damage on the cracking resistance of rubberized asphalt mixture. Materials Today: Proceedings, 42, 2853–2858.
46. 10.1007/s41062-025-01882-610.1007/s41062-025-01882-6 ↗
47. Ramdhani F. Subagio B. S. Rahman H. & Frazila R. B. (2024). Performance characteristics of micro rubber SIR 20 in asphalt mixtures. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 576 p. 06015). EDP Sciences.10.1051/e3sconf/202457606015 ↗
48. Ramroop, V., Leon, L., & Maharaj, C. (2025). Optimising crumb rubber integration in hot mix asphalt. Journal of Sustainability Research, 7(2), 1–21.
49. 10.21533/pen.v10i4.312610.21533/pen.v10i4.3126 ↗
50. Rasheed S. S. Joni H. H. & Al-Rubaee R. H. (2023). Using nano silica to improve asphalt mixture performance. In AIP Conference Proceedings. American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0140829.10.1063/5.0140829 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.016 ↗
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000217610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002176 ↗
53. 10.13189/cea.2025.13031510.13189/cea.2025.130315 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13657510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136575 ↗
55. Suwarto F. Kurnianto Y. F. Setiabudi B. & Sholeh M. N. (2021). Toll road maintenance towards minimum service standard. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. (012058). IOP Publishing10.1088/1755-1315/700/1/012058 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijtst.2025.06.00810.1016/j.ijtst.2025.06.008 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.18010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.180 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.treng.2022.10014510.1016/j.treng.2022.100145 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12705610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127056 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11830710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118307 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13401610.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134016 ↗
62. Watson D. Tran N. H. Rodezno C. Taylor A. J. & James T. J. (2018). NCHRP Report 877: Performance-Based Mix Design of Porous Friction Courses. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Washington DC.10.17226/25173 ↗
63. 10.3390/ma1807141910.3390/ma18071419 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12105810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121058 ↗
65. 10.1080/14680629.2024.236418710.1080/14680629.2024.2364187 ↗
66. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000069010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000690 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.00110.1016/j.jmrt.2018.07.001 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.070 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.014 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13207810.1016/j.fuel.2024.132078 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12137410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121374 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12061410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120614 ↗
73. 10.1016/S2095-7564(15)30087-810.1016/S2095-7564(15)30087-8 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13854310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138543 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e4143710.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41437 ↗