Beyond oxidation: a new framework for understanding and effective simulation of asphalt aging in the era of climate-adaptive pavements
Source abstract
Abstract
Asphalt aging has become a climate-sensitive infrastructure problem, shaped by combined thermal, UV, moisture, and oxidative stressors. This review draws on more than 80 years of laboratory aging research and critically examines legacy protocols and newer multi-stressor simulations, focusing on the aging pathways they trigger and the aging states they produce. An aging triad is proposed as a guiding structure that links environmental stressors, material composition, and dominant physico-chemical mechanisms. It explains why outcomes from different methods are often not equivalent across climates or binder classes. Aging issues are also summarized for non-standard materials, including polymer-modified binders, cold mixes and emulsions, and recycled-content systems, where classical protocols can introduce bias or fail to represent field processes. FA2MS is then presented as a literature-derived framework that accounts for climate, material type, objectives, and laboratory constraints when selecting protocols. Priority research needs are identified to improve comparability, standardization, and field representativeness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Victoria University
Charles Darwin University
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12610910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126109 ↗
2. 10.3390/su1410594210.3390/su14105942 ↗
3. 10.3390/infrastructures901000810.3390/infrastructures9010008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.07610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.076 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13267910.1016/j.fuel.2024.132679 ↗
6. 10.1080/10298436.2020.182338810.1080/10298436.2020.1823388 ↗
7. 10.1080/102984304200019856810.1080/1029843042000198568 ↗
8. 10.1520/JTE2012009310.1520/JTE20120093 ↗
9. 10.1080/14680629.2014.90719610.1080/14680629.2014.907196 ↗
10. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1977210.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-19772 ↗
11. 10.3390/su1413782710.3390/su14137827 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12578910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125789 ↗
13. 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-12-0910.28991/CEJ-2022-08-12-09 ↗
14. 10.1007/s42947-021-00003-710.1007/s42947-021-00003-7 ↗
15. 10.3390/app918373810.3390/app9183738 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13564510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135645 ↗
17. 10.3390/su1502090910.3390/su15020909 ↗
18. 10.1007/s41062-024-01704-110.1007/s41062-024-01704-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.038 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.11.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.11.005 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12151110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121511 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.v125.410.1002/app.v125.4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.08110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.081 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.000028310.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000283 ↗
25. 10.3390/jcs811044110.3390/jcs8110441 ↗
26. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158749610.1080/14680629.2019.1587496 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2021.198730310.1080/14680629.2021.1987303 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968996110.1080/14680629.2004.9689961 ↗
29. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1536910.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15369 ↗
30. 10.1002/pat.568210.1002/pat.5682 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.01010.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.010 ↗
32. 10.1177/036119812095419010.1177/0361198120954190 ↗
33. 10.1177/036119811875663110.1177/0361198118756631 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.04910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.049 ↗
35. Bennert T. & Cooley L. A. (2014). Evaluate the contribution of the mixture components on the longevity and performance of FC-5 (FINAL REPORT No. BDS15 977-01). Rutgers University Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT).
36. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1957610.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-19576 ↗
37. Bishara, S. W., Robertson, R. E., & Mahoney, D. (2000). Rapid oxidative aging of binder using microwave energy. An improved method. Proceedings of the papers submitted for review at 2nd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume congress, held 20–22 September 2000, Barcelona, Spain. Book 2–session 2. https://trid.trb.org/View/674008.
38. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.27310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.273 ↗
39. Bonaquist, R., & Anderson, D. A. (with Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, & Transportation Research Board). (2011). Investigation of short-term laboratory aging of neat and modified asphalt binders. National Academies Press.10.17226/14613 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13845210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138452 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.003 ↗
42. 10.3141/2444-1110.3141/2444-11 ↗
43. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1813910.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18139 ↗
44. 10.3390/ma1319443810.3390/ma13194438 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jtte.2021.06.00110.1016/j.jtte.2021.06.001 ↗
46. 10.3390/coatings1206075210.3390/coatings12060752 ↗
47. 10.3390/polym1414291610.3390/polym14142916 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.013 ↗
49. 10.1080/14680629.2021.190673510.1080/14680629.2021.1906735 ↗
50. Carter Alan Vasconcelos Kamilla & Dave Eshan (2024165 pp. 131–135.
51. 10.3390/su15131058310.3390/su151310583 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jreng.2024.04.00510.1016/j.jreng.2024.04.005 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0024110.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00241 ↗
54. 10.1080/14680629.2013.83783910.1080/14680629.2013.837839 ↗
55. 10.1080/14680629.2020.182635110.1080/14680629.2020.1826351 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.11940310.1016/j.fuel.2020.119403 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13057510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130575 ↗
58. Colin, X., Teyssedre, G., & Fois, M. (2011). Ageing and degradation of multiphase polymer systems. In A. Boudenne, L. Ibos, Y. Candau, & S. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of multiphase polymer systems (1st edn, pp. 797–841). Wiley.10.1002/9781119972020.ch21 ↗
59. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126675810.1080/14680629.2016.1266758 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13320310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133203 ↗
61. 10.1080/10298436.2018.150884510.1080/10298436.2018.1508845 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.12110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.121 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.treng.2020.10003010.1016/j.treng.2020.100030 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.05810.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.058 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.095 ↗
66. 10.3390/ma1602085310.3390/ma16020853 ↗
67. D6521 Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV). (n.d.). Retrieved 30 June 2025 from https://store.astm.org/d6521-22.html.
68. 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.01.00210.1016/j.jtte.2023.01.002 ↗
69. 10.1617/s11527-014-0385-510.1617/s11527-014-0385-5 ↗
70. Davis T. C. & Petersen J. C. (1967 February). An inverse GLC study of asphalts used in the Zaca-Wigmore experimental road test. Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol Proc. https://trid.trb.org/View/100868.
71. Davison R. Martin A. E. Chowdhury A. Han R. Prapaitrakul N. Jin X. Lawrence J. & Texas Transportation Institute (2009). Evaluation of binder aging and its influence in aging of hot mix asphalt concrete: Literature review and experimental design. (No. FHWA/TX-08/0-6009-1). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16861.
72. 10.3390/ma1622708110.3390/ma16227081 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.10314310.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103143 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13176310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131763 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12074410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120744 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13920910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139209 ↗
77. Edler A. C. Hattingh M. M. Servas V. P. & Marais C. P. (1985). Use of aging tests to determine the efficacy of hydrated lime additions to asphalt in retarding its oxidative hardening (with discussion). 54. https://trid.trb.org/View/575946.
78. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12890210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128902 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11933110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119331 ↗
80. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126674010.1080/14680629.2016.1266740 ↗
81. 10.3390/civileng403004910.3390/civileng4030049 ↗
82. EN 15323:2007 – Bitumen and bituminous binders – Accelerated long-term ageing/conditioning by the rotating cylinder method (RCAT). (2007). iTeh Standards. Retrieved 27 April 2024 from https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/ec71a2ec-13a9-40d0-b27f-a595b3970cbf/en-15323-2007.
83. 10.1080/10298436.2024.241408910.1080/10298436.2024.2414089 ↗
84. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000377010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003770 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13705010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137050 ↗
86. 10.1080/10298436.2018.143036510.1080/10298436.2018.1430365 ↗
87. Farrar M. Grimes R. W. Turner T. F. & Planche J. P. (2014). The Universal Simple Aging Test (USAT) and Low-Temperature Performance Grading Using Small-Plate Dynamic Shear Rheometry: An Alternative to Standard RTFO PAV and BBR for HMA and WMA (Technical White Paper No. FP 14). Western Research Institute.
88. Farrar, M. F., Grimes, R. W., Sui, C., Planche, J.-P., Huang, S. C., Turner, T. F., & Glaser, R. (2012, June 13). Thin film oxidative aging and Low temperature performance grading using small plate dynamic shear rheometry: An alternative to standard RTFO, PAV, AND BBR. 5th eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress, Istanbul.
89. 10.3141/2370-0910.3141/2370-09 ↗
90. Fedor G. R. & Brennan P. J. (1996). Comparison between natural weathering and fluorescent UV exposures: UVA-340 lamp test results (No. CONF-9601145-). Article CONF-9601145-. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/611617.10.1520/STP16154S ↗
91. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12574910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125749 ↗
92. Fernández-Gómez, W. D., Quintana, H. R., & Lizcano, F. R. (2013). A review of asphalt and asphalt mixture aging. Ingeniería e Investigación, 33(1), 5–12.10.15446/ing.investig.v33n1.37659 ↗
93. 10.1617/s11527-018-1270-410.1617/s11527-018-1270-4 ↗
94. Figueroa A. S. & Reyes F. A. (2016). Moisture damage analysis through the TSR and MIST test using water conditioning asphalt in: Proceedings of 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress. Presented at the 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress Czech Technical University in Prague. https://doi.org/10.14311/EE.2016.24710.14311/EE.2016.247 ↗
95. 10.1155/2018/246930710.1155/2018/2469307 ↗
96. Francis A. (2022). Q-Lab Leads Major Revision to ASTM G155. Retrieved 30 June 2025 from https://blog.q-lab.com/q-lab-leads-major-revision-to-astm-g155.
97. 10.3390/su1219804410.3390/su12198044 ↗
98. Galiana M. Somé C. & Petiteau C. (2024). Study of WMA containing RAP performances: Laboratory versus plant production case study. In A. Carter K. Vasconcelos & E. Dave (Eds.) 14th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements ISAP2024 Montreal (pp. 131–135). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67252-1_2210.1007/978-3-031-67252-1_22 ↗
99. 10.1007/BF0269792110.1007/BF02697921 ↗
100. 10.1080/14680629.2014.100094310.1080/14680629.2014.1000943 ↗