Mechanical and microstructural improvements in expansive soils treated with nano-modified biochar
Source abstract
Abstract
Expansive clays cause cracking and heaving in pavements. This study employs a novel combination of bagasse biochar and nano-silica to increase strength and mitigate the swelling behaviour of expansive soil. Blends were prepared using combinations of bagasse biochar (0–12%) and nano-silica (0–2%) to stabilise the soil. The optimal blend, 1.33% nano-silica with 8% bagasse biochar, enhanced unconfined compressive strength from 300 kPa to 920.8 kPa and reduced the 24 h swell index from 5.55% to 1.65%. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns provided supportive evidence of attenuation in peaks associated with montmorillonite due to the addition of nano-modified biochar. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imagery illustrated a denser gel-bridged structure with fewer shrinkage cracks. Factorial ANOVA with Tukey–Kramer confirmed notable interactions among soil, nano-silica, and biochar. Pavement design analysis showed that the treated subgrades could support thinner sections while meeting the adopted design criteria.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Engineering and Technology (UET)
College of Engineering and Technology, University of Sargodha
Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU)
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Affam A. C. Chundi B. A. & Chung W. C. (2023). Peat soil improvement for amenable wetland development-review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.10.1088/1755-1315/1135/1/012028 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10706-020-01191-y10.1007/s10706-020-01191-y ↗
3. 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12918-110.1140/epjp/i2019-12918-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.00710.1016/j.still.2015.08.007 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12517-018-4056-710.1007/s12517-018-4056-7 ↗
6. 10.1201/978020396807910.1201/9780203968079 ↗
7. 10.3390/su1605215710.3390/su16052157 ↗
8. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
9. 10.1080/14680629.2025.245401910.1080/14680629.2025.2454019 ↗
10. ASTM International. (2000). Standard test methods for moisture, ash and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.
11. ASTM International. (2009). Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort.
12. ASTM International. (2016). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil.
13. ASTM International. (2017a). Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system).
14. ASTM International. (2017b). Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis.
15. ASTM International. (2017c). Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis.
16. ASTM international. (2018). Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils.
17. ASTM International. (2022). Standard test methods for chemical analysis of hydraulic cement In.
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.08610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.086 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.11510.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.115 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.01110.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12865310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128653 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2025.248783010.1080/14680629.2025.2487830 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.14875610.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148756 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41598-019-51663-210.1038/s41598-019-51663-2 ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2021.188346610.1080/14680629.2021.1883466 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10706-015-9962-910.1007/s10706-015-9962-9 ↗
27. 10.1680/jgrim.15.0002610.1680/jgrim.15.00026 ↗
28. 10.3846/16486897.2017.133116810.3846/16486897.2017.1331168 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12072310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120723 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.30610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.306 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.11310.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.113 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.clay.2019.03.01410.1016/j.clay.2019.03.014 ↗
33. 10.1007/s42773-023-00253-710.1007/s42773-023-00253-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12291810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122918 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11287610.1016/j.jobe.2025.112876 ↗
36. 10.1007/s41062-019-0231-210.1007/s41062-019-0231-2 ↗
37. 10.1080/17583004.2024.236478410.1080/17583004.2024.2364784 ↗
38. Hatefi, M. H., Arabani, M., Hosseinpour, I., Payan, M., & Ranjbar, P. Z. (2025). Mechanical behavior and microstructural investigation of loess sustainable stabilization using nanosilica and GGBS. Scientific Reports.
39. 10.1007/s10706-020-01549-210.1007/s10706-020-01549-2 ↗
40. 10.2478/jaes-2019-001910.2478/jaes-2019-0019 ↗
41. 10.1007/s13369-021-06453-210.1007/s13369-021-06453-2 ↗
42. 10.53243/ICEG2023-17610.53243/ICEG2023-176 ↗
43. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102897010.1080/14680629.2015.1028970 ↗
44. 10.1520/GTJ2022029410.1520/GTJ20220294 ↗
45. 10.1007/s12633-021-01455-z10.1007/s12633-021-01455-z ↗
46. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.10112310.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101123 ↗
47. 10.26480/jwbm.02.2024.111.11510.26480/jwbm.02.2024.111.115 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12536310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125363 ↗
49. 10.1177/105678952199119410.1177/1056789521991194 ↗
50. 10.1177/105678952199119410.1177/1056789521991194 ↗
51. 10.2478/sgem-2025-000310.2478/sgem-2025-0003 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14313610.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143136 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.pce.2025.10398510.1016/j.pce.2025.103985 ↗
54. Mostafa, A., Ouf, M. S., & Elgendy, M. (2016). Stabilization of subgrade pavement layer using silica fume and nano silica. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 7(3), 573–581.
55. Mu R. Chen A. Li W. Lin S. & Ling L. (2023). Orthogonal experimental study on crack resistance of biochar and sisal fiber composite improved expansive soil. E3S Web of Conferences.10.1051/e3sconf/202340601041 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.52410.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.524 ↗
57. 10.1007/s40999-023-00857-x10.1007/s40999-023-00857-x ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.00510.1016/j.jrmge.2023.05.005 ↗
59. 10.1007/s12649-020-01172-510.1007/s12649-020-01172-5 ↗
60. 10.1007/978-981-16-3383-6_2910.1007/978-981-16-3383-6_29 ↗
61. 10.1080/14680629.2025.250559710.1080/14680629.2025.2505597 ↗
62. 10.1680/geng.2000.143.4.23510.1680/geng.2000.143.4.235 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.still.2017.08.00710.1016/j.still.2017.08.007 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.matlet.2024.13604610.1016/j.matlet.2024.136046 ↗
65. Sarkar A. Pattanayak S. GuhaRay A. Guoxiong M. Zhu H.-H. & Garg A. (2020). Influence of in-house produced biochar on geotechnical properties of expansive clay. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012072 ↗
66. 10.1007/s41062-024-01675-310.1007/s41062-024-01675-3 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e0452810.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04528 ↗
68. Sohaib, N., Faiz, M. S., & Sana, G. (2018). Use of acrylic polymer for stabilization of clayey soil. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 9(11), 433–438.
69. 10.1080/14680629.2025.250598510.1080/14680629.2025.2505985 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.catena.2021.10546010.1016/j.catena.2021.105460 ↗
71. 10.1007/s11368-020-02720-110.1007/s11368-020-02720-1 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10038710.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100387 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10273710.1016/j.jobe.2021.102737 ↗
74. 10.1007/s40891-021-00277-810.1007/s40891-021-00277-8 ↗
75. 10.1111/sum.1273110.1111/sum.12731 ↗
76. 10.1007/s13399-022-02795-510.1007/s13399-022-02795-5 ↗
77. 10.1007/s13399-021-01346-810.1007/s13399-021-01346-8 ↗
78. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.000180910.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001809 ↗
79. 10.1007/s42114-024-01181-110.1007/s42114-024-01181-1 ↗
80. 10.1080/1064119X.2018.156440610.1080/1064119X.2018.1564406 ↗
81. 10.1007/s42773-024-00423-110.1007/s42773-024-00423-1 ↗
82. 10.1080/14680629.2025.246787510.1080/14680629.2025.2467875 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0326110.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03261 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13834110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138341 ↗
85. 10.1093/tse/tdab03110.1093/tse/tdab031 ↗
86. 10.1007/s40891-020-00206-110.1007/s40891-020-00206-1 ↗
87. 10.1680/jgrim.17.0008610.1680/jgrim.17.00086 ↗
88. 10.1002/jpln.20130059610.1002/jpln.201300596 ↗