Laboratory investigations on geogrid-, geotextile-, and geocell- stabilised moderately swelling subgrades
Source abstract
Abstract
Expansive subgrades undergo moisture-induced volumetric changes due to water infiltration from the pavement surface and shoulders, leading to differential subgrade heave and nonuniform swell pressures on the overlying pavement layers. This study evaluates the effectiveness of different geosynthetic reinforcements in mitigating differential subgrade heave, quantified in terms of potential vertical rise (PVR) and surface heave. Largescale model experiments were conducted in a 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.1 m test chamber, where swell pressures ranging from 0 to 450 kPa were applied at the subgrade level using a 250 mm diameter circular plate. Both unreinforced and reinforced pavement sections were investigated using woven biaxial polyester geogrids and woven polyester geotextiles with ultimate tensile strengths of 100 and 200 kN/m, along with polyethylene geocells having cell depths of 150 and 200 mm. Geocells showed the highest PVR reduction (≈67%), followed by geotextiles (56%) and geogrids (28%) at 450 kPa swell pressure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology
Funding
Ministry of Textiles, Government of India
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/geotechnics102001510.3390/geotechnics1020015 ↗
2. 10.1088/1757-899X/586/1/01201210.1088/1757-899X/586/1/012012 ↗
3. Anjan Kumar, M., & Prasada Raju, G. V. R. (2009). Use of lime cement stabilized pavement construction. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 16(4), 269–276.
4. Anjan Kumar M. Prasada Raju G. V. R. & Prasad S. (2017 December). Field studies of model flexible pavements laid on lime and metakaolin treated expansive soil subgrades.
5. 10.1520/D2487-1710.1520/D2487-17 ↗
6. 10.1520/D1557-12R2110.1520/D1557-12R21 ↗
7. 10.1520/D1883-2110.1520/D1883-21 ↗
8. 10.1520/D294010.1520/D2940 ↗
9. 10.1520/D308010.1520/D3080 ↗
10. ASTM D854-02. (2002). Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International 04 1-9.
11. Cantillo, V., Mercado, V., & Pájaro, C. (2017). Empirical correlations for the swelling pressure of expansive clays in the city of Barranquilla, Colombia [Correlaciones empíricas para la determinación de la presión de expansión de arcillas expansivas en Barranquilla, Colombia]. Earth Sciences Research Journal, 21(1), 45–49.10.15446/esrj.v21n1.60226 ↗
12. 10.3390/app901003010.3390/app9010030 ↗
13. Christopher B. R. (2010). A design workshop geogrids in roadway and pavement systems Global Synthetics 102. http://www.mdt.mt.gov/research/projects/geotech/subgrade.shtml
14. Ebid, A., & Arafat, H. (2015). Optimum replacement depth to control heave of swelling clays. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT), 4(9), 9.
15. 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00205-310.1016/S0013-7952(02)00205-3 ↗
16. Erzin, Y., & Erol, O. (2004). Correlations for quick prediction of swell pressures. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14(1), 78–87.
17. 10.1007/s12517-019-4271-x10.1007/s12517-019-4271-x ↗
18. IRC 37. (2018). Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements_Latest. 53(9).
19. 10.1155/2020/151096910.1155/2020/1510969 ↗
20. 10.1680/icemge.66816.044710.1680/icemge.66816.0447 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.03.00610.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.03.006 ↗
22. Kief O. & Rajagopal K. (2008). Three-dimensional cellular confinement system contribution to structural pavement reinforcement. Geosynthetics India ‘08 Seminar Hyderabad India.
23. 10.1061/JSFEAQ.000121810.1061/JSFEAQ.0001218 ↗
24. 10.1016/0266-1144(94)90040-X10.1016/0266-1144(94)90040-X ↗
25. Lytton R. Aubeny C. & Bulut R. (2004). Design procedure for pavements on expansive soils: volume 1 Type of report and period covered Unclassified. 7(2). http://www.ntis.gov.
26. McDowell C. (1956). Interrelationship of load volume change and. soils geology and Foundations C 754–772.
27. MoRTH. (2013). Specifications for road bridge works 5th Revision. Indian Roads Congress on behalf of the Govet. of India Ministry of Road Transport & Highway Vol. 1 1–883.
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:5(392)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:5(392) ↗
29. 10.3328/IJGE.2010.04.01.99-11010.3328/IJGE.2010.04.01.99-110 ↗
30. 10.1346/CCMN.1971.019040610.1346/CCMN.1971.0190406 ↗
31. Phanikumar, R., & Suri, S. (2013). Expansive soils: Problems and remedies. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. https://books.google.com.et/books?id=7drYnQEACAAJ.
32. Rao A. S. & Sridevi G. (2011). Utilization of industrial wastes in pavements laid over expansive clay sub-grades. Geo-Frontiers 2011 © ASCE 2011 4762. (2011). Public Works Ara 2004 4762–4772.10.1061/41165(397)452 ↗
33. Reddy, C. N. V. S., & Reddy, K. C. (2011). Reinforced flexible pavement design over expansive clay subgrade. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 41(2), 86–94.
34. 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.000220610.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002206 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.07.00310.1016/j.jseaes.2004.07.003 ↗
36. 10.4314/rjeste.v4i1.410.4314/rjeste.v4i1.4 ↗
37. 10.3390/geotechnics304005310.3390/geotechnics3040053 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13243510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132435 ↗
39. Vijayvergiya, V. N., & Ghazzaly, O. I. (1973). Prediction of swelling potential for natural clays. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Expansive Soils, 1, 227–236.
40. 10.1051/e3sconf/20233680202810.1051/e3sconf/202336802028 ↗
41. 10.1061/9780784482124.04410.1061/9780784482124.044 ↗
42. 10.1680/jgein.20.0004310.1680/jgein.20.00043 ↗
43. 10.13140/RG.2.2.11488.153610.13140/RG.2.2.11488.1536 ↗