Innovative pavement composite using graphene oxide in pervious concrete: durability performance analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
This study develops durable pervious concrete (PC) for pavements by incorporating Graphene Oxide (GO), varying aggregate proportions, and using two cement-to-aggregate ratios (1:4 and 1:5). A comprehensive analysis was conducted on paste drain down, workability, hardened density, porosity, infiltration, compressive strength, freeze-thaw, ravelling, abrasion, fire resistance, and clogging potential. PC exhibited mass loss below 5% and compressive strength loss below 20% after freeze-thaw cycles, meeting ASTM C666 standards. The mix M1-0-GO showed a ravelling loss of 35% at 28 days, reduced to 24.1% with 0.1% GO at 56 days. Abrasion loss decreased by 76% with GO, while fire resistance improved as mass loss at 600°C dropped from 5.9% to 2.7%. At 0.1% GO, compressive strength reached 36.15 MPa at 120 days. Microstructural analysis confirmed enhanced C-S-H and C-H gel formation, improving durability. This study presents an economical (Index = 0.0054) and eco-friendly approach for GO-modified PC in pavement applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 522. (2010). Pervious concrete: Report no. 522R-10 American Concrete Institute Farmington Hills MI p. 40.
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11845310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118453 ↗
3. 10.1007/s41062-024-01369-w10.1007/s41062-024-01369-w ↗
4. 10.1080/10298436.2024.233530910.1080/10298436.2024.2335309 ↗
5. 10.14359/5168792110.14359/51687921 ↗
6. ASTM, A. (2008). C666/C666M-03 Standard Test Method for resistance of concrete to rapid freezing and thawing. ASTM.
7. ASTM International. (2012). C1754/C1754 – 12: Standard Test Method for Density and Void Content of Hardened Pervious Concrete. Annu. B. ASTM Stand 3.
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:3(249)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:3(249) ↗
9. BIS. (2000). British Standards Institution BS EN 12350-1:2000 Testing Fresh Concrete.
10. BIS I. (1959). 516 Indian Standard methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi India.
11. BIS, I. (1989). 8112: 43 grade ordinary Portland cement–specification. Bureau of Indian Standards.
12. BIS, IS:2386 Part V. (1963, Reaffirmed 2002). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, part V: Soundness. Indian Standard, 1–14.
13. BIS IS 6461: PART-7. (1973). Glossary of terms relating to cement concrete - Part VII: Mixing, laying, compaction, curing and other construction aspects. Indian Standard, 1–360.
14. 10.1002/clen.20130011310.1002/clen.201300113 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.006 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.000011710.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000117 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.15410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.154 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000007910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000079 ↗
19. Devasena, M., & Karthikeyan, J. (2015). Investigation on strength properties of graphene oxide concrete. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention Research & Development, 1(1), 307–310.
20. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10100710.1016/j.jobe.2019.101007 ↗
21. EPA, A. (2008). Reducing urban heat islands: Compendium of strategies. Heat Island Reduction Activities, 1–23.
22. 10.1201/978142003843910.1201/9781420038439 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.047 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.01910.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.019 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57297010.1080/10298436.2011.572970 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1106090010.3390/ma11060900 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja01539a01710.1021/ja01539a017 ↗
28. IS: 15658-2006. (2006). Indian standard precast concrete block for paving-specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, 1–27.
29. IS: 2386 (Part IV). (2016). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Part 4: Mechanical properties. Indian Stand. pp. 1–37. New Delhi
30. 10.1007/978-981-13-6717-5_3610.1007/978-981-13-6717-5_36 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000004910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000049 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.08310.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.083 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159682810.1080/14680629.2019.1596828 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.058 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.26010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.260 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.08310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.083 ↗
37. Moruza, G. M., Ozyildirim, H. C., & Culver, T. B. (2017). Development of a special provision on the use of pervious concrete as a stormwater management tool in parking lots. Virginia Transportation Research Council. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36088
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.04810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.048 ↗
39. 10.1080/10298436.2023.227076410.1080/10298436.2023.2270764 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10627510.1016/j.jobe.2023.106275 ↗
41. 10.1680/jcoma.22.0009910.1680/jcoma.22.00099 ↗
42. NRMCA (2004). Freeze–thaw resistance of pervious concrete. MD: National Ready Mixed Concrete Association.
43. 10.1080/14680629.2024.243317510.1080/14680629.2024.2433175 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.02.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.02.001 ↗
45. Parikh, K., Shaikh, M., & Haji, A. (2016). Experimental investigation of mineral admixtures in pervious concrete. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(3), 84–87.
46. Paulchamy, B., Arthi, G., & Lignesh, B. D. (2015). A simple approach to stepwise synthesis of graphene oxide nanomaterial. Journal of Nanomedicine & Nanotechnology, 6(1), 1.
47. 10.1038/nature0936410.1038/nature09364 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.22710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.227 ↗
49. 10.1080/1536383X.2022.214123110.1080/1536383X.2022.2141231 ↗
50. 10.1080/07900627.2017.135753810.1080/07900627.2017.1357538 ↗
51. 10.1080/14680629.2024.244323410.1080/14680629.2024.2443234 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10120310.1016/j.jobe.2020.101203 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.01810.1016/j.watres.2011.10.018 ↗
55. Schaefer V. R. & Wang K. (2006). Mix design development for pervious concrete in cold weather climates. Iowa. Dept. of Transportation. Highway Division. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/38663
56. 10.1080/14680629.2022.216433210.1080/14680629.2022.2164332 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12134210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121342 ↗
58. Standard A. (2009). C1701/C1701M-09 standard test method for infiltration rate of in place pervious concrete. ASTM International.
59. Standard B. (1986). Structural use of concrete. BS8110. https://www.academia.edu/download/37578185/BS_8110_Part_2-1985.pdf
60. Tennis, P. D., Leming, M. L., & Akers, D. J. (2004). Pervious concrete pavements (Vol. 8). Portland Cement Association.
61. 10.1021/ja053003q10.1021/ja053003q ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.044 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.10535510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.105355 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.13410.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.134 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12871210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128712 ↗
66. 10.14359/5170112610.14359/51701126 ↗
67. Yang, Z. (2011). Freezing-and-thawing durability of pervious concrete under simulated field conditions. Materials Journal, 108(2), 187–195.
68. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.022 ↗
69. Yong C. F. & Deletic A. (2012). Factors that predict clogging through porous pavements. International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design (7th: 2012: Melbourne Vic.) 63–70. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316informit.826361884069261