Effect of natural zeolite in enhancing rutting behaviour of bituminous binder
Source abstract
Abstract
In the current scenario, the pavement industry focuses on incorporating sustainability and use locally available materials for road construction. Generally, road construction done using Hot Mix Asphalt requires high working temperature ranges. Warm Mix Asphalt is one of the ways that can be used to reduce the working temperature by adding suitable modifiers. This study aims to investigate the effect of locally available materials such as Natural Zeolite (NZ) to reduce the working temperature of mixes and in addition improve the performance of the pavement. Four dosages of NZ were used and the base binder was Viscosity Grade 30 (VG30).The modified binder was subjected to short-term aging and was tested for rutting performance using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery. With a low Jnr value of 0.1234 and 0.1364 along with higher value of percentage recovery of 31.77 and 25.45 for both stress levels of 0.1kPa and 3.2kPa respectively, it was concluded that adding 5% NZ to VG30 effectively enhanced pavement rutting performance and promoted sustainability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology Calicut
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2010a). Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T 315-20 Washington DC USA.
2. AASHTO. (2010b). Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. AASHTO designation: MP 19-10 Washington DC.
3. AASHTO. (2014). Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). AASHTO TP 70-13 Washington DC.
4. 10.1080/14680629.2019.163376610.1080/14680629.2019.1633766 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.13022710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130227 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969026010.1080/14680629.2010.9690260 ↗
7. 10.2478/sspjce-2015-001810.2478/sspjce-2015-0018 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.07110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.071 ↗
9. Holub, F., Hospido, L., & Wagner, U. J. (2016). Air pollution and labor supply: Evidence from social security data. Environment Economics Seminar November, 7(2016), 11. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from http://www.harikrushnaindustries.com
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.25710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.257 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11832410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118324 ↗
12. 10.3390/cryst1007062210.3390/cryst10070622 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13130010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131300 ↗
14. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0260910.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02609 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12024910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120249 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.10608810.1016/j.jece.2021.106088 ↗
17. Read, J., & Whiteoak, D. (2003). The shell bitumen handbook. Thomas Telford.
18. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81735210.1080/14680629.2013.817352 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.02610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.026 ↗
20. 10.1021/ef020135l10.1021/ef020135l ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13076210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130762 ↗
22. 10.28991/cej-2020-0309150510.28991/cej-2020-03091505 ↗
23. 10.3390/su1216641010.3390/su12166410 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.09310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.093 ↗
25. 10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.80-8610.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.80-86 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1109154210.3390/ma11091542 ↗
27. 10.35784/bud-arch.167710.35784/bud-arch.1677 ↗
28. 10.3390/app703029310.3390/app7030293 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1301001910.3390/ma13010019 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.054 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12248510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122485 ↗