Analysis of the mechanical properties and prediction of damage life for GBFS-HPMC/fibre pervious concrete after seawater erosion
Source abstract
Abstract
Pervious concrete has been used in coastal structures to erosion seawater. Based on the orthogonal test method, the effects of granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), and polypropylene plastisol textile fibre (PPTF) on the performance of permeable concrete after seawater erosion were investigated ; the results showed the following: After 30, 60, and 90 d of seawater erosion, the optimal additions of GBFS, HPMC, and PPTF were (15%, 0.15%, 0.5%), (20%, 0.15%, 0.5%), and (20%, 0.15%, 0.5%) respectively. Compared with C-0, the mass loss rate and strength loss rate were reduced by up to 61.60% and 63.93%, respectively, and the relative kinetic–elastic modulus was increased by up to 11.14%. Micromorphology revealed that the proper mixing of slag, cellulose, and plastic fibre significantly improves the structure's stability. Finally, using the relative kinetic–elastic modulus for Weibull and NSGM(1,N) models predictions provides more accurate results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Liaoning University of Technology
Power China Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited
Funding
Research and Development of Key Technology and Engineering Application of Hydraulic Ductile Concrete · Research on Mechanical Properties and Durability of Fiber Reinforced Seawater Sea Sand Concrete Members in Harsh Environments
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Agarwal A. (2020). Laboratory investigation on pervious concrete for pavements. [Ph.D. Thesis]. National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra. http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4171
2. 10.3846/13923730.2015.111193410.3846/13923730.2015.1111934 ↗
3. 10.1080/14680629.2011.65183410.1080/14680629.2011.651834 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.11510.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.115 ↗
5. 10.3390/ma1002009610.3390/ma10020096 ↗
6. Chen, D. L., Wang, X. Z., Wang, C. C., & He, J. J. (2023). Analysis and prediction of mechanical properties of RTSF/PVA slag concrete after high temperature based on NSGM(1, N) model. J. Disaster Prev. Mitig. Eng, 1–12.
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.07310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.073 ↗
8. 10.1080/10298436.2018.155421710.1080/10298436.2018.1554217 ↗
9. Deng, J. L. (1988). Grey prediction and decision making. Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, pp. 22–32.
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12771010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127710 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12262810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122628 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2016.125195710.1080/14680629.2016.1251957 ↗
13. 10.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20171024.00110.13656/j.cnki.gxkx.20171024.001 ↗
14. 10.1088/1742-6596/1904/1/01201810.1088/1742-6596/1904/1/012018 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.18610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.186 ↗
16. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1065-1069.189410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1065-1069.1894 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12475310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124753 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12950810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129508 ↗
19. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57297010.1080/10298436.2011.572970 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12946910.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129469 ↗
21. 10.1093/biosci/biy15410.1093/biosci/biy154 ↗
22. Jiang, K., Qi, C. Z., Cui, Y. J., Li, T. H., & Lu, Z. H. (2020). Effects of several factors such as cellulose on the properties of polyethylene fiber reinforced pervious concrete. Materials Review, 34, 189–192.
23. 10.1617/s11527-021-01719-510.1617/s11527-021-01719-5 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000121310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001213 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0289583810.1007/BF02895838 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apor.2014.01.00310.1016/j.apor.2014.01.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13259910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132599 ↗
28. Liu, S. F., Yang, Y. J., & Wu, L. F. (2017). Grey system theory and Its application, 8th ed. Science Press, pp. 113–160.
29. 10.1038/s41558-021-01151-110.1038/s41558-021-01151-1 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.010 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.11810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.118 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.10379810.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103798 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.023 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10695410.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106954 ↗
35. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89332510.1080/10298436.2014.893325 ↗
36. 10.1007/s13280-023-01901-910.1007/s13280-023-01901-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00184-410.1016/S0008-8846(03)00184-4 ↗
38. Qiao, H. X., Su, R., Li, Q., & Sun, X. (2023). Study on durability of recycled aggregate pervious concrete under different freezing-thawing media based on weibull distribution. J. Funct. Mater, 54, 3134–3142.
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.04210.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.042 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.19410.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.194 ↗
42. Ramkrishnan, R., Narayana, P. N., Aziz, A., & Gowri, R. (2019). Utilization of geotextile fabric and permeable concrete to prevent coastal erosion. New solutions for challenges in applications of New materials and geotechnical issues. Proceedings of the 5th Geo China international conference 2018-civil infrastructures confronting severe weathers and climate changes: From failure to sustainability, Hangzhou, China, 23–25 July 2018; Springer International Publishing, pp. 144–160.
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11889610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118896 ↗
44. Seeni, B. S., & Madasamy, M. I. (2021). A review of factors influencing performance of pervious concrete. Građevinar, 73(10), 1017–1030. https://hrcak.srce.hr/265701
45. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10618610.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106186 ↗
46. 10.1080/10298436.2020.183656210.1080/10298436.2020.1836562 ↗
47. 10.1680/jadcr.18.0000810.1680/jadcr.18.00008 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12459010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124590 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00115-410.1016/S0958-9465(02)00115-4 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.10681610.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106816 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.08510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.085 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12486310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124863 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10377010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103770 ↗
54. Wang, K., Schaefer, V. R., Kevern, J. T., & Suleiman, M. T. (2006). Development of mix proportion for functional and durable pervious concrete. Proceedings of the NRMCA concrete technology forum: Focus on pervious concrete, Nashville, TN, USA, 24–25 pp. 1–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264841848
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.14910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.149 ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.191705111610.1073/pnas.1917051116 ↗
57. 10.1080/14680629.2017.133704210.1080/14680629.2017.1337042 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.025 ↗
59. 10.3390/ma1619645510.3390/ma16196455 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11861210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118612 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11022310.1016/j.matchar.2020.110223 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.127 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12997110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129971 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.077 ↗
65. Zeng, B. (2020). Grey prediction theory and Its application. Science Press, pp. 89–100.
66. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11784310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117843 ↗
67. 10.3390/buildings1205067610.3390/buildings12050676 ↗
68. 10.20016/j.cnki.hykfygl.2018.10.00510.20016/j.cnki.hykfygl.2018.10.005 ↗
69. 10.1088/1742-6596/2463/1/01203110.1088/1742-6596/2463/1/012031 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11149710.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111497 ↗