Reply to “A discussion on the paper ‘Determination of mortar setting times using shear wave velocity evolution curves measured by the bender element technique’” by J. Carette and S. Staquet
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Large variations in ti and tf of cement-based materials exist if materials of different nature were considered altogether, which yields inaccurate predictions. Hence, the authors propose that wave velocity-based methods should be calibrated for each group of materials of the same hydration processes in nature. Exciting frequency close to the natural frequency and long travel distance are recommended. Time domain methods are still often used and reliable in first arrival time determination. A comparison between the authors' and the system used by Carette and Staquet is provided along with recommendations for future studies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Monitoring the setting process of eco-binders by ultrasonic P-wave and S-wave transmission velocity measurement: mortar vs concrete10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.019 ↗
2. Influence of silanes on the setting time and early age hardening of bulk hydrophobic mortars
3. Applicability of ultrasonic measurement on the monitoring of the setting of cement pastes: effect of water content and mineral additions10.1520/ACEM20160062 ↗
4. A discussion on the paper “Determination of mortar setting times using shear wave velocity evolution curves measured by the bender element technique”
5. Determination of setting times of mortars using shear wave velocity evolution curves measured by bender element technique10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.01.013 ↗
6. Monitoring the setting process of mortars by ultrasonic P and S-wave transmission velocity measurement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.054 ↗
7. Experimental study investigating the effects of setup conditions on bender element velocity results10.1520/GTJ20120131 ↗
8. Horizontally mounted bender elements for measuring anisotropic shear moduli in triaxial clay specimens10.1520/GTJ11333J ↗
9. Measurement biases in the bender element test10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:5(564) ↗
10. Closure to “discussion of ‘measurement of stiffness anisotropy in kaolinite using bender element tests in a floating wall consolidometer’ by X. Kang, G.-C. Kang, and B. Bate” by Coffman, Salazar and Zhao10.1520/GTJ20160123 ↗
11. Zhu · 2015
12. Lab measurements of Gmax using bender elements
13. Fabrication, operation, and health monitoring of bender elements for aggressive environments10.1520/GTJ103300 ↗
14. Shear wave velocity and its anisotropy of polymer modified high volume class f fly ash-kaolinite mixtures10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001562 ↗
15. Experimental analysis of the effects of fluid-solid coupling on the velocity of elastic waves in porous media10.1680/geot.1997.47.5.993 ↗
16. Fast stacking and phase corrections of shear wave signals in a noisy environment10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:8(1154) ↗
17. Monitoring setting and hardening process of mortar and concrete using ultrasonic shear waves10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.044 ↗
18. Interpretation of international parallel test on measurement of gmax using bender elements10.3208/sandf.49.631 ↗
19. Shear wave velocity anisotropy of kaolinite using a floating wall consolidometer-type bender element testing system10.1520/GTJ20120205 ↗
20. Lade · 2016