journal article·2024-09

A performance-related design for hot-mix asphalt (HMA) incorporating multiple design parameters

Yining Zhang, Lijun Sun, Huailei Cheng

Publisher page

Abstract

Traditionally, the mix design was majorly the trial and error process of optimising aggregate gradation and asphalt content. With the progress of concept and technology, the number of design gyrations (Ndes) has been gradually regarded as another important design variable. This research explored the potential advantage of mixes designed incorporating multiple design parameters. The paper is divided into two parts. Part 1 designed the varied aggregate gradations with different levels of Ndes to evaluate the effect of incorporating the Ndes variable in a traditional process. Part 2 further explored the possible combinations of multiple design parameters, involving binder type, Ndes, RAP addition and aggregate gradation. The result showed that by selecting a suitable level of Ndes, the performance of mixes with different aggregate gradations can be well balanced to a certain extent. Besides, the performance of HMAs may be largely improved and some marginal materials can be reutilised by selecting a suitable combination of multiple design parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China

Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures & Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Technology, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China

The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China · Zhejiang Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Urban Infrastructure · Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Renewable Energy Infrastructure Construction Technology

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2014). Standard method of test for determining the fatigue life of compacted hot-mix asphalt (HMA) subjected to repeated flexural bending. T321-2014.
2. AASHTO. (2015). Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (HMA). T342-11.
3. Abdalla, A., Faheem, A. F., Hosseini, A., & Titi, H. (2021). Performance related asphalt mixtures characterization. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, United States, 2021.No. TRBAM-21-03073
4. Advanced Asphalt Technologies. (2011). A manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary. Transportation Research Board.
5. Ali U. M. Hernandez J. Al-Qadi I. & Ozer H. (2019). Three-dimensional balanced mix design for asphalt concrete. In Airfield and highway pavements 2019: Design construction condition evaluation and management of pavements. American Society of Civil Engineers (pp. 178–188).10.1061/9780784482452.018 ↗
6. Asphalt Institute. (2007). The asphalt handbook, MS-4 (7th ed.). the organization of Asphalt Institute.
7. ASTM. (2021). Standard specification for performance graded asphalt binder (astm d6373-2021). American Society for Testing and Materials.
8. Buchanan S. (2016). Balanced mix design task force: Update of activities. Asphalt Mixture Expert Task Group (ETG) Meeting.
9. Buttlar, W., Urra, L. A., Jahangiri, B., Rath, P., & Majidifard, H. (2020). Support for balanced asphalt mixture design specification development in Missouri. Missouri Department of Transportation, 103, 1–106.
10. Christensen, D. W., & Bonaquist, R. F. (2006). Volumetric requirements for superpave mix design. Transportation Research Board, 567, 1–56.
11. 10.1080/10298436.2018.143036510.1080/10298436.2018.1430365 ↗
12. Ghanbari, A. (2020). Performance and reliability analysis of asphalt mixtures in a performance-related specification. North Carolina State University.
13. 10.1177/0361198121105663910.1177/03611981211056639 ↗
14. 10.5703/128828431601010.5703/1288284316010 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.10310.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.103 ↗
16. Ministry of Communications of China. (2017). Specifications for design of highway asphalt pavement (jtg/d50-2017). Ministry of Communications of the people’s Republic of China.
17. Moutier F. (1982). Prevision de la compactabilite des enrobes bitumineux a l'aide de la presse a cisaillement giratoire (pcg). BULL LIAISON LAB PONTS CHAUSS 121.
18. Rahbar-Rastegar R. Pouranian M. R. Batioja-Alvarez D. Notani M. A. Montoya M. & Haddock J. E. (2022). Superpave 5: Improving asphalt mixture performanceed. Proceedings of the RILEM International Symposium on Bituminous Materials: ISBM Lyon 2020 1 1711–1717. Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-46455-4_217 ↗
19. Team, W. F. (1998). Performance of coarse-graded mixes at westrack–premature rutting. Final Report, 288, 289.
20. 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-95710.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-957 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.13010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.130 ↗
22. Yan T. Marasteanu M. Le J.-L. Turos M. & Cash K. (2022a). Development of superpave 5 asphalt mix designs for minnesota pavements.
23. 10.1177/0361198121106542910.1177/03611981211065429 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.03510.1016/j.matdes.2017.12.035 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12427710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124277 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12671510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126715 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000374710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003747 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000329510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003295 ↗
29. Zhou F. Hu S. & Scullion T. (2006). Integrated asphalt (overlay) mixture design balancing rutting and cracking requirements.
30. Zhou, F., Scullion, T., Walubita, L., & Wilson, B. (2014). Implementation of a performance-based mix design system in Texas. Application of Asphalt Mix Performance-Based Specifications, 32, 32–50.