Effects of temperature on the dynamic response of airfield runway subgrade in cold regions
Source abstract
Abstract
Subject to the coupling effect of climate and aircraft loads, different diseases of runway in cold regions have frequently occurred after long-term operation. To understand the causes of such diseases, finite element simulation and laboratory-scaled model tests were conducted. The results indicate that as the environment temperature decreased to −60°C, the landing impact load of aircraft could be magnified 1.7 times. Thus, the controlled depth for the required reinforcement construction quality of runway subgrade in cold areas should be increased to 3 m. The fundamental frequency of subgrade (f) was found to be sensitive to the coupling effect than the amplitude of the acceleration (amax) and of the acceleration energy spectrum function (PSDmax). This can supplement the dynamic difference indicated by amax and PSDmax. The Boltzmann model was successfully applied to the vibration analysis of runway subgrade (R2 > 0.9). The findings can facilitate the management and maintenance decisions for runways.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Icing and De-icing Technologies · Climate change and permafrost
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University
Civil Aviation University of China
CAAC
Harbin Institute of Technology
Engineering Construction Headquarters, Henan Province Airport Group Co., Ltd.
Northeast Branch Company of China Airport Planning & Design Institute Co., Ltd.
Civil Aviation Airport Construction Engineering Co. Ltd.
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Construction and Industrialization, CAAC · Zhengzhou Xinzheng International Airport Phase III Expansion Project
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). (2012). Standard specification for classification of soil and soil aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes AASHTO Designation: M 145-91 (2012). AASHTO USA.
2. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.00910.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12995010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129950 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.19310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.193 ↗
5. 10.1631/jzus.A200037810.1631/jzus.A2000378 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.09.002 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2017.142125310.1080/14680629.2017.1421253 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.10111710.1016/j.trgeo.2023.101117 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.10078310.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100783 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.01710.1016/j.geoderma.2017.07.017 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.02.00410.1016/j.coldregions.2009.02.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.00810.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.10391410.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103914 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.10394410.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103944 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.10339310.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103393 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.08.00510.1016/j.coldregions.2009.08.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.01.00410.1016/j.coldregions.2009.01.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.csite.2022.10198510.1016/j.csite.2022.101985 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.10087010.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100870 ↗
20. Liu G. G. (2020). Research on dynamic evaluation theory and application of airport runway health status in cold area. Thesis (PhD). University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese).
21. 10.1080/10298436.2019.156792210.1080/10298436.2019.1567922 ↗
22. 10.1007/s42417-023-01112-210.1007/s42417-023-01112-2 ↗
23. 10.1080/10298436.2021.189917810.1080/10298436.2021.1899178 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.10599610.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105996 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.17410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.174 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.03.00410.1016/j.coldregions.2019.03.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10323910.1016/j.jobe.2021.103239 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10024810.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100248 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.02810.1016/j.cma.2017.01.028 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10053610.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100536 ↗
31. 10.1007/s13369-020-04723-z10.1007/s13369-020-04723-z ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.10436110.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104361 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2023.220766410.1080/14680629.2023.2207664 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.11550810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115508 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.11.00910.1016/j.soildyn.2008.11.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.06.00910.1016/j.enggeo.2012.06.009 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11434-012-5587-z10.1007/s11434-012-5587-z ↗
38. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.04710.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.047 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.10367310.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103673 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.10358610.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103586 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.03110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.031 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10030410.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100304 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.00810.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.008 ↗
44. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.178-181.161110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.178-181.1611 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.07.00710.1016/j.coldregions.2011.07.007 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12790310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127903 ↗