Hybrid neuro swarm intelligence paradigms for predicting the shear strength of sub-soil of heavy-haul freight corridor
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aims to circumvent the operation of conducting laboratory tests of soil shear strength through a hybrid machine learning approach. The proposed approach integrates extreme learning machine (ELM) and particle swarm optimisation (PSO) with adaptive acceleration coefficients. Three hybrid ELMs, namely PSO optimised ELM with time-varying acceleration coefficients (ELM-TP), ELM optimised by improved PSO (ELM-IP), and ELM optimised by modified PSO (ELM-MP), have been established. Subsequently, the concept of mean PSO has been incorporated, and three additional hybrid models, namely ELM-TP integrated with mean PSO (ELM-TMP), ELM-IP integrated with mean PSO (ELM-IMP), and ELM-MP integrated with mean PSO (ELM-MMP), are constructed. The proposed concept is also used to construct six artificial neural network (ANN)-based hybrid models (i.e. ANN-TP, ANN-IP, ANN-MP, ANN-TMP, ANN-IMP, and ANN-MMP). Experimental results exhibit that the constructed ELM-IMP and ANN-IMP models can achieve the most desired accuracies in predicting the shear strength of soils.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Patna
Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)
Department of Civil Engineering, BITS-Pilani Hyderabad Campus
Chongqing University
Rajnagar Mahavidyalaya
Department of Geological Engineering, Hacettepe University
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Adeyeri, J. B. (2014). Technology and practice in geotechnical engineering. IGI Global.
2. 10.1108/0264440111111813210.1108/02644401111118132 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12517-013-1174-010.1007/s12517-013-1174-0 ↗
4. 10.1007/s11600-017-0082-110.1007/s11600-017-0082-1 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00521-019-04663-210.1007/s00521-019-04663-2 ↗
6. 10.1109/ROBIO.2009.542050410.1109/ROBIO.2009.5420504 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.10759510.1016/j.asoc.2021.107595 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.00610.1016/j.eswa.2007.06.006 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00366-018-0643-110.1007/s00366-018-0643-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.aei.2018.09.00510.1016/j.aei.2018.09.005 ↗
11. 10.1080/17499518.2020.181521510.1080/17499518.2020.1815215 ↗
12. 10.1088/1755-1315/428/1/01208910.1088/1755-1315/428/1/012089 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.03410.1016/j.catena.2017.05.034 ↗
14. 10.1109/ISDA.2008.8610.1109/ISDA.2008.86 ↗
15. Das, B. M. (2021). Principles of geotechnical engineering. Cengage learning.
16. Das, B. M., & Sivakugan, N. (2016). Fundamentals of geotechnical engineering. Cengage Learning.
17. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.00110.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.001 ↗
18. 10.1504/IJCISTUDIES.2009.02533910.1504/IJCISTUDIES.2009.025339 ↗
19. Fukuyama Y. & Yoshida H. (2001). A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control in electric power systems. Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No. 01TH8546). IEEE pp. 87–93.10.1109/CEC.2001.934375 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.00310.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.003 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11440-019-00843-510.1007/s11440-019-00843-5 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00521-016-2434-110.1007/s00521-016-2434-1 ↗
23. 10.3208/sandf.36.4_110.3208/sandf.36.4_1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.03110.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.031 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.12610.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
26. Hunt, R. E. (1986). Geotechnical engineering techniques and practices. McGraw-Hill.
27. 10.1007/s00500-017-2778-110.1007/s00500-017-2778-1 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10706-008-9228-x10.1007/s10706-008-9228-x ↗
29. 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.00810.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.008 ↗
30. Kennedy J. & Eberhart R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95 – International Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE pp. 1942–1948.10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00521-021-06125-010.1007/s00521-021-06125-0 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00500-021-06628-x10.1007/s00500-021-06628-x ↗
33. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.12.00610.1016/j.enggeo.2011.12.006 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00366-018-0596-410.1007/s00366-018-0596-4 ↗
35. 10.3390/app913263010.3390/app9132630 ↗
36. 10.3217/jucs-015-04-074210.3217/jucs-015-04-0742 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00521-020-05214-w10.1007/s00521-020-05214-w ↗
38. 10.3390/app922473810.3390/app9224738 ↗
39. 10.3390/app921464310.3390/app9214643 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10757610.1016/j.measurement.2020.107576 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.engappai.2014.03.01210.1016/j.engappai.2014.03.012 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.00710.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.007 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11053-020-09676-610.1007/s11053-020-09676-6 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.00410.1016/j.catena.2018.04.004 ↗
45. Raghuram, G., & Verma, A. (2019). Dedicated freight corridor: Current challenges. In World Conference on Transport Research-WCTR.
46. 10.1680/jgein.20.0004910.1680/jgein.20.00049 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.04.00710.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.04.007 ↗
48. 10.1080/10298436.2021.190423710.1080/10298436.2021.1904237 ↗
49. 10.1109/TEVC.2004.82607110.1109/TEVC.2004.826071 ↗
50. 10.1080/15715124.2019.168055710.1080/15715124.2019.1680557 ↗
51. 10.1109/APCIP.2009.21710.1109/APCIP.2009.217 ↗
52. 10.1061/40510(287)1310.1061/40510(287)13 ↗
53. 10.1007/s11440-020-00962-410.1007/s11440-020-00962-4 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.engappai.2009.03.00710.1016/j.engappai.2009.03.007 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.00310.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.003 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.00310.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.003 ↗
57. 10.1007/s10462-021-09967-110.1007/s10462-021-09967-1 ↗
58. 10.1080/17499518.2019.167434010.1080/17499518.2019.1674340 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.00710.1016/j.gsf.2020.03.007 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.gsf.2019.12.00310.1016/j.gsf.2019.12.003 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.01610.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.016 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.12.00310.1016/j.undsp.2019.12.003 ↗