Impact of supplementary cementitious materials on the hydration and strength properties of hydraulic road binders
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydraulic road binders (HRBs) are specially designed materials for pavement stabilisation. The objective of this research was to investigate the properties of several laboratory-blended HRBs constituted of reduced cement clinker content and different types of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs). Formulated HRBs were characterised chemically and physically in the form of paste and mortar. Laboratory results showed a distinct reduction of hydration temperature and drying shrinkage in HRBs. In addition, HRBs had different contents of hydration products compared to Portland cement. Moreover, HRB mortars containing up to 50% of slag could have similar strength compared to GU and GUL at 28 curing days and onwards. It was also indicated that slag had superior strength development effect compared to the other two SCMs. Furthermore, a statistical prediction was conducted on compressive and flexural strength of HRB mixes. Finally, a framework of HRB optimisation was proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Pavement and Transportation Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Adaska, W. & Luhr, D. (2008).Control of reflective cracking in cement stabilized pavements.InProceedings of 5th international RILEM conference on cracking in pavements(pp. 309-316).
2. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.05.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.05.001 ↗
3. 10.28991/cej-2019-0309122210.28991/cej-2019-03091222 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.12610.1016/j.proeng.2015.06.126 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.09.011 ↗
6. Chen J. J. · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · 2010 · 93 · 148410.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03599.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.02110.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.021 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.08310.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.083 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.20810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.208 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.11310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.113 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.11210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.112 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.088 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.018 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.fuel.2006.05.01610.1016/j.fuel.2006.05.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.10710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.107 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.024 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.31710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.317 ↗
19. Neville A. · 1995
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.15310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.153 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00827-X10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00827-X ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10385910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103859 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.07810.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.078 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.00110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.10.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.01310.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.02510.1016/j.cemconres.2015.05.025 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.02610.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.026 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.08510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.085 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.01110.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.011 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.10.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2010.10.004 ↗
31. Wang S. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2020 · 1
32. Winter N. B. · 2012
33. 10.1617/s11527-015-0694-310.1617/s11527-015-0694-3 ↗