journal article·2021-09-02

Rheological characteristics of paving bitumens and recycled binder blends in relation to ageing

Tomas Koudelka, Pavel Coufalik, Ondrej Dasek, Iva Coufalikova, Michal Varaus

Publisher page

Abstract

The amount of produced asphalt mixtures incorporating reclaimed asphalt has been steadily increasing in the past years and so has the use of recycling agents. Some countries in Europe and elsewhere have already come into contact with repeatedly recycled materials. This study, therefore, investigated the influence of long-term ageing on multiple recycled binder blends and thereby simulated a repeated recycling process. In order to be able to understand the behaviour and well describe the characteristics of recycled binder blends, the obtained results were compared to the behaviour (results) of paving bitumens and reclaimed binders (binders extracted from Reclaimed Asphalt). Each binder group was then described by empirical tests as specified in the harmonised standard for paving bitumens (EN 12591) as well as by performance parameters for assessing long–term embrittlement such as viscoelastic temperature (VET) and the Glover–Rowe (G–R) parameter. It was found that recycled binder blends exhibited similar or higher penetration compared to paving bitumens upon recycling as well as after ageing, but the softening point shifted to a higher temperature domain. Likewise, reclaimed binders’ properties were rather similar to long-term aged paving bitumens than to recycled binder blends. Furthermore, it was confirmed that a strong correlation between VET and G–R exists although different binder groups manifested different durability thresholds. Additionally, a relationship was found between VET, G–R and softening point. It was proved that usage of empirical tests can in some cases provide asphalt engineers with equivalent information about binder rheology as modern functional parameters in case of non-modified binders.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Road Structures, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic

Funding

Technologická Agentura České Republiky

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Airey G. · 2011
2. Ali, H. & Mohammadafzali, M. (2015). Long-term aging of recycled binders. (Final report: BDV29 Two 977-01). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Transportation.
3. Anderson R. J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT) · 2011 · 615
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.024 ↗
5. Arnold, J. C., Nolting, M., Riebesehl, G. & Denck, C. (2012). Unlocking the full potential of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) – high quality asphalt courses incorporating more than 90% RAP, a case study. Proceeding of 5th E&E congress, ID O5EE-187, Istanbul, Turkey.
6. Büchler S. · Transporatation Research Record: Journal of the Transporatation Reserach Board · 2018 · 2672 · 28
7. 10.1080/14680629.2018.144750410.1080/14680629.2018.1447504 ↗
8. European Asphalt Pavement Association (EAPA). (2017). Enquiry “Asphalt Recycling” for CEN TC227 WG1 members and EAPA TC members. CEN TC227 WG1 - N1532 - Rejuvenators-17-N032, Brussel, Belgium.
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.012 ↗
10. Glover, C. J., Davison, R. R., Domke, C. H., Ruan, Y., Juristyarini, P., Knorr, D. B. & Jung, S. H. (2005). Development of a new method for assessing asphalt binder durability with field evaluation. Report FHWA/TX-05/1872-2, Austin, TX, Texas Department of Transportation.
11. Golalipour, A. (2013). Investigation of the effect of oil modification on critical characteristics of asphalt binders (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin Madison, US.
12. Hajj R. · 2018
13. 10.1080/10298436.2010.48872910.1080/10298436.2010.488729 ↗
14. Hill, C., Heslop, M., Widyatmoko, D., Elliott, R. & James, D. (2009, November). Bituminous binder – ageing profile test. Asphalt Professional.
15. Hugener, M. (2019). RILEM TC-264 RAP asphalt pavement recycling - Updateon Rejuvenators. EAPA workshop – Use of rejuvenators in asphalt mixtures, Padova, Italy.
16. Ipavec, A., Marsac, P. & Mollenhauer, K. (2012). Synthesis of the European national requirements and practices for recycling in HMA and WMA. Proceeding 5th E & E Congress, Istanbul, Turkey.
17. 10.3141/2574-0810.3141/2574-08 ↗
18. Kennedy T. W. · 1994
19. King, G., Anderson, M., Hanson, D. & Blankenship, P. (2012). Using black space diagrams to predict age-induced cracking. 7th RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements, RILEM Bookseries (4), (pp. 453–463).10.1007/978-94-007-4566-7_44 ↗
20. Koudelka, T., Coufalik, P., Fiedler, J., Coufalikova, I., Varaus, M. & Yin, F. (2019). Rheological evaluation of asphalt blends at multiple rejuvenation and aging cycles, road materials pavement design, 20(EATA) (pp. 3–18). Lodnon: Taylor and Francis. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14680629.2019.1588150?journalCode=trmp2010.1080/14680629.2019.1588150 ↗
21. Koudelka, T., Coufalik, P., Varaus, M. & Coufalikova, I. (2018). Rejuvenated binders, reclaimed binders and paving bitumens, are they any different? Rilem 252 – CMB, RILEM Bookseries (20), (pp. 208–2013). Springer International. Retrieved from https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/rejuvenated-binders-reclaimed-binders-and-paving-bitumens-are-th/1611849210.1007/978-3-030-00476-7_33 ↗
22. Kriz, P., Grant, D., Boussad, N., Gausson, D., Cointe, F., Toulemonde, C. & Shirts, R. (2016). Assessment of performance specification tests for rheologically simple bitumens. Proceeding 6th E&E Congress, ID 269, Prague, Czech Republic.10.14311/EE.2016.269 ↗
23. Lee, D. (1969). Durability and durability tests for paving asphalts, A state of the art report (Project HR-124, Iowa State Highway Commission).
24. Lee M.-G. · International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering · 2004 · 2 · 245
25. Lesuer D. · 2013
26. Lu, X., Soenen, H. & Redelius, P. (2003). Fatigue and healing characteristics of bitumens studied using 24dynamic shear rheometer. Proceedings of the 6th RILEM symposium, Zurich; 25 (pp. 408–415).10.1617/2912143772.051 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2015.107701510.1080/14680629.2015.1077015 ↗
28. Muller, J. & Jenkins, K. J. (2011). The use of an extended rolling thin film ageing method as an alternative to the pressurised ageing vessel method in the determination of bitumen durability. 10th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa. 14 p.
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.00910.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.009 ↗
30. 10.1080/14680629.2016.118205810.1080/14680629.2016.1182058 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.030 ↗
32. Pfeiffer, J. P. H. & Saal, R. N. J. (1939). Asphaltic bitumen as colloid system. Sixteenth Colloid Symposium, Stanford University, US.
33. Plug, C., P., de Bondt, A. H. & Roos H. (2013). Performance of bitumen 70/100 obtained from different suppliers. Proceedings of 5th EATA conference, Braunschweig, Germany.
34. Porot, L. (2018). Rheology and bituminous binder, A review of different Analyses. Rilem 252 – CMB, RILEM Bookseries (20), (pp 50–55). Springer International. Retrieved from https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/rheology-and-bituminous-binder-a-review-of-different-analyses/1611853810.1007/978-3-030-00476-7_9 ↗
35. Porot L. · 2016
36. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138907110.1080/14680629.2017.1389071 ↗
37. Read J. · 2003
38. 10.1520/JTE2013024510.1520/JTE20130245 ↗
39. Rowe, G. & Sharrock, M. (2016). Cracking of asphalt pavements and the development of specifications with rheological measurements. Proceeding 6th E&E Congress, ID 215, Prague, Czech Republic.10.14311/EE.2016.215 ↗
40. Santagata E. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT) · 2009 · 567
41. 10.1155/2018/342896110.1155/2018/3428961 ↗
42. Soenen H. · 2016
43. Southern M. · 2015
44. Spiegl M. · Gestrata Journal · 2008 · 120 · 12
45. Österreichische Forschungsgesellschaft Strasse – Schiene – Verkehr, FSV. (2007). Technische Vertragsbedingungen RVS 08.97.05. Anforderungen an Asphaltmischgut. [Requirements for bituminous mixtures]. 26 pages.
46. Thenoux, G. (1987). Chemical characterization of asphalt cements using chromatographic techniques: Relation to rheological properties and field performance [Doctoral dissertation]. Oregon State University, USA.
47. 10.1002/jctb.501004050110.1002/jctb.5010040501 ↗
48. Widyatmoko D. · Journal of the Institute of Asphalt Technology, Asphalt Professional · 2005 · 14 · 3
49. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89333110.1080/10298436.2014.893331 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.035 ↗