Study on the forest road pavements reinforced with geogrids by using the 2D FEM method
Source abstract
Abstract
The forest road pavements ensure the transportation of wood from the primary platform to the public road. The traffic has seen a rapid development in terms of transportation capacity. Thus, the forest road pavements are subjected to increasing traffic pressures. To respond, the researchers come up with the optimisation of the road pavement by using geogrids. The main purpose of this study is to present the behaviour of forest pavements reinforced with geogrids under the traffic load. The calculation of the stress–strain state was performed by using the finite element method. Therefore, within its first part, the paper presents the results similarity for the calculation of forest road pavements by using softwares such as Calderom 2000, ANSYS and Rubicon ToolBox. The second part approaches the consolidation of road pavements with geogrids to reduce the elastic vertical deformations of pavements. Findings of this study revealed that the 2D FEM method and ANSYS software offer similar results when compared to classical software. The geogrids located at various heights of the pavement produced different vertical elastic deformations and the increase of their modulus of elasticity did not seem to be cost-effective. However, when doubled, the average elastic deformation was found of about 2.49%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
Faculty of Wood Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
Funding
European Social Found
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3141/2004-1310.3141/2004-13 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.06510.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.065 ↗
3. 10.3141/2045-1210.3141/2045-12 ↗
4. 10.1680/geot.1993.43.4.58910.1680/geot.1993.43.4.589 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.01.00810.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.01.008 ↗
7. 10.1680/jgein.16.0001910.1680/jgein.16.00019 ↗
8. Dosa A. · 2010 · 187
9. Duncan J. M. · National Research Council TRB · 1968 · 228 · 18
10. Dyer, M. R. (1985). Observations of the stress distribution in crushed glass with applications to soil reinforcement (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:98dee0c7-5e27-45b7-aef8-01bd56240671
11. 10.1016/j.aej.2016.09.02310.1016/j.aej.2016.09.023 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2007.969009610.1080/14680629.2007.9690096 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.11.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.11.003 ↗
14. Faur, N. (2002). Elemente Finite. Fundamente (Finite elements. Fundamentals). Retrieved from http://www.mec.upt.ro/rezi/EFF.pdf
15. FEHRL. (2009). A guide to then use of long-life semi-rigid pavements. In FEHRL REPORT 2009-01. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Karel_Pospisil/publication
16. 10.1680/jgein.15.0005710.1680/jgein.15.00057 ↗
17. Fodor, G. & Popescu, N. (2009). Structuri rutiere suple si semirigide. Dimensionare si alcatuire. (Flexible and semi-rigid road structures. Sizing and composition). Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/39687489/Structuri-Rutiere-Suple-Si-Semirigide-Dimension-Are-Si-Alcatuire
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775) ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(787)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(787) ↗
20. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.00510.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.005 ↗
21. 10.3141/2580-0510.3141/2580-05 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.00310.1016/j.ijprt.2016.03.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.00710.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.007 ↗
24. Jewell R. A. · Polymer Grid Reinforcement · 1984 · 18
25. Kim, M. (2007). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of flexible pavements considering nonlinear pavement foundation behavior (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://ict.illinois.edu/files/2014/09/Minkwan_Kim_Dissertation.pdf
26. Milligan G. W. E. · 1990 · 747
27. 10.1680/gein.15.0001410.1680/gein.15.00014 ↗
28. Moghaddas Tafreshi S. N. · European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering · 2017 · 1
29. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.00610.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.006 ↗
30. Najafi A. · Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering · 2013 · 34 · 17
31. NP075-02. (2002). Normativ pentru utilzarea materialelor geosintetice la lucrarile de constructii (Normative for the use of geosynthetic materials in construction works). Romania.
32. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.00710.1016/j.geotexmem.2004.03.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003 ↗
34. 10.1680/geot.1989.39.3.51110.1680/geot.1989.39.3.511 ↗
35. PD177. (2001). Normativ privind dimensionarea sistemelor rutiere suple si semirigide. Metoda Analitica (Normative on dimensioning of flexible and semirigid road systems. Analytical method). Romania.
36. Péterfalv J. · Croation Journal of Forest Engineering · 2015 · 36 · 269
37. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.00710.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.007 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2015.108017910.1080/14680629.2015.1080179 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.00210.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.002 ↗
40. 10.3141/1989-5210.3141/1989-52 ↗
41. Trzcinski G. · Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering · 2006 · 27 · 27
42. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.01110.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.06.011 ↗
43. 10.3141/2204-1010.3141/2204-10 ↗