journal article·2023-07-03

HPASC – OPCC bi-surface shear strength prediction model using deep learning

Pooria Khademi, Vahab Toufigh

Publisher page

Abstract

This research focused on high-performance alkali-activated slag concrete (HPASC) as an overlay material on ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC). HPASC specimens were designed with different NaOH molarity, silica fume (SF) content, steel fiber content, age of repair material, and proportion of grooved surface area to the gross area. The results indicated that the steel fibers in HPASC improved the compressive strength and increased the BSS strength. The convolutional neural network (CNN) and multilayered perceptron (MLP) were used to determine a comprehensive model for simulating the effect of each parameter on the BSS shear strength. The simulation results suggest that the CNN, as compared to MLP, can more accurately predict experimental data due to the less MSE and higher R-factor. According to the conducted simulations, HPASC mixed with 2% fibers, 12 molars NaOH solution, 20% SF content, and 30% grooved surface was the most suitable mixture for repair and rehabilitation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Sharif University of Technology

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s42768-020-00045-w10.1007/s42768-020-00045-w ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.10.00910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.10.009 ↗
3. 10.1080/14680629.2017.140848310.1080/14680629.2017.1408483 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.17110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.171 ↗
5. ASTM C1611. (2014). Standard test method for slump flow of self-consolidating concrete. ASTM International, i(May), 1–6.
6. ASTM C 33. (1986). ASTM c 33-03. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. United States: American Standard Testing and Material, i(C), 1–11.
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.08010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.080 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00659-710.1016/S0008-8846(01)00659-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.027 ↗
10. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000089010.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000890 ↗
11. 10.1109/ICSCCC.2018.870331610.1109/ICSCCC.2018.8703316 ↗
12. 10.3389/fmats.2018.0003410.3389/fmats.2018.00034 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.16910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.169 ↗
14. 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2007.08.01810.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2007.08.018 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.10.01410.1016/j.engappai.2012.10.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.03010.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.030 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11112210.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111122 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00154-410.1016/S0008-8846(99)00154-4 ↗
19. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2016). Deep learning (Vol. 1, no. 2). Cambridge: MIT Press. (n.d.).
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.110 ↗
21. Graybeal B. & Haber Z. (2018). Ultra-high performance concrete for bridge deck overlays (FHWA-HRT-17-097). 16. https://www.fhwa.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/bridge/17097/index.cfm
22. 10.3141/2240-0710.3141/2240-07 ↗
23. 10.1617/s11527-014-0354-z10.1617/s11527-014-0354-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.10610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.106 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.31210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.312 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11173110.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111731 ↗
27. 10.1617/s11527-012-9842-110.1617/s11527-012-9842-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10366510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103665 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10367010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103670 ↗
30. 10.1134/1.178877010.1134/1.1788770 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.02710.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.027 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.00710.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0020-0255(96)00200-910.1016/S0020-0255(96)00200-9 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-981-15-7078-0_310.1007/978-981-15-7078-0_3 ↗
35. Renckens, C. N. M. (2007). Alternatieve klinisch-chemische laboratoria: Leveranciers van onjuiste of niet-bestaande diagnosen. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde, 151(51), 2816–2819.
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.072 ↗
37. 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.12821010.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.128210 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10921-010-0086-010.1007/s10921-010-0086-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.11074610.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110746 ↗
40. 10.1080/14680629.2021.191055210.1080/14680629.2021.1910552 ↗
41. 10.1080/14680629.2021.195938510.1080/14680629.2021.1959385 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.013 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.06.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2007.06.011 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.10010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.100 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12224110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122241 ↗
46. U.S. Geological Survey. (2020). Mineral commodity summaries 2020. In U.S Department of the Interior U.S Geological Survey. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2020/mcs2020.pdf
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11775310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117753 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.02310.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.023 ↗
49. 10.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.30310.1146/annurev.energy.26.1.303 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.06810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.068 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0073010.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00730 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.01210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.012 ↗
53. 10.1080/14680629.2017.132986610.1080/14680629.2017.1329866 ↗