Experimental, analytical, and analogical study of the effect of RAP extracted binder on rheology of polymer modified binder
Source abstract
Abstract
This study attempts to scrutinise the effect of RAP on Performance Grade (PG), fatigue, and low temperature performance of polymer modified binder (PMB40). Furthermore, analytical, and analogical modelling was conducted. RAP from two sources was blended with PMB40 in proportions of 15%, 25%, and 40%. Thereafter, PG isochronal temperature sweeps, isothermal frequency sweeps and bending beam rheometer (BBR) testing was conducted. RAP sources affected both high and low temperature PG of PMB40. Viscoelastic transition temperature (TVET) increased on inclusion of RAP thereby compromising fatigue performance. Based on difference in critical temperatures (ΔTc), inclusion of RAP compromised the low temperature performance. Stiffness master curves (S(t)) illustrated an enhancement in stiffness on RAP inclusion whereas relaxation modulus master curves (E(t)) depicted a decrease in rate of decay of E(t) thereby compromising the low temperature stress relaxation potential. Both 2S2P1D and Huet models illustrated a reasonably good fit for various RAP blends.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.4236/ojce.2015.5302910.4236/ojce.2015.53029 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00146-710.1016/S0016-2361(03)00146-7 ↗
3. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012927.00747.8310.1023/B:JMSC.0000012927.00747.83 ↗
4. Anderson, D. A., Christensen, D. W., Bahia, H. U., Dongre, R., Sharma, M. G., Antle, C. E. & Button, J. (1994). Binder characterization and evaluation, volume 3: Physical characterization. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Report No. SHRP-A-369.
5. Anderson, D. A. & Marasteanu, M. (2010, September). Continuous models for characterizing linear viscoelastic behavior of asphalt binders. International Society for Asphalt Pavements workshop on Asphalt Binders and Mastics, Madison, WI (pp. 16–17).
6. Asgharzadeh, S. M. (2015). Modified asphalt binders evaluation using rheological master curves and black diagrams. In Proceedings of 5th IASTEM International Conference, Toronto, Canada (pp. 5–11).
7. ASTM Method D113 · 2007
8. ASTM Method D2172/D2172M-17 · 2017
9. ASTM Method D2872-19 · 2019
10. ASTM Method D36/D36M-14e1 · 2014
11. ASTM Method D4402/D4402M-15 · 2015
12. ASTM Method D4887/D4887M-11 · 2016
13. ASTM Method D5404/D5404M-12 · 2017
14. ASTM Method D5/D5M-13 · 2019
15. ASTM Method D6084/D6084M-18 · 2018
16. ASTM Method D6373-16 · 2016
17. ASTM Method D6521-19a · 2019
18. ASTM Method D6648-08 · 2016
19. ASTM Method D6816-11 · 2016
20. Bahia H. U. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1994 · 63 · 414
21. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130425310.1080/14680629.2017.1304253 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.09410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.094 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000072610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000726 ↗
24. Bull, A. L. & Vonk, W. C. (1984). Thermoplastic rubber/bitumen blends for roof and road. Shell Chemical Technical Manual TR 8, p. 15
25. Christensen R. M. · 1982
26. Christensen, D., Mensching, D., Rowe, G., Anderson, R. M., Hanz, A., Reinke, G. & Anderson, D. (2019). Past, present, and future of asphalt binder rheological parameters: Synopsis of 2017 Technical Session 307 at the 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Circular, (E-C241).
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.05710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.057 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126675810.1080/14680629.2016.1266758 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968999210.1080/14680629.2004.9689992 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.11410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.114 ↗
31. 10.1186/s40462-016-0086-510.1186/s40462-016-0086-5 ↗
32. Fakhri M. · Journal of Cleaner Production · 2017 · 165 · 112510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.079 ↗
33. Falchetto A. C. · 2011 · 549
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.016 ↗
35. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102970810.1080/14680629.2015.1029708 ↗
36. 10.1080/14680629.2018.144750410.1080/14680629.2018.1447504 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.042 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969021110.1080/14680629.2009.9690211 ↗
39. Huet, C. (1963). Étude par une méthode d’impédance du comportement viscoélastique des matériaux hydrocarbonés [Study of the viscoelastic behavior of bituminous mixes by method of impedance] [Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. thesis]. Faculte des Sciences de Paris, Paris (in French)).
40. 10.1016/S0167-6636(99)00038-110.1016/S0167-6636(99)00038-1 ↗
41. IS 15462 · 2019
42. Kim, Y. R. (2008). Modeling of asphalt concrete (1st ed.). New York, NY: ASCE Press USA, McGraw-Hill Construction.
43. 10.3141/2126-1310.3141/2126-13 ↗
44. 10.1122/1.55076410.1122/1.550764 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475110.1080/14680629.2013.774751 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.12410.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.124 ↗
47. 10.5703/128828431346510.5703/1288284313465 ↗
48. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81735110.1080/14680629.2013.817351 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.022 ↗
50. 10.1139/cjce-2013-025010.1139/cjce-2013-0250 ↗
51. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65707410.1080/14680629.2012.657074 ↗
52. 10.1080/14680629.2003.968994610.1080/14680629.2003.9689946 ↗
53. 10.1080/14680629.2001.968990610.1080/14680629.2001.9689906 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(76)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(76) ↗
55. 10.1016/S0040-6031(98)00539-510.1016/S0040-6031(98)00539-5 ↗
56. Planche, J. P., Martin, D., Lesueur, D. & King, G. N. (1996). Evaluation of elastomer modified bitumens using SHRP binder specifications (No. 4A, Part 7).
57. 10.3141/2444-0810.3141/2444-08 ↗
58. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138907210.1080/14680629.2017.1389072 ↗
59. 10.1617/s11527-015-0779-z10.1617/s11527-015-0779-z ↗
60. Sayegh G. · 1965
61. 10.1177/036119810619620010910.1177/0361198106196200109 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.10.00310.1016/j.trgeo.2016.10.003 ↗
63. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158955910.1080/14680629.2019.1589559 ↗
64. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126677410.1080/14680629.2016.1266774 ↗
65. 10.1080/14680629.2017.139300210.1080/14680629.2017.1393002 ↗
66. Yusoff N. I. M. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2011 · 4 · 324
67. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.038 ↗
68. 10.1080/14680629.2019.157423310.1080/14680629.2019.1574233 ↗
69. Zofka, A., Bernier, A., Mahoney, J. & Zinke, S. A. (2010). Laboratory evaluation of HMA containing RAP and PMB. Green Streets and Highways 2010: An Interactive Conference on the state of the Art and How to Achieve Sustainable Outcomes, ASCE, Reston, VA (pp. 378–389). https://doi.org/10.1061/41148(389)3110.1061/41148(389)31 ↗